Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreening / postprocessing rejection advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    I didn't often see photos with portrait orientation on JP so I was not sure that is accepted. But yes in the case of this photo this could be better:
    Crop works much better for me, but there is a loss of quality with the larger crop. Somewhat soft & noisy now. Could also be a bit brighter.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    I didn't often see photos with portrait orientation on JP so I was not sure that is accepted. But yes in the case of this photo this could be better:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2141_.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	813.0 KB
ID:	1139584

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    Thank you, I have cropped closer to the plane like this, is it better ?
    Yes, but not sure why you aren't using a 4:3 crop, or even a portrait orientation. As it is the centering looks off. Would need brightening as well if you get the crop sorted out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Thank you, I have cropped closer to the plane like this, is it better ?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2141.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	836.7 KB
ID:	1139386

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    Hello,

    I would like to have an advice about this picture, please:
    A lot of empty space, but quality otherwise looks decent to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Hello,

    I would like to have an advice about this picture, please:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2141.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	811.8 KB
ID:	1139230

    Jean-Philippe

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Okay, thank you for your answer. I will try with a little bit lower resolution.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    Hello,

    I propose a new versions of the precedent pictures and with a new one:
    These would be ok for me, but I could see someone potentially thinking them a bit soft for the resolution.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Hello,

    I propose a new versions of the precedent pictures and with a new one:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0830 IB3440 Madrid-ORY Iberia A330-302 EC-LYF.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	716.2 KB
ID:	1138518Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0616.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	1.21 MB
ID:	1138519Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9956 AirArabia 3O301 Fes-BOD A320 CN-NMO_.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	815.2 KB
ID:	1138520Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0943.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	665.1 KB
ID:	1138521

    Thank you in advance
    Jean-Philippe

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    Thank you. I had tried to make my Air arabia better, is it better like this ?
    And, what do you think about theses new one, please:
    1. dark/harsh contrast
    2. too far
    3. borderline soft/contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Thank you. I had tried to make my Air arabia better, is it better like this ?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9956 AirArabia 3O301 Fes-BOD A320 CN-NMO__.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	879.4 KB
ID:	1137113

    And, what do you think about theses new one, please:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0616.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	1.22 MB
ID:	1137114Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0830 IB3440 Madrid-ORY Iberia A330-302 EC-LYF.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	697.3 KB
ID:	1137115

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    Thank you for your previous advices, I tried to make 2 and 3 better, what do you think about ?

    And I would to submit this new one
    1-2. borderline soft, better chance at lower resolution
    3. contrast too harsh

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    Thank you for your previous advices, I tried to make 2 and 3 better, what do you think about ?
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0192.jpg Views:	0 Size:	720.2 KB ID:	1137042 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0161 Caracal EC725 SK 2802 FAF.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	969.1 KB
ID:	1137056

    And I would to submit this new one:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_9956 AirArabia 3O301 Fes-BOD A320 CN-NMO_.jpg Views:	0 Size:	944.5 KB ID:	1137043

    Have a good day
    Jean-Philippe

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
    ​Hello !

    I would like to have an advice about theses following pictures, please:
    1. dark/contrast, soft
    2. centering/too far
    3. overprocessed

    Leave a comment:


  • Jean-Philippe SL
    replied
    ​Hello !

    I would like to have an advice about theses following pictures, please:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0126.jpg
Views:	56
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1134943Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0161.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	973.9 KB
ID:	1134944Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0192.jpg
Views:	58
Size:	766.2 KB
ID:	1134945

    Thank you in advance
    Jean-Philippe

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X