Originally posted by LBASTARDO
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
lbastardo // Pre-screening advice
Collapse
X
-
Hi,
I have a question.
I got this photo rejection due to "Bad info: Date". However, it was taken on June 14, 2020, at JFK as stated when I uploaded the photo. I appealed the rejection with this screenshot showing that it was taken that day:
Yet the screener denied the appeal saying: " It was not at JFK 14-6-2020. We take date cheating quite serious " - it was literally taken that day, there is nothing for me to gain from changing the date. How can I actually prove that it was taken that day?
Thanks,
Luis.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LBASTARDO View PostHi,
I have a question.
I got this photo rejection due to "Bad info: Date". However, it was taken on June 14, 2020, at JFK as stated when I uploaded the photo. I appealed the rejection with this screenshot showing that it was taken that day:
Yet the screener denied the appeal saying: " It was not at JFK 14-6-2020. We take date cheating quite serious " - it was literally taken that day, there is nothing for me to gain from changing the date. How can I actually prove that it was taken that day?
Thanks,
Luis.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Hi dlowwa,
I have a question about a recent rejection ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8326977 )
The motive was about vignetting and I clearly understand why they would think I added some vignetting to the photo but I didn't. Here is the original, and you can clearly see that that's how it came out straight from the camera:
Is there anything I can do about it?
Thanks!
Comment
-
Originally posted by LBASTARDO View PostHi dlowwa,
I have a question about a recent rejection ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8326977 )
The motive was about vignetting and I clearly understand why they would think I added some vignetting to the photo but I didn't. Here is the original, and you can clearly see that that's how it came out straight from the camera:
Is there anything I can do about it?
Thanks!
That's like getting a rejection for soft and saying "I didn't make it soft, the original was soft when it came out of the camera".
Just because you didn't intentionally add something to the image doesn't mean it should be acceptable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
You didn't add it, but it's there, so...
That's like getting a rejection for soft and saying "I didn't make it soft, the original was soft when it came out of the camera".
Just because you didn't intentionally add something to the image doesn't mean it should be acceptable.
So in this case would it be fine if some vignetting is added in post-prod to make up for the way the photo came out originally?
Comment
-
Originally posted by LBASTARDO View Post
Fair point.
So in this case would it be fine if some vignetting is added in post-prod to make up for the way the photo came out originally?
Comment
Comment