Prescreening / postprocessing rejection advice

[dlowwa]

Here some news versions, are they better like this ?

And I would like to submit this third pic, please:

Quality looks ok for me.

[Jean-Philippe SL]

Hello,

Thank you for your critics.
Here some news versions, are they better like this ?


And I would like to submit this third pic, please:



Thank you
Jean-Philippe

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I would like to have some advices about this following pictures please:

1. dark, too far
2. dark

[Jean-Philippe SL]

Hello,

I would like to have some advices about this following pictures please:



Thank you in advance
Jean-Philippe

[Jean-Philippe SL]

Okay, thank you I keep the photo like this.

[dlowwa]

Hello,

Okay, by using the posterize feature in CS6, I think to have reduced the halos, is it better ?



I have two other photos to submit, please:



Thank you
Jean-Philippe SL

Still very slight halos on the first, but shouldn't be enough for a rejection. Other two are also ok for me.

[Jean-Philippe SL]

Hello,

Okay, by using the posterize feature in CS6, I think to have reduced the halos, is it better ?



I have two other photos to submit, please:



Thank you
Jean-Philippe SL

[dlowwa]

Hi,
Thank you, here another version of the 737-400, is it better like this ?

Don't see any noticeable difference.

And a new photo, can I get advices please ?

This one would also be ok for me.

[Jean-Philippe SL]

Hi,
Thank you, here another version of the 737-400, is it better like this ?



And a new photo, can I get advices please ?



Jean-Philippe

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I think that you have a better browser than me, so here is a new version of the CRJ reduced to 1500pix:



Also, I submitt another photo, what do you think please ?



Jean-Philippe SL

Very slight editing halos on the nose of the second, but they would be ok for me.

[Jean-Philippe SL]

Hello,

I think that you have a better browser than me, so here is a new version of the CRJ reduced to 1500pix:



Also, I submitt another photo, what do you think please ?



Jean-Philippe SL

[dlowwa]

Thank you for your advice but I don't understand how do you find my photos too soft, do you look them with a particular software ? I know that is a frequent issue on my photos so I give attention to this subject, and the CRJ seems to be sharp on my screen...

Jean-Philippe

Usually most images are seen at full-size in a browser, no special software. Looking again at the CRJ I'll take back the 'definitely' and replace it with 'a bit' Overall it's not bad, though some softness shows towards the nose.

[Jean-Philippe SL]

Thank you for your advice but I don't understand how do you find my photos too soft, do you look them with a particular software ? I know that is a frequent issue on my photos so I give attention to this subject, and the CRJ seems to be sharp on my screen...

Jean-Philippe

[dlowwa]

Hello,

Thank you for your help, I have reduced the photos to 1650pix for 1 and 2 and 1500pix, I think that is better now but what do you think please ?



And I would like to submit another photo to your judgement:



Thank you
Jean-Philippe

1 & 3 ok for me; 2 I'm still not sure the quality is there for the size; 4 definitely too soft for that size. The conclusion I guess is for you to avoid anything larger than 1600 pix, and under 1500 would be better.

[Jean-Philippe SL]

Hello,

Thank you for your help, I have reduced the photos to 1650pix for 1 and 2 and 1500pix, I think that is better now but what do you think please ?



And I would like to submit another photo to your judgement:



Thank you
Jean-Philippe