Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreening / postprocessing rejection advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    Hello,

    I would like to have some advices about this following pictures please:
    1. dark, too far
    2. dark

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Hello,

    I would like to have some advices about this following pictures please:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4572_.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	665.9 KB
ID:	1116984Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4588_.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	718.2 KB
ID:	1116985

    Thank you in advance
    Jean-Philippe

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Okay, thank you I keep the photo like this.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    Hello,

    Okay, by using the posterize feature in CS6, I think to have reduced the halos, is it better ?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2294.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	777.5 KB
ID:	1111265

    I have two other photos to submit, please:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2266 Atlantique 2 16 Marine.jpg
Views:	58
Size:	1.12 MB
ID:	1111266Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2224.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	604.1 KB
ID:	1111267

    Thank you
    Jean-Philippe SL
    Still very slight halos on the first, but shouldn't be enough for a rejection. Other two are also ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Hello,

    Okay, by using the posterize feature in CS6, I think to have reduced the halos, is it better ?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2294.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	777.5 KB
ID:	1111265

    I have two other photos to submit, please:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2266 Atlantique 2 16 Marine.jpg
Views:	58
Size:	1.12 MB
ID:	1111266Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2224.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	604.1 KB
ID:	1111267

    Thank you
    Jean-Philippe SL

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    Hi,
    Thank you, here another version of the 737-400, is it better like this ?
    Don't see any noticeable difference.

    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    And a new photo, can I get advices please ?
    This one would also be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Hi,
    Thank you, here another version of the 737-400, is it better like this ?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2294.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	762.4 KB
ID:	1110913

    And a new photo, can I get advices please ?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2483 AT717 NTE-Casablanca Royal Air Maroc B737-8 CN-ROE.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	723.9 KB
ID:	1110914

    Jean-Philippe

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    Hello,

    I think that you have a better browser than me, so here is a new version of the CRJ reduced to 1500pix:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2281.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	602.8 KB
ID:	1110756

    Also, I submitt another photo, what do you think please ?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2294.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	737.5 KB
ID:	1110757

    Jean-Philippe SL
    Very slight editing halos on the nose of the second, but they would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Hello,

    I think that you have a better browser than me, so here is a new version of the CRJ reduced to 1500pix:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2281.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	602.8 KB
ID:	1110756

    Also, I submitt another photo, what do you think please ?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2294.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	737.5 KB
ID:	1110757

    Jean-Philippe SL

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    Thank you for your advice but I don't understand how do you find my photos too soft, do you look them with a particular software ? I know that is a frequent issue on my photos so I give attention to this subject, and the CRJ seems to be sharp on my screen...

    Jean-Philippe
    Usually most images are seen at full-size in a browser, no special software. Looking again at the CRJ I'll take back the 'definitely' and replace it with 'a bit' Overall it's not bad, though some softness shows towards the nose.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Thank you for your advice but I don't understand how do you find my photos too soft, do you look them with a particular software ? I know that is a frequent issue on my photos so I give attention to this subject, and the CRJ seems to be sharp on my screen...

    Jean-Philippe

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    Hello,

    Thank you for your help, I have reduced the photos to 1650pix for 1 and 2 and 1500pix, I think that is better now but what do you think please ?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2108 VY2972 Vueling Barcelona-NTE A320-214 EC-LVP.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	801.2 KB
ID:	1110279Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2134 XK321 Toulouse-NTE Air Corsica ATR42-500 F-HAIB.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	816.5 KB
ID:	1110280Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2169 TU209 NTE-Djerba div. Tunis Tunisair A319-112 TS-IMQ.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	796.6 KB
ID:	1110281

    And I would like to submit another photo to your judgement:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2281.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	872.1 KB
ID:	1110282

    Thank you
    Jean-Philippe
    1 & 3 ok for me; 2 I'm still not sure the quality is there for the size; 4 definitely too soft for that size. The conclusion I guess is for you to avoid anything larger than 1600 pix, and under 1500 would be better.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Hello,

    Thank you for your help, I have reduced the photos to 1650pix for 1 and 2 and 1500pix, I think that is better now but what do you think please ?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2108 VY2972 Vueling Barcelona-NTE A320-214 EC-LVP.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	801.2 KB
ID:	1110279Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2134 XK321 Toulouse-NTE Air Corsica ATR42-500 F-HAIB.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	816.5 KB
ID:	1110280Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2169 TU209 NTE-Djerba div. Tunis Tunisair A319-112 TS-IMQ.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	796.6 KB
ID:	1110281

    And I would like to submit another photo to your judgement:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2281.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	872.1 KB
ID:	1110282

    Thank you
    Jean-Philippe

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    Hello,

    I would like to have advices about these 3 photos
    All images are a bit too soft for 1800pix.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Hello,

    I would like to have advices about these 3 photos:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2108 VY2972 Vueling Barcelona-NTE A320-214 EC-LVP.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	913.2 KB
ID:	1110039Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2134 XK321 Toulouse-NTE Air Corsica ATR42-500 F-HAIB.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	948.7 KB
ID:	1110040Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2169 TU209 NTE-Djerba div. Tunis Tunisair A319-112 TS-IMQ.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	1,013.2 KB
ID:	1110041

    Jean-Philippe SL

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X