Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreening / postprocessing rejection advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8737 CE815 PIS-Lyon ATR42-500 Chalair F-GPYM.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1093997
    Hello,

    Thank you for your look, I didn't notice the halos.

    Here a new version, I think it's better for the halos, what do you think ?

    Jean-Philippe
    Would be acceptable for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8737 CE815 PIS-Lyon ATR42-500 Chalair F-GPYM.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1093997
    Hello,

    Thank you for your look, I didn't notice the halos.

    Here a new version, I think it's better for the halos, what do you think ?

    Jean-Philippe

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    ​Hello

    I would like to have some advices about this photo, please.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8737 CE815 PIS-Lyon ATR42-500 Chalair F-GPYM.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	1.05 MB
ID:	1093942

    Thanks by advance.

    Jean-Philippe
    Editing halos are visible. Best to submit a version without them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Thank you Julian, I will apply a bit more sharpness.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pilot8998
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    ​Hello

    I would like to have some advices about this photo, please.


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8737 CE815 PIS-Lyon ATR42-500 Chalair F-GPYM.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	1.05 MB
ID:	1093942

    Thanks by advance.

    Jean-Philippe
    Hello Jean-Philippe,

    I'm not a screener but I think it's acceptable. If I check every quality points of the JetPhotos quality standards I can't find anything wrong.
    You can apply a little bit more sharpness if you want.

    Kind Regards
    Julian

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    ​Hello

    I would like to have some advices about this photo, please.


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8737 CE815 PIS-Lyon ATR42-500 Chalair F-GPYM.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	1.05 MB
ID:	1093942

    Thanks by advance.

    Jean-Philippe

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    Hi,

    I have new edited the previous photos by trying to correct their defaults. For me it seems to be better but I would like have new advices, please.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8203 329.jpg
Views:	266
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1092423Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8215 Alphajet E154 8-AL.jpg
Views:	275
Size:	785.7 KB
ID:	1092424Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8262 C135FR 497 31-CM_.jpg
Views:	253
Size:	901.7 KB
ID:	1092425Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8285 Mirage 2000D 630 3-XD_.jpg
Views:	256
Size:	768.7 KB
ID:	1092426
    All images are too soft for 1800pix.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Hi,

    I have new edited the previous photos by trying to correct their defaults. For me it seems to be better but I would like have new advices, please.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8203 329.jpg
Views:	266
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1092423Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8215 Alphajet E154 8-AL.jpg
Views:	275
Size:	785.7 KB
ID:	1092424Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8262 C135FR 497 31-CM_.jpg
Views:	253
Size:	901.7 KB
ID:	1092425Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8285 Mirage 2000D 630 3-XD_.jpg
Views:	256
Size:	768.7 KB
ID:	1092426

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    Thanks for your advices.
    I'm sorry, I don't have seen theses rules before posting. I'll do my best to respect them in the future.

    About the photo 3, is it too much contrast or it is the opposite ?
    Contrast is a little too harsh (strong).

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Thanks for your advices.
    I'm sorry, I don't have seen theses rules before posting. I'll do my best to respect them in the future.

    About the photo 3, is it too much contrast or it is the opposite ?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    ​​Hello,
    I would like to have some advices for theses photos, could they be accepted by jetphotos ?​

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8203 329.jpg
Views:	346
Size:	1,006.4 KB
ID:	1092202Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8215 Alphajet E154 8-AL.jpg
Views:	324
Size:	797.1 KB
ID:	1092203Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8262 C135FR 497 31-CM.jpg
Views:	301
Size:	1,013.1 KB
ID:	1092204Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8285 Mirage 2000D 630 3-XD-.jpg
Views:	323
Size:	819.6 KB
ID:	1092205

    Thank you by advance.

    Jean-Philippe


    1. soft, too far (needs tighter crop), borderline overprocessed (editing halos)
    2. soft
    3. contrast, overprocessed
    4. soft

    When you get a chance, please read here, especially #4:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

    I've merged your posts, but in the future, please post any further questions in the same thread, thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • gigglflyniki
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    ​​Hello,
    I would like to have some advices for theses photos, could they be accepted by jetphotos ?​

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8203 329.jpg
Views:	346
Size:	1,006.4 KB
ID:	1092202Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8215 Alphajet E154 8-AL.jpg
Views:	324
Size:	797.1 KB
ID:	1092203Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8262 C135FR 497 31-CM.jpg
Views:	301
Size:	1,013.1 KB
ID:	1092204Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8285 Mirage 2000D 630 3-XD-.jpg
Views:	323
Size:	819.6 KB
ID:	1092205

    Thank you by advance.

    Jean-Philippe


    they look ok, maybe the last one is a bit soft

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    ​​Hello,
    I would like to have some advices for theses photos, could they be accepted by jetphotos ?​

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8203 329.jpg
Views:	346
Size:	1,006.4 KB
ID:	1092202Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8215 Alphajet E154 8-AL.jpg
Views:	324
Size:	797.1 KB
ID:	1092203Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8262 C135FR 497 31-CM.jpg
Views:	301
Size:	1,013.1 KB
ID:	1092204Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8285 Mirage 2000D 630 3-XD-.jpg
Views:	323
Size:	819.6 KB
ID:	1092205

    Thank you by advance.

    Jean-Philippe



    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ramimz View Post

    Sorry, but they're invisible, you can see them only when you are using equalize on photoshop....

    but who is using equalize when visit the website ???

    do you see dust spot or halos on this picture ?

    Sorry, but i can't.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	12345.jpg
Views:	207
Size:	452.3 KB
ID:	1091730
    I understand you can't see anything, but I can, as could the two other screeners who rejected it, so..

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X