Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre screen Abdullah

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Abdullah Aviation
    replied
    Now okay?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Abdullah Aviation View Post
    Views on these?
    First a bit bright, and both a bit soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abdullah Aviation
    replied
    Views on these?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Abdullah Aviation View Post
    Sir how about this one? Previously rejected for horizon unlevel. Now horizon okay?
    Horizon looks fine, but soft, and identifiable faces usually means a motive rejection.

    Originally posted by Abdullah Aviation View Post
    And what about this one?
    Borderline soft/harsh contrast/vignetting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abdullah Aviation
    replied
    And what about this one?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Abdullah Aviation
    replied
    Sir how about this one? Previously rejected for horizon unlevel. Now horizon okay?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Abdullah Aviation View Post
    Expert advice on both of these. Can you tell what changes are needed to be done?
    They look acceptable to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abdullah Aviation
    replied
    Expert advice on both of these. Can you tell what changes are needed to be done?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Abdullah Aviation View Post
    Previously rejected for dark/underexposed. Also ticked the night shot category. The screener wrote belly not visible and no details. Thanks.
    Pretty certain this would be rejected for dark again (and soft).

    Leave a comment:


  • Abdullah Aviation
    replied
    Previously rejected for dark/underexposed. Also ticked the night shot category. The screener wrote belly not visible and no details. Thanks.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Abdullah Aviation
    replied
    Now seems okay. The second one rejected for contrast and sharpness. Thanks.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Abdullah Aviation View Post
    Expert opinion needed. Both rejected few moments ago. One with green livery for underexposed and undersharpened and other for underexposed and part of aircraft cut off. Changes have been made. Can you tell me if they are okay now?
    1) now it is overexposed and soft, contrast too harsh, the chopped off tip of the stabilizer a bit too distracting
    2) overexposed, contrast too harsh, noisy

    Leave a comment:


  • Abdullah Aviation
    replied
    Expert opinion needed. Both rejected few moments ago. One with green livery for underexposed and undersharpened and other for underexposed and part of aircraft cut off. Changes have been made. Can you tell me if they are okay now?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Abdullah Aviation View Post
    Changes have been made. Seems okay now?
    No, still soft and borderline vignetting & overprocessed for the poor dust removal.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abdullah Aviation
    replied
    Changes have been made. Seems okay now?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X