Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Hi everyone, I just had a photo rejected because of Horizon unlevel, here is the link: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8221253.

    In this picture, I adjusted the horizon according to the roofs of blue and yellow buildings, and I kept them level. But doing so makes vertical things look slanted. I had some accepted photos that were taken at the same location and used the same adjustment method. I found that the common thing is that the yellow building is rarely included in the photo. Does this mean that the yellow building will bring some illusions? And, when encountering similar situations in the future, should I give priority to keeping vertical things vertical rather than horizontal things?

    There may be some grammatical and vocabulary errors in this passage, please forgive me.

    Thanks in advance!

    Comment


    • #77
      因为视角的原因,以水平线为准,并不总是可靠的,所以一些技术文章中建议,以垂直线为基准调地平,比较可靠。仅代表个人建议,祝好运。

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by MaoTing View Post
        因为视角的原因,以水平线为准,并不总是可靠的,所以一些技术文章中建议,以垂直线为基准调地平,比较可靠。仅代表个人建议,祝好运。
        好的谢谢大佬!第一次在这里看到中文哈哈哈我之前感觉如果以垂直线对地平的话房顶歪的特别扭,但是看来还是得用垂直的对~

        Comment


        • #79
          我看你写的location 是北京,同为北京飞友就直接写中文了,反正英文我也整不明白,哈哈哈

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by MaoTing View Post
            我看你写的location 是北京,同为北京飞友就直接写中文了,反正英文我也整不明白,哈哈哈
            期待以后在机场见到您~

            Comment


            • #81
              Hello screener, I want to know if the following four photos have dirty, backlit, cut-off and other problems that I have not yet discovered? Thank you.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0624-P1-20(B-5901).jpg
Views:	49
Size:	600.2 KB
ID:	1093079Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0624-P2-30.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	580.4 KB
ID:	1093080Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0624-P3-10.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	699.6 KB
ID:	1093082Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0624-P4-10.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	597.2 KB
ID:	1093081

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by Qixuan Zhang View Post
                Hello screener, I want to know if the following four photos have dirty, backlit, cut-off and other problems that I have not yet discovered? Thank you.
                1. soft towards left side
                2. soft, debris in air (tree pollen?) might be considered dust
                3. ok for me
                4. dirty

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                  1. soft towards left side
                  2. soft, debris in air (tree pollen?) might be considered dust
                  3. ok for me
                  4. dirty
                  That's catkins. I don't know if catkin is tree pollen. Because the photo was taken in spring with catkins flying. I added some sharpening to #1 and #2, and eliminated most of the debris in the sky (fuselage no). Do they now meet the standards? My handling of #2 should not judge me as Digital manipulation?

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	pre-B-5901-20.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	652.5 KB
ID:	1093114Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0624-P2-30-20.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	618.1 KB
ID:	1093113

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by Qixuan Zhang View Post

                    That's catkins. I don't know if catkin is tree pollen. Because the photo was taken in spring with catkins flying. I added some sharpening to #1 and #2, and eliminated most of the debris in the sky (fuselage no). Do they now meet the standards? My handling of #2 should not judge me as Digital manipulation?

                    Click image for larger version  Name:	pre-B-5901-20.jpg Views:	0 Size:	652.5 KB ID:	1093114Click image for larger version  Name:	pre0624-P2-30-20.jpg Views:	0 Size:	618.1 KB ID:	1093113
                    #2 a bit soft towards the tail, but otherwise they might be acceptable as they are.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Hello screener, I want to know if the following 5 photos have dirty, cut-off, contrast, color, similar(https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9752292) and other problems that I have not yet discovered? Thanks in advance.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0626-P1-20.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	613.7 KB
ID:	1093172Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0626-P2-20.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	622.4 KB
ID:	1093174Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0626-P3-20.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	619.0 KB
ID:	1093173Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0626-P4-20.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	574.4 KB
ID:	1093171Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0626-P5-20.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	701.0 KB
ID:	1093175

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by Qixuan Zhang View Post
                        Hello screener, I want to know if the following 5 photos have dirty, cut-off, contrast, color, similar(https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9752292) and other problems that I have not yet discovered? Thanks in advance.
                        2 yes similar if same day
                        1-3 ok
                        4 borderline contrast/vignetting
                        5. borderline noise/color (cyan cast)

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Hello screener, I want to know the problems with the following five photos, thank you.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0629-1-20.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	953.7 KB
ID:	1093328Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0629-2-20.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	628.1 KB
ID:	1093327Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0629-3-20.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	590.1 KB
ID:	1093325Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0629-4-0.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	860.8 KB
ID:	1093329Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0629-5-10.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	580.4 KB
ID:	1093326

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by Qixuan Zhang View Post
                            Hello screener, I want to know the problems with the following five photos, thank you.

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0629-1-20.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	953.7 KB
ID:	1093328Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0629-2-20.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	628.1 KB
ID:	1093327Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0629-3-20.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	590.1 KB
ID:	1093325Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0629-4-0.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	860.8 KB
ID:	1093329Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0629-5-10.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	580.4 KB
ID:	1093326
                            3/5. borderline color (cyan/green tint)
                            4. borderline contrast

                            Otherwise would be ok for me.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                              3/5. borderline color (cyan/green tint)
                              4. borderline contrast

                              Otherwise would be ok for me.
                              Thank you for your reply. Is my adjustment appropriate?

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0629-3-20(蓝-5绿-5).jpg
Views:	19
Size:	594.6 KB
ID:	1093356Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0629-4-0(对比度+10).jpg
Views:	19
Size:	870.5 KB
ID:	1093358Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0629-5-10(蓝-5绿-5).jpg
Views:	18
Size:	583.2 KB
ID:	1093357

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by Qixuan Zhang View Post

                                Thank you for your reply. Is my adjustment appropriate?

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0629-3-20(蓝-5绿-5).jpg
Views:	19
Size:	594.6 KB
ID:	1093356Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0629-4-0(对比度+10).jpg
Views:	19
Size:	870.5 KB
ID:	1093358Click image for larger version

Name:	pre0629-5-10(蓝-5绿-5).jpg
Views:	18
Size:	583.2 KB
ID:	1093357
                                I see very little difference between these and the previous versions.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X