Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

lbastardo // Pre-screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LBASTARDO
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Soft and borderline contrast. Small Prop and Vintage apply.
    got it, thank you so much!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LBASTARDO View Post
    hey, dlowwa ! had a question about this photo. first, i'd like to know if it's acceptable. and second, if it is, do i have to check "Small Prop" AND "Warbird/Vintage" or just small prop? Thanks!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N65370---Geico-Skytypers---North-American-SNJ-2-Texan.jpg
Views:	117
Size:	1.71 MB
ID:	1116956
    Soft and borderline contrast. Small Prop and Vintage apply.

    Leave a comment:


  • LBASTARDO
    replied
    hey, dlowwa ! had a question about this photo. first, i'd like to know if it's acceptable. and second, if it is, do i have to check "Small Prop" AND "Warbird/Vintage" or just small prop? Thanks!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N65370---Geico-Skytypers---North-American-SNJ-2-Texan.jpg
Views:	117
Size:	1.71 MB
ID:	1116956

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LBASTARDO View Post
    hey all!

    have a question about a recent rejection - it says "Bad Info: Airline" but usually for aircrafts like this Private works, I don't know what would be in this case. On the FAA website it says the owner is "HERITAGE ASSET LEASING LLC", should the airline be that? Even FR24 says the owner is "Private".

    Thanks!
    Operator is easily visible on the aircraft. Please use that.

    Leave a comment:


  • LBASTARDO
    replied
    hey all!

    have a question about a recent rejection - it says "Bad Info: Airline" but usually for aircrafts like this Private works, I don't know what would be in this case. On the FAA website it says the owner is "HERITAGE ASSET LEASING LLC", should the airline be that? Even FR24 says the owner is "Private".

    Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LBASTARDO View Post

    how about now?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	VQ-BQC---Aeroflot---Boeing-777-3M0ER-v3.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	935.9 KB
ID:	1116465
    Centering ok, but not the best crop on the right.

    Leave a comment:


  • LBASTARDO
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Too low in the frame, and borderline crop on the right.
    how about now?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	VQ-BQC---Aeroflot---Boeing-777-3M0ER-v3.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	935.9 KB
ID:	1116465

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LBASTARDO View Post
    hey its me again - i was wondering if i could get some advice on this photo please? i'm not 100% sold on the crop. Thanks!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	VQ-BQC---Aeroflot---Boeing-777-3M0ER-v2.jpg
Views:	124
Size:	725.9 KB
ID:	1116454
    Too low in the frame, and borderline crop on the right.

    Leave a comment:


  • LBASTARDO
    replied
    hey its me again - i was wondering if i could get some advice on this photo please? i'm not 100% sold on the crop. Thanks!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	VQ-BQC---Aeroflot---Boeing-777-3M0ER-v2.jpg
Views:	124
Size:	725.9 KB
ID:	1116454

    Leave a comment:


  • LBASTARDO
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Quality is acceptable for me. Yes Night Shot.
    thank you so much for all your help!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LBASTARDO View Post

    Ok, last try - cropped a bit more similar to v1 and exported at 1600px. Also, if/when I upload, this would be a night shot because it was during the sunset, right?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	9V-SGC---Singapore-Airlines---Airbus-A350-941-v5.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	1.25 MB
ID:	1116393
    Quality is acceptable for me. Yes Night Shot.

    Leave a comment:


  • LBASTARDO
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Previous crop was better. Somewhat soft towards the nose, but as always such (minor) flaws are much more visible at 1920pix.
    Ok, last try - cropped a bit more similar to v1 and exported at 1600px. Also, if/when I upload, this would be a night shot because it was during the sunset, right?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	9V-SGC---Singapore-Airlines---Airbus-A350-941-v5.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	1.25 MB
ID:	1116393

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LBASTARDO View Post

    Would this crop be okay? Also, where is it soft? Honest question, looking at the full quality file it seems to be all in focus. Thanks!
    Previous crop was better. Somewhat soft towards the nose, but as always such (minor) flaws are much more visible at 1920pix.

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Originally posted by LBASTARDO View Post

    Would this crop be okay? Also, where is it soft? Honest question, looking at the full quality file it seems to be all in focus. Thanks!

    Im not screener but the crop would be ok for me now. And it is a bit soft mainly in the nose/cabin and in the top of the fuselage. Not a big deal for me at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • LBASTARDO
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. obstruction, horizon
    2. borderline cut off/soft
    Would this crop be okay? Also, where is it soft? Honest question, looking at the full quality file it seems to be all in focus. Thanks!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	9V-SGC---Singapore-Airlines---Airbus-A350-941-v3.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	1.72 MB
ID:	1116325

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X