prescreening request / editing advice

[dlowwa]

How does the photo look now?（Last try, thank you.）

1. color (blue tint), contrast, noisy
2. borderline contrast. not going to comment on this any more.

[Qixuan Zhang]

Hello screener, I want to know what you think of these two photos.

First, there is a "Spotting Location" I took in the database. I want to know whether the following two photos cause "similar".

Secondly, there seems to be some dust in the second photo. Are they obvious enough to be rejected? And are there any other problems with these two photos that will lead to rejection?

Finally, there is a brief introduction about these two Spotting Locations:

1. This is one of the most famous spotting location of Beijing Capital International Airport, located on the south side of the runway 36R. Here you can not only take pictures of the plane landing, but also take pictures of the plane taxiing and taking off. In addition to aviation enthusiasts, it is also frequented by nearby residents. Coordinates on Google Earth: 40°02′55.48″ 116°35′56.38″.

2. This is a park called "West Lake Park", where you can take a picture of the plane landing on runway 36R in the morning. Coordinates on Google Earth: 40°02′49.54″ 116°35′20.58″.

Thanks in advance.

[dlowwa]

Hello screener, I want to know what you think of these two photos.

First, there is a "Spotting Location" I took in the database. I want to know whether the following two photos cause "similar".

Secondly, there seems to be some dust in the second photo. Are they obvious enough to be rejected? And are there any other problems with these two photos that will lead to rejection?

Finally, there is a brief introduction about these two Spotting Locations:

1. This is one of the most famous spotting location of Beijing Capital International Airport, located on the south side of the runway 36R. Here you can not only take pictures of the plane landing, but also take pictures of the plane taxiing and taking off. In addition to aviation enthusiasts, it is also frequented by nearby residents. Coordinates on Google Earth: 40°02′55.48″ 116°35′56.38″.

2. This is a park called "West Lake Park", where you can take a picture of the plane landing on runway 36R in the morning. Coordinates on Google Earth: 40°02′49.54″ 116°35′20.58″.

Thanks in advance.

Couldn't tell you if either of them are similar without seeing the already accepted image..

First likely a motive rejection, as the people take up most of the frame, and they are poorly composed. Second doesn't really show any part of the airport, does it?

[Qixuan Zhang]

Couldn't tell you if either of them are similar without seeing the already accepted image..

First likely a motive rejection, as the people take up most of the frame, and they are poorly composed. Second doesn't really show any part of the airport, does it?

Sorry forgot to attach the link, here is my previous photo: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9742658

I chose the photo a few seconds before that. Does it avoid the problem that people just stand there watching and occupy a lot of screens? I think it still occupies a lot?

[dlowwa]

Sorry forgot to attach the link, here is my previous photo: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9742658

I chose the photo a few seconds before that. Does it avoid the problem that people just stand there watching and occupy a lot of screens? I think it still occupies a lot?

This one should be ok for motive. Assuming it's a completely different location, and not just a few meters away, it should not be considered similar.

[Qixuan Zhang]

This one should be ok for motive. Assuming it's a completely different location, and not just a few meters away, it should not be considered similar.

Thanks, are there any other issues in this photo that will lead to rejection?

[dlowwa]

Thanks, are there any other issues in this photo that will lead to rejection?

Softness.

[Qixuan Zhang]

Softness.

I have increased some sharpness, is it up to standard now? But I am a little worried about the distortion of the words on the plane. What is the reason? Can I fix it?

[dlowwa]

I have increased some sharpness, is it up to standard now? But I am a little worried about the distortion of the words on the plane. What is the reason? Can I fix it?

Would be ok for me.

[Qixuan Zhang]

Hello screener, I want to know the problems with the following five photos, thank you.

[pdeboer]

Hello screener, I want to know the problems with the following five photos, thank you.

#1 is a tad dark but looks acceptable
#2 looks a tad too dark
#3 is soft
#4 borderline contrast, might have a chance
#5 look unleveled to me

[Qixuan Zhang]

#1 is a tad dark but looks acceptable
#2 looks a tad too dark
#3 is soft
#4 borderline contrast, might have a chance
#5 look unleveled to me

Thank you for your reply. I re-edited these pictures, do they now meet the accepted standards? Still need further modification?

[dlowwa]

Thank you for your reply. I re-edited these pictures, do they now meet the accepted standards? Still need further modification?

3. borderline noisy sky
4. borderline overexposed

Rest would be ok for me.

[Qixuan Zhang]

3. borderline noisy sky
4. borderline overexposed

Rest would be ok for me.

Thank you.

[Qixuan Zhang]

Hello screener, I want to know the problems with the following five photos. One of the things that worries me the most is the issue of dust. I am not sure if I have removed all the dust that will lead to rejection. Thanks in advance!