Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

lbastardo // Pre-screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • thebigdog360
    replied
    Not a screener, but if the building was near to you, then surely the shadow would be crisper like the shadows under the airplane? Rather than very soft and not that dark.

    Leave a comment:


  • LBASTARDO
    replied
    Hi -- hope all is well.

    Got this rejection recently for "vignetting" but I don't really see it. Only corner I see is bottom right, but that appears to be the shadow of a building I had on my right rather than vignetting. Any chance I can appeal?

    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LBASTARDO View Post
    Hi -- couple questions about these rejections:

    1 & 2 were rejected due to heat distortion; however, I don't really see the distortion - can you tell me where the distortion can be found? Just want to know what to look for in the future.
    3 - some dust sensor rejection; but that small black dot is very small; could even be a bird, for what is worth. Any chance I can appeal it?

    Thanks.
    1-2 heat haze is noticeable, but might be acceptable at lower resolution
    3 I agree probably not dust, but there is something and we allow you to remove indistinguishable spots, so best to resubmit with it removed

    Leave a comment:


  • nsxr_
    replied
    Originally posted by LBASTARDO View Post
    Hi -- couple questions about these rejections:

    1 & 2 were rejected due to heat distortion; however, I don't really see the distortion - can you tell me where the distortion can be found? Just want to know what to look for in the future.
    3 - some dust sensor rejection; but that small black dot is very small; could even be a bird, for what is worth. Any chance I can appeal it?

    Thanks.
    Hello, I'm not a screener but:

    1 - Heat distortion visible on the wing and elevator.
    2 - Heat distortion on nose gear area and engine cowling.
    3 - You could try appealing but personally I'd remove the spot and re-upload.

    Leave a comment:


  • LBASTARDO
    replied
    Hi -- couple questions about these rejections:

    1 & 2 were rejected due to heat distortion; however, I don't really see the distortion - can you tell me where the distortion can be found? Just want to know what to look for in the future.
    3 - some dust sensor rejection; but that small black dot is very small; could even be a bird, for what is worth. Any chance I can appeal it?

    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LBASTARDO View Post
    hi dlowwa -- just got a question about this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10160236

    It was rejected due to being underexposed, which it is fairly understandable. However, if I add just a little more exposure to the photo, the nose of the plane will be overblown. I've gotten a couple rejections recently due to this same issue: Whole plane exposed correctly, but then the nose overexposed, hence rejected.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen Shot 2022-06-03 at 1.29.46 PM.png
Views:	96
Size:	119.6 KB
ID:	1138116

    I feel like for this rejection the exposure is fine due to:
    1. More exposure will make the nose overexposed.
    2. This was shot at the end of the day, barely any light left, it could even be considered a night shot. And there are definitely way darker photos in the database.
    I don't think adding exposure will create too many issues if done carefully.

    Leave a comment:


  • LBASTARDO
    replied
    hi dlowwa -- just got a question about this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10160236

    It was rejected due to being underexposed, which it is fairly understandable. However, if I add just a little more exposure to the photo, the nose of the plane will be overblown. I've gotten a couple rejections recently due to this same issue: Whole plane exposed correctly, but then the nose overexposed, hence rejected.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen Shot 2022-06-03 at 1.29.46 PM.png
Views:	96
Size:	119.6 KB
ID:	1138116

    I feel like for this rejection the exposure is fine due to:
    1. More exposure will make the nose overexposed.
    2. This was shot at the end of the day, barely any light left, it could even be considered a night shot. And there are definitely way darker photos in the database.

    Please let me know what you think.

    Thanks,
    Luis.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LBASTARDO View Post
    Hi all --
    Question about this recent rejection I just got. Please see horizon guides I used below, let me know what I could've done differently to avoid this rejection or if it was wrongfully rejected. Thanks.
    Looks like it needs a little CCW rotation.

    Leave a comment:


  • LBASTARDO
    replied
    Hi all --
    Question about this recent rejection I just got. Please see horizon guides I used below, let me know what I could've done differently to avoid this rejection or if it was wrongfully rejected. Thanks.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by LBASTARDO; 2022-04-24, 23:39. Reason: larger screenshot

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LBASTARDO View Post
    hi, long time! question about the below: would it be accepted as "artistic" or is the plane too small on the frame? Thanks!
    Definitely too far.

    Leave a comment:


  • LBASTARDO
    replied
    hi, long time! question about the below: would it be accepted as "artistic" or is the plane too small on the frame? Thanks!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-VIIA---British-Airways---Boeing-777-236(ER).jpg
Views:	93
Size:	616.6 KB
ID:	1133229

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LBASTARDO View Post

    gotcha, the crop is very subjective but i agree on the business jet category - all good, thanks!

    Also, for this other rejection, it is literally the same framing, angle, and type of aircraft as this one that was accepted - any reason why one was accepted and one was rejected?

    Thanks!
    Not much difference I agree, so it comes down to personal taste I suppose, though the crop on the rejected one is much closer to the tip of the stabilizer, which is generally a no-no. Both would have been ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • LBASTARDO
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Awkward crop on the left side. This is obviously not a business jet.
    gotcha, the crop is very subjective but i agree on the business jet category - all good, thanks!

    Also, for this other rejection, it is literally the same framing, angle, and type of aircraft as this one that was accepted - any reason why one was accepted and one was rejected?

    Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LBASTARDO View Post
    thanks!

    quick question about this rejection.

    it was rejected due to wrong categories and parts cropped.

    i've uploaded close-ups before and it hasn't been rejected, which parts were cropped here? and secondly, which categories are/were missing/wrong?

    thanks in advance.
    Awkward crop on the left side. This is obviously not a business jet.

    Leave a comment:


  • LBASTARDO
    replied
    thanks!

    quick question about this rejection.

    it was rejected due to wrong categories and parts cropped.

    i've uploaded close-ups before and it hasn't been rejected, which parts were cropped here? and secondly, which categories are/were missing/wrong?

    thanks in advance.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X