lbastardo // Pre-screening advice

[LBASTARDO]

hey guys!
have a question about this photo:

I don't know if it's going to be rejected due to "vignetting" as there were some clouds at the bottom of the frame but none at the top creating two different tones in the sky that might be classified as vignetting.

Please let me know.

Thanks,
Luis.

[dlowwa]

hey guys!
have a question about this photo:

I don't know if it's going to be rejected due to "vignetting" as there were some clouds at the bottom of the frame but none at the top creating two different tones in the sky that might be classified as vignetting.

Please let me know.

Thanks,
Luis.

Vignetting should not be an issue with this image.

[LBASTARDO]

Vignetting should not be an issue with this image.

that's great!
Is there any issue with it though? I think it's fine but you never know.

[dlowwa]

that's great!
Is there any issue with it though? I think it's fine but you never know.

I find the tree branches on the right side distracting, but not strictly a reason for rejection.

[LBASTARDO]

Hi Dana!
Happy holidays!

I would like to know if this photo is acceptable for JP, thanks!

[dlowwa]

Hi Dana!
Happy holidays!

I would like to know if this photo is acceptable for JP, thanks!

Nearly backlit, so likely contrast or backlit rejection.

[LBASTARDO]

hi guys! question:
just found this photo on my archives and was wondering if it was acceptable for JP - I know we can't blur faces but I don't know if the pilot's face is too recognizable. Thanks in advance!

[dlowwa]

hi guys! question:
just found this photo on my archives and was wondering if it was acceptable for JP - I know we can't blur faces but I don't know if the pilot's face is too recognizable. Thanks in advance!

Faces are fine, but would be borderline for contrast.

[LBASTARDO]

Hi!

Hope you're well.
Was wondering if this photo is acceptable - it got cloudy at the wrong time and it might have messed up the contrast.

Thanks,
Luis.

[dlowwa]

Hi!

Hope you're well.
Was wondering if this photo is acceptable - it got cloudy at the wrong time and it might have messed up the contrast.

Thanks,
Luis.

Relatively good chance this would indeed be rejected for contrast.

[LBASTARDO]

Heyo!

Quick question - would the truck right in front of the front wheel be enough for a rejection? And, if not, would the photo be acceptable? I've seen way too many different types of edit for night photos that I'm not sure, yet. Seems to be screeners are a bit more lenient when it comes to night photos, but I might be mistaken.

Thanks,
Luis.

[PabloGlez]

Heyo!

Quick question - would the truck right in front of the front wheel be enough for a rejection? And, if not, would the photo be acceptable? I've seen way too many different types of edit for night photos that I'm not sure, yet. Seems to be screeners are a bit more lenient when it comes to night photos, but I might be mistaken.

Thanks,
Luis.

I´m not screener but in my opinion the truck is so obstructive, and about the edition, it doesn't looks too bad for me, acceptable, but I would add a bit of exposure (without over expossed it) because some areas have more shadows.

Regards.
Pablo Gonzalez de Leon

[dlowwa]

Heyo!

Quick question - would the truck right in front of the front wheel be enough for a rejection?

This would be rejected for obstruction.

[LBASTARDO]

Hi!

Question - I'm trying to frame this aircraft properly. When I center the fuselage, as I usually do, it's just too off and it just doesn't look good. So then I tried centering the aircraft as a whole, would this be rejected as the fuselage is not centered?

Thanks,
Luis.

[dlowwa]

Hi!

Question - I'm trying to frame this aircraft properly. When I center the fuselage, as I usually do, it's just too off and it just doesn't look good. So then I tried centering the aircraft as a whole, would this be rejected as the fuselage is not centered?

Centering looks fine.