Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Qixuan Zhang View Post

    How does the photo look now?(Last try, thank you.)

    Click image for larger version  Name:	B-6126-10-pre(亮度-3)+2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	681.1 KB ID:	1091925Click image for larger version  Name:	ZJSY-pre(对比度-50亮度+3).jpg Views:	0 Size:	814.5 KB ID:	1091926
    1. color (blue tint), contrast, noisy
    2. borderline contrast. not going to comment on this any more.

    Comment


    • #47
      Hello screener, I want to know what you think of these two photos.

      First, there is a "Spotting Location" I took in the database. I want to know whether the following two photos cause "similar".

      Secondly, there seems to be some dust in the second photo. Are they obvious enough to be rejected? And are there any other problems with these two photos that will lead to rejection?

      Finally, there is a brief introduction about these two Spotting Locations:

      1. This is one of the most famous spotting location of Beijing Capital International Airport, located on the south side of the runway 36R. Here you can not only take pictures of the plane landing, but also take pictures of the plane taxiing and taking off. In addition to aviation enthusiasts, it is also frequented by nearby residents. Coordinates on Google Earth: 4002′55.48″ 11635′56.38″.

      2. This is a park called "West Lake Park", where you can take a picture of the plane landing on runway 36R in the morning. Coordinates on Google Earth: 4002′49.54″ 11635′20.58″.

      Thanks in advance.

      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9299-10-pre.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	723.2 KB
ID:	1092040Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1631-10-pre.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	725.3 KB
ID:	1092039

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Qixuan Zhang View Post
        Hello screener, I want to know what you think of these two photos.

        First, there is a "Spotting Location" I took in the database. I want to know whether the following two photos cause "similar".

        Secondly, there seems to be some dust in the second photo. Are they obvious enough to be rejected? And are there any other problems with these two photos that will lead to rejection?

        Finally, there is a brief introduction about these two Spotting Locations:

        1. This is one of the most famous spotting location of Beijing Capital International Airport, located on the south side of the runway 36R. Here you can not only take pictures of the plane landing, but also take pictures of the plane taxiing and taking off. In addition to aviation enthusiasts, it is also frequented by nearby residents. Coordinates on Google Earth: 4002′55.48″ 11635′56.38″.

        2. This is a park called "West Lake Park", where you can take a picture of the plane landing on runway 36R in the morning. Coordinates on Google Earth: 4002′49.54″ 11635′20.58″.

        Thanks in advance.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9299-10-pre.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	723.2 KB
ID:	1092040Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1631-10-pre.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	725.3 KB
ID:	1092039
        Couldn't tell you if either of them are similar without seeing the already accepted image..

        First likely a motive rejection, as the people take up most of the frame, and they are poorly composed. Second doesn't really show any part of the airport, does it?

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

          Couldn't tell you if either of them are similar without seeing the already accepted image..

          First likely a motive rejection, as the people take up most of the frame, and they are poorly composed. Second doesn't really show any part of the airport, does it?
          Sorry forgot to attach the link, here is my previous photo: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9742658

          I chose the photo a few seconds before that. Does it avoid the problem that people just stand there watching and occupy a lot of screens? I think it still occupies a lot?

          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9297.jpg
Views:	60
Size:	812.4 KB
ID:	1092069

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Qixuan Zhang View Post

            Sorry forgot to attach the link, here is my previous photo: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9742658

            I chose the photo a few seconds before that. Does it avoid the problem that people just stand there watching and occupy a lot of screens? I think it still occupies a lot?

            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9297.jpg
Views:	60
Size:	812.4 KB
ID:	1092069
            This one should be ok for motive. Assuming it's a completely different location, and not just a few meters away, it should not be considered similar.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

              This one should be ok for motive. Assuming it's a completely different location, and not just a few meters away, it should not be considered similar.
              Thanks, are there any other issues in this photo that will lead to rejection?

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Qixuan Zhang View Post

                Thanks, are there any other issues in this photo that will lead to rejection?
                Softness.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                  Softness.
                  I have increased some sharpness, is it up to standard now? But I am a little worried about the distortion of the words on the plane. What is the reason? Can I fix it?

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-10.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	829.4 KB
ID:	1092140

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Qixuan Zhang View Post

                    I have increased some sharpness, is it up to standard now? But I am a little worried about the distortion of the words on the plane. What is the reason? Can I fix it?

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-10.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	829.4 KB
ID:	1092140
                    Would be ok for me.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Hello screener, I want to know the problems with the following five photos, thank you.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-B-300P-10.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	741.1 KB
ID:	1092246Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-B-6599-20.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	699.2 KB
ID:	1092245Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-IMG_1151-10.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	677.8 KB
ID:	1092247Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-IMG_9122-10.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	755.5 KB
ID:	1092248Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-IMG_9303-10.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	824.1 KB
ID:	1092249

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Qixuan Zhang View Post
                        Hello screener, I want to know the problems with the following five photos, thank you.
                        #1 is a tad dark but looks acceptable
                        #2 looks a tad too dark
                        #3 is soft
                        #4 borderline contrast, might have a chance
                        #5 look unleveled to me

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by pdeboer View Post

                          #1 is a tad dark but looks acceptable
                          #2 looks a tad too dark
                          #3 is soft
                          #4 borderline contrast, might have a chance
                          #5 look unleveled to me
                          Thank you for your reply. I re-edited these pictures, do they now meet the accepted standards? Still need further modification?

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-B-300P-10(亮度+5).jpg
Views:	27
Size:	757.6 KB
ID:	1092316Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-B-6599-20(亮度+8).jpg
Views:	33
Size:	716.1 KB
ID:	1092313Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-IMG_1151-10(锐化+10).jpg
Views:	25
Size:	694.4 KB
ID:	1092315Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-IMG_9122-10(对比度+15 亮度-2).jpg
Views:	25
Size:	764.7 KB
ID:	1092317Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9303-10.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	830.6 KB
ID:	1092314

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Qixuan Zhang View Post

                            Thank you for your reply. I re-edited these pictures, do they now meet the accepted standards? Still need further modification?

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-B-300P-10(亮度+5).jpg
Views:	27
Size:	757.6 KB
ID:	1092316Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-B-6599-20(亮度+8).jpg
Views:	33
Size:	716.1 KB
ID:	1092313Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-IMG_1151-10(锐化+10).jpg
Views:	25
Size:	694.4 KB
ID:	1092315Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-IMG_9122-10(对比度+15 亮度-2).jpg
Views:	25
Size:	764.7 KB
ID:	1092317Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9303-10.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	830.6 KB
ID:	1092314
                            3. borderline noisy sky
                            4. borderline overexposed

                            Rest would be ok for me.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                              3. borderline noisy sky
                              4. borderline overexposed

                              Rest would be ok for me.
                              Thank you.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Hello screener, I want to know the problems with the following five photos. One of the things that worries me the most is the issue of dust. I am not sure if I have removed all the dust that will lead to rejection. Thanks in advance!

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-P1-20.jpg
Views:	88
Size:	599.7 KB
ID:	1092499Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-P2-20.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	578.1 KB
ID:	1092498Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-P3-20.jpg
Views:	101
Size:	560.9 KB
ID:	1092497Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-P4-20.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	594.4 KB
ID:	1092501Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-P5-20.jpg
Views:	90
Size:	613.8 KB
ID:	1092500

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X