Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreening / postprocessing rejection advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    Hi,

    I have new edited the previous photos by trying to correct their defaults. For me it seems to be better but I would like have new advices, please.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8203 329.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1092423Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8215 Alphajet E154 8-AL.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	785.7 KB
ID:	1092424Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8262 C135FR 497 31-CM_.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	901.7 KB
ID:	1092425Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8285 Mirage 2000D 630 3-XD_.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	768.7 KB
ID:	1092426
    All images are too soft for 1800pix.

    Comment


    • #17
      ​Hello

      I would like to have some advices about this photo, please.


      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8737 CE815 PIS-Lyon ATR42-500 Chalair F-GPYM.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	1.05 MB
ID:	1093942

      Thanks by advance.

      Jean-Philippe

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
        ​Hello

        I would like to have some advices about this photo, please.


        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8737 CE815 PIS-Lyon ATR42-500 Chalair F-GPYM.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	1.05 MB
ID:	1093942

        Thanks by advance.

        Jean-Philippe
        Hello Jean-Philippe,

        I'm not a screener but I think it's acceptable. If I check every quality points of the JetPhotos quality standards I can't find anything wrong.
        You can apply a little bit more sharpness if you want.

        Kind Regards
        Julian

        Comment


        • #19
          Thank you Julian, I will apply a bit more sharpness.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
            ​Hello

            I would like to have some advices about this photo, please.

            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8737 CE815 PIS-Lyon ATR42-500 Chalair F-GPYM.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	1.05 MB
ID:	1093942

            Thanks by advance.

            Jean-Philippe
            Editing halos are visible. Best to submit a version without them.

            Comment


            • #21
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8737 CE815 PIS-Lyon ATR42-500 Chalair F-GPYM.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1093997
              Hello,

              Thank you for your look, I didn't notice the halos.

              Here a new version, I think it's better for the halos, what do you think ?

              Jean-Philippe

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8737 CE815 PIS-Lyon ATR42-500 Chalair F-GPYM.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1093997
                Hello,

                Thank you for your look, I didn't notice the halos.

                Here a new version, I think it's better for the halos, what do you think ?

                Jean-Philippe
                Would be acceptable for me.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Thank you

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Hello,​

                    I would like to have some advices about theses photos, please:

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9484.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	1.51 MB
ID:	1095172Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9509.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	1.78 MB
ID:	1095173Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9531.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	1.18 MB
ID:	1095174

                    Thanks by advance.

                    Jean-Philippe SL

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
                      Hello,​

                      I would like to have some advices about theses photos, please:

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9484.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	1.51 MB
ID:	1095172Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9509.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	1.78 MB
ID:	1095173Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9531.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	1.18 MB
ID:	1095174

                      Thanks by advance.

                      Jean-Philippe SL
                      Hey!

                      The chopper is a bit high and small in frame (needs a closer crop), the small props are okay for me.

                      Regards and stay safe,
                      Julian
                      Best Regards from Germany,
                      Julian S.​

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
                        Hello,​

                        I would like to have some advices about theses photos, please:

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9484.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	1.51 MB
ID:	1095172Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9509.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	1.78 MB
ID:	1095173Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9531.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	1.18 MB
ID:	1095174

                        Thanks by advance.

                        Jean-Philippe SL
                        First and third slightly soft. For the chopper one check for dust spots, it's easy to let go some CMOS dust spots when confusing them with blown apart grass

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Hello,

                          Thanks you two for your advices, I tried to improve my photos by following them. Can you give me news advices about theses second versions:

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9484.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	1.41 MB
ID:	1095945

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9531.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	1.18 MB
ID:	1095946

                          I would like to submit two news photos:
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9782.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	943.8 KB
ID:	1095947
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8108 Belgian Air Force Dassault Falcon 7x OO-LUM.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	1.00 MB
ID:	1095948

                          Thanks by advance.

                          Best regards
                          Jean-Philippe SL

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
                            Hello,

                            Thanks you two for your advices, I tried to improve my photos by following them. Can you give me news advices about theses second versions:

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9484.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	1.41 MB
ID:	1095945

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9531.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	1.18 MB
ID:	1095946

                            I would like to submit two news photos:
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9782.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	943.8 KB
ID:	1095947
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8108 Belgian Air Force Dassault Falcon 7x OO-LUM.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	1.00 MB
ID:	1095948

                            Thanks by advance.

                            Best regards
                            Jean-Philippe SL
                            1. overprocessed (editing halos)
                            2-3 soft
                            4. overprocessed

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Thank you for your advice.
                              But can you explicit what do you mean by soft ? Is it about the contrast ?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
                                Thank you for your advice.
                                But can you explicit what do you mean by soft ? Is it about the contrast ?
                                No, it is about the sharpness.

                                https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...es-new-version

                                6.6 Soft

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X