Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreening / postprocessing rejection advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Prescreening / postprocessing rejection advice

    Hello,

    I received this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8199663 but I don't understand the reason.
    Can somebody tell me more explications about this ?

    Thanks in advance
    Jean-Philippe

  • #2
    I'm not a screener, but when you equalize the photo or hit "Check for Dust" it's pretty easy to see editing halos around various parts of the plane, a result of over editing the photo and adjusting the shadows or highlights too much. I hope this helps

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
      Hello,

      I received this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8199663 but I don't understand the reason.
      Can somebody tell me more explications about this ?

      Thanks in advance
      Jean-Philippe
      As you see, halos are visible around the cockpit, gear, and engine
      Attached Files

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
        Hello,

        I received this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8199663 but I don't understand the reason.
        Can somebody tell me more explications about this ?

        Thanks in advance
        Jean-Philippe
        Pretty strong editing halos are visible.

        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks every body for your answers, it helps me well to understand my photo rejection.

          Comment


          • #6
            i have never understood why to reject a picture with invisible dust spots or halos ?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by ramimz View Post
              i have never understood why to reject a picture with invisible dust spots or halos ?
              They're not invisible, otherwise it wouldn't have been rejected.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                They're not invisible, otherwise it wouldn't have been rejected.
                Sorry, but they're invisible, you can see them only when you are using equalize on photoshop....

                but who is using equalize when visit the website ???

                do you see dust spot or halos on this picture ?

                Sorry, but i can't.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	12345.jpg
Views:	129
Size:	452.3 KB
ID:	1091730

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ramimz View Post

                  Sorry, but they're invisible, you can see them only when you are using equalize on photoshop....

                  but who is using equalize when visit the website ???

                  do you see dust spot or halos on this picture ?

                  Sorry, but i can't.

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	12345.jpg
Views:	129
Size:	452.3 KB
ID:	1091730
                  I understand you can't see anything, but I can, as could the two other screeners who rejected it, so..

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    ​​Hello,
                    I would like to have some advices for theses photos, could they be accepted by jetphotos ?​

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8203 329.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	1,006.4 KB
ID:	1092202Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8215 Alphajet E154 8-AL.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	797.1 KB
ID:	1092203Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8262 C135FR 497 31-CM.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	1,013.1 KB
ID:	1092204Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8285 Mirage 2000D 630 3-XD-.jpg
Views:	103
Size:	819.6 KB
ID:	1092205

                    Thank you by advance.

                    Jean-Philippe



                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
                      ​​Hello,
                      I would like to have some advices for theses photos, could they be accepted by jetphotos ?​

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8203 329.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	1,006.4 KB
ID:	1092202Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8215 Alphajet E154 8-AL.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	797.1 KB
ID:	1092203Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8262 C135FR 497 31-CM.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	1,013.1 KB
ID:	1092204Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8285 Mirage 2000D 630 3-XD-.jpg
Views:	103
Size:	819.6 KB
ID:	1092205

                      Thank you by advance.

                      Jean-Philippe


                      they look ok, maybe the last one is a bit soft

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
                        ​​Hello,
                        I would like to have some advices for theses photos, could they be accepted by jetphotos ?​

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8203 329.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	1,006.4 KB
ID:	1092202Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8215 Alphajet E154 8-AL.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	797.1 KB
ID:	1092203Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8262 C135FR 497 31-CM.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	1,013.1 KB
ID:	1092204Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8285 Mirage 2000D 630 3-XD-.jpg
Views:	103
Size:	819.6 KB
ID:	1092205

                        Thank you by advance.

                        Jean-Philippe


                        1. soft, too far (needs tighter crop), borderline overprocessed (editing halos)
                        2. soft
                        3. contrast, overprocessed
                        4. soft

                        When you get a chance, please read here, especially #4:

                        https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

                        I've merged your posts, but in the future, please post any further questions in the same thread, thank you.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Thanks for your advices.
                          I'm sorry, I don't have seen theses rules before posting. I'll do my best to respect them in the future.

                          About the photo 3, is it too much contrast or it is the opposite ?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
                            Thanks for your advices.
                            I'm sorry, I don't have seen theses rules before posting. I'll do my best to respect them in the future.

                            About the photo 3, is it too much contrast or it is the opposite ?
                            Contrast is a little too harsh (strong).

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Hi,

                              I have new edited the previous photos by trying to correct their defaults. For me it seems to be better but I would like have new advices, please.
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8203 329.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1092423Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8215 Alphajet E154 8-AL.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	785.7 KB
ID:	1092424Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8262 C135FR 497 31-CM_.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	901.7 KB
ID:	1092425Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8285 Mirage 2000D 630 3-XD_.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	768.7 KB
ID:	1092426

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X