lbastardo // Pre-screening advice

[LBASTARDO]

hey its me again - i was wondering if i could get some advice on this photo please? i'm not 100% sold on the crop. Thanks!

[dlowwa]

hey its me again - i was wondering if i could get some advice on this photo please? i'm not 100% sold on the crop. Thanks!

Too low in the frame, and borderline crop on the right.

[LBASTARDO]

Too low in the frame, and borderline crop on the right.

how about now?

[dlowwa]

how about now?

Centering ok, but not the best crop on the right.

[LBASTARDO]

hey all!

have a question about a recent rejection - it says "Bad Info: Airline" but usually for aircrafts like this Private works, I don't know what would be in this case. On the FAA website it says the owner is "HERITAGE ASSET LEASING LLC", should the airline be that? Even FR24 says the owner is "Private".

Thanks!

[dlowwa]

hey all!

have a question about a recent rejection - it says "Bad Info: Airline" but usually for aircrafts like this Private works, I don't know what would be in this case. On the FAA website it says the owner is "HERITAGE ASSET LEASING LLC", should the airline be that? Even FR24 says the owner is "Private".

Thanks!

Operator is easily visible on the aircraft. Please use that.

[LBASTARDO]

hey, dlowwa ! had a question about this photo. first, i'd like to know if it's acceptable. and second, if it is, do i have to check "Small Prop" AND "Warbird/Vintage" or just small prop? Thanks!

[dlowwa]

hey, dlowwa ! had a question about this photo. first, i'd like to know if it's acceptable. and second, if it is, do i have to check "Small Prop" AND "Warbird/Vintage" or just small prop? Thanks!

Soft and borderline contrast. Small Prop and Vintage apply.

[LBASTARDO]

Soft and borderline contrast. Small Prop and Vintage apply.

got it, thank you so much!

[LBASTARDO]

hi! question about a recent rejection -

this photo was rejected due to poor framing - i'd like to know if this v2 is better or if there's anything else i need to do about it.

thanks,
luis.

[dlowwa]

hi! question about a recent rejection -

this photo was rejected due to poor framing - i'd like to know if this v2 is better or if there's anything else i need to do about it.

I don't know.. the rejected one looks fine to me. New version is too low.

[LBASTARDO]

I don't know.. the rejected one looks fine to me. New version is too low.

so, do you think i could appeal this rejection?

[dlowwa]

so, do you think i could appeal this rejection?

Up to you. If I handled the appeal, I would accept it, but can't say the same for other senior screeners.

[LBASTARDO]

Up to you. If I handled the appeal, I would accept it, but can't say the same for other senior screeners.

so i appealed and it was rejected again - not an issue. however, the screener said it was too high, you said the v2 was too low. i'm confused on how to center helicopters, is there any rule of thumbs or anything at all?

while i have you, would this photo be acceptable? it might be borderline backlit but there was no more sun hitting the airport at the time so can it be considered "night shot"?
Thanks!

[dlowwa]

while i have you, would this photo be acceptable? it might be borderline backlit but there was no more sun hitting the airport at the time so can it be considered "night shot"?

Dark/contrast, and the horizon is badly off.