lbastardo // Pre-screening advice

[thebigdog360]

Not a screener, but if the building was near to you, then surely the shadow would be crisper like the shadows under the airplane? Rather than very soft and not that dark.

[LBASTARDO]

Hi -- hope all is well.

Got this rejection recently for "vignetting" but I don't really see it. Only corner I see is bottom right, but that appears to be the shadow of a building I had on my right rather than vignetting. Any chance I can appeal?

Thanks.

[dlowwa]

Hi -- couple questions about these rejections:

1 & 2 were rejected due to heat distortion; however, I don't really see the distortion - can you tell me where the distortion can be found? Just want to know what to look for in the future.
3 - some dust sensor rejection; but that small black dot is very small; could even be a bird, for what is worth. Any chance I can appeal it?

Thanks.

1-2 heat haze is noticeable, but might be acceptable at lower resolution
3 I agree probably not dust, but there is something and we allow you to remove indistinguishable spots, so best to resubmit with it removed

[nsxr_]

Hi -- couple questions about these rejections:

1 & 2 were rejected due to heat distortion; however, I don't really see the distortion - can you tell me where the distortion can be found? Just want to know what to look for in the future.
3 - some dust sensor rejection; but that small black dot is very small; could even be a bird, for what is worth. Any chance I can appeal it?

Thanks.

Hello, I'm not a screener but:

1 - Heat distortion visible on the wing and elevator.
2 - Heat distortion on nose gear area and engine cowling.
3 - You could try appealing but personally I'd remove the spot and re-upload.

[LBASTARDO]

Hi -- couple questions about these rejections:

1 & 2 were rejected due to heat distortion; however, I don't really see the distortion - can you tell me where the distortion can be found? Just want to know what to look for in the future.
3 - some dust sensor rejection; but that small black dot is very small; could even be a bird, for what is worth. Any chance I can appeal it?

Thanks.

[dlowwa]

hi dlowwa -- just got a question about this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10160236

It was rejected due to being underexposed, which it is fairly understandable. However, if I add just a little more exposure to the photo, the nose of the plane will be overblown. I've gotten a couple rejections recently due to this same issue: Whole plane exposed correctly, but then the nose overexposed, hence rejected.


I feel like for this rejection the exposure is fine due to:
1. More exposure will make the nose overexposed.
2. This was shot at the end of the day, barely any light left, it could even be considered a night shot. And there are definitely way darker photos in the database.

I don't think adding exposure will create too many issues if done carefully.

[LBASTARDO]

hi dlowwa -- just got a question about this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10160236

It was rejected due to being underexposed, which it is fairly understandable. However, if I add just a little more exposure to the photo, the nose of the plane will be overblown. I've gotten a couple rejections recently due to this same issue: Whole plane exposed correctly, but then the nose overexposed, hence rejected.


I feel like for this rejection the exposure is fine due to:
1. More exposure will make the nose overexposed.
2. This was shot at the end of the day, barely any light left, it could even be considered a night shot. And there are definitely way darker photos in the database.

Please let me know what you think.

Thanks,
Luis.

[dlowwa]

Hi all --
Question about this recent rejection I just got. Please see horizon guides I used below, let me know what I could've done differently to avoid this rejection or if it was wrongfully rejected. Thanks.

Looks like it needs a little CCW rotation.

[LBASTARDO]

Hi all --
Question about this recent rejection I just got. Please see horizon guides I used below, let me know what I could've done differently to avoid this rejection or if it was wrongfully rejected. Thanks.

[dlowwa]

hi, long time! question about the below: would it be accepted as "artistic" or is the plane too small on the frame? Thanks!

Definitely too far.

[LBASTARDO]

hi, long time! question about the below: would it be accepted as "artistic" or is the plane too small on the frame? Thanks!

[dlowwa]

gotcha, the crop is very subjective but i agree on the business jet category - all good, thanks!

Also, for this other rejection, it is literally the same framing, angle, and type of aircraft as this one that was accepted - any reason why one was accepted and one was rejected?

Thanks!

Not much difference I agree, so it comes down to personal taste I suppose, though the crop on the rejected one is much closer to the tip of the stabilizer, which is generally a no-no. Both would have been ok for me.

[LBASTARDO]

Awkward crop on the left side. This is obviously not a business jet.

gotcha, the crop is very subjective but i agree on the business jet category - all good, thanks!

Also, for this other rejection, it is literally the same framing, angle, and type of aircraft as this one that was accepted - any reason why one was accepted and one was rejected?

Thanks!

[dlowwa]

thanks!

quick question about this rejection.

it was rejected due to wrong categories and parts cropped.

i've uploaded close-ups before and it hasn't been rejected, which parts were cropped here? and secondly, which categories are/were missing/wrong?

thanks in advance.

Awkward crop on the left side. This is obviously not a business jet.

[LBASTARDO]

thanks!

quick question about this rejection.

it was rejected due to wrong categories and parts cropped.

i've uploaded close-ups before and it hasn't been rejected, which parts were cropped here? and secondly, which categories are/were missing/wrong?

thanks in advance.