Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

KrisHertfelder - prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Is this one any better?

    Click image for larger version  Name:	N708DN.jpg Views:	0 Size:	514.9 KB ID:	1088985


    It might be soft I am aware, but my primary concern is the whitebalance...

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by KrisHertfelder View Post
      Is this one any better?

      Click image for larger version Name:	N708DN.jpg Views:	0 Size:	514.9 KB ID:	1088985


      It might be soft I am aware, but my primary concern is the whitebalance...
      White balance looks fine.

      Comment


      • #18
        Again a prescreening request for these 3 pictures

        Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AINP.jpg
Views:	144
Size:	390.0 KB
ID:	1089078Click image for larger version

Name:	A7-AFH.jpg
Views:	142
Size:	380.9 KB
ID:	1089077Click image for larger version

Name:	9H-NEO.jpg
Views:	143
Size:	390.8 KB
ID:	1089079

        I guess the Qatari A330F is not worth trying, but I want your opinion on these..

        Thanks

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by KrisHertfelder View Post
          Again a prescreening request for these 3 pictures

          Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AINP.jpg
Views:	144
Size:	390.0 KB
ID:	1089078Click image for larger version

Name:	A7-AFH.jpg
Views:	142
Size:	380.9 KB
ID:	1089077Click image for larger version

Name:	9H-NEO.jpg
Views:	143
Size:	390.8 KB
ID:	1089079

          I guess the Qatari A330F is not worth trying, but I want your opinion on these..

          Thanks
          All images a bit soft, and second one dark/poor contrast.

          Comment


          • #20
            Hello,

            i got a identical picture to this rejected recently.
            I did some work on it. The previous image was Dark/Underexposed. Is this one any better?

            Click image for larger version

Name:	LX-N90451.jpg
Views:	161
Size:	451.5 KB
ID:	1104868

            Thank you in advance!

            Greetings

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by KrisHertfelder View Post
              Hello,

              i got a identical picture to this rejected recently.
              I did some work on it. The previous image was Dark/Underexposed. Is this one any better?

              Click image for larger version

Name:	LX-N90451.jpg
Views:	161
Size:	451.5 KB
ID:	1104868

              Thank you in advance!

              Greetings
              Exposure looks acceptable to me.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                Exposure looks acceptable to me.
                Are there any other problems with this picture? Or would this be worth a try?

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by KrisHertfelder View Post

                  Are there any other problems with this picture? Or would this be worth a try?
                  A bit low in the frame and somewhat soft.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Hello, I had these Images rejected mostly because of being "too soft". I did some work on them, are there any better now? Not only according to the "soft" problem, but are they acceptable in any way?


                    Click image for larger version

Name:	g-tuij rejected.jpg
Views:	130
Size:	760.2 KB
ID:	1110748Click image for larger version

Name:	d-aewg rejected.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	757.3 KB
ID:	1110749Click image for larger version

Name:	g-ymms rejected.jpg
Views:	123
Size:	683.4 KB
ID:	1110750Click image for larger version

Name:	d-gbvw rejected.jpg
Views:	119
Size:	789.1 KB
ID:	1110751Click image for larger version

Name:	g-zbkr rejected.jpg
Views:	124
Size:	621.8 KB
ID:	1110752

                    Best regards

                    Kris

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by KrisHertfelder View Post
                      Hello, I had these Images rejected mostly because of being "too soft". I did some work on them, are there any better now? Not only according to the "soft" problem, but are they acceptable in any way?


                      Click image for larger version

Name:	g-tuij rejected.jpg
Views:	130
Size:	760.2 KB
ID:	1110748Click image for larger version

Name:	d-aewg rejected.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	757.3 KB
ID:	1110749Click image for larger version

Name:	g-ymms rejected.jpg
Views:	123
Size:	683.4 KB
ID:	1110750Click image for larger version

Name:	d-gbvw rejected.jpg
Views:	119
Size:	789.1 KB
ID:	1110751Click image for larger version

Name:	g-zbkr rejected.jpg
Views:	124
Size:	621.8 KB
ID:	1110752

                      Best regards

                      Kris
                      Softness still likely to be a (small) issue for most or all of them; minor issues with contrast/processing as well.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Hello again,

                        need some advice on these pictures if they are acceptable like that. Thank you in advance!

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	85-0002.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	548.6 KB
ID:	1113906Click image for larger version

Name:	97-3093.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	655.0 KB
ID:	1113907

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by KrisHertfelder View Post
                          Hello again,

                          need some advice on these pictures if they are acceptable like that. Thank you in advance!

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	85-0002.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	548.6 KB
ID:	1113906Click image for larger version

Name:	97-3093.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	655.0 KB
ID:	1113907
                          Excuse me to ask again, but may I get a reply to my question?

                          Greetings

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by KrisHertfelder View Post

                            Excuse me to ask again, but may I get a reply to my question?

                            Greetings
                            There are issues with softness/heat haze and (weak) contrast for both of these images.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Good Morning and a happy new year to everyone!

                              I was out taking some pictures some time ago in some really weird lighting conditions an I was just wondering if these pictures below are acceptable or not.
                              Thank you very much in advance!
                              Greetings Krisztian

                              Click image for larger version  Name:	PH-EZC.jpg Views:	0 Size:	589.4 KB ID:	1177108Click image for larger version  Name:	D-AGWI2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	622.8 KB ID:	1177107 Click image for larger version

Name:	TS-INT.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	660.4 KB
ID:	1177121Click image for larger version

Name:	D-APRI-2.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	703.7 KB
ID:	1177120Click image for larger version  Name:	SP-LIQ.jpg Views:	3 Size:	673.7 KB ID:	1177106

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by KrisHertfelder View Post
                                Good Morning and a happy new year to everyone!

                                I was out taking some pictures some time ago in some really weird lighting conditions an I was just wondering if these pictures below are acceptable or not.
                                Thank you very much in advance!
                                All soft to varying degrees, and slightly noisy.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X