Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1429 6.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	694.8 KB
ID:	1094420Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1373 2.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	642.5 KB
ID:	1094419 Advice for these two will be appreciated. Thank you

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1429 6.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	694.8 KB
ID:	1094420Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1373 2.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	642.5 KB
ID:	1094419 Advice for these two will be appreciated. Thank you
      They would be rejected for soft, contrast, dark, color, and compression. Second one also seems to have something in the top left corner.

      Comment


      • #18
        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1429-2.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	550.6 KB
ID:	1094491 An improvement?

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1429-2.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	550.6 KB
ID:	1094491 An improvement?
          It is brighter and sharper, but the contrast, color, and compression/noise issues remain.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

            It is brighter and sharper, but the contrast, color, and compression/noise issues remain.
            Is there any specific areas for those issues you could point out & any advice if possible.
            - Thank you again

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post

              Is there any specific areas for those issues you could point out & any advice if possible.
              - Thank you again
              There is an orange tint. Contrast is muted because of the overcast conditions. Noise/compression likely due to either camera or save settings.

              Comment


              • #22
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1635.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	725.1 KB
ID:	1095192Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1682.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	628.0 KB
ID:	1095193Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1595.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	1,023.0 KB
ID:	1095194Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1581.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1095195Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1690.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	596.6 KB
ID:	1095196 Feedback/advice for these would be appreciated as I plan to queue these five shortly,
                Thank you!

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1635.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	725.1 KB
ID:	1095192Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1682.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	628.0 KB
ID:	1095193Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1595.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	1,023.0 KB
ID:	1095194Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1581.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1095195Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1690.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	596.6 KB
ID:	1095196 Feedback/advice for these would be appreciated as I plan to queue these five shortly,
                  Thank you!
                  1. borderline soft
                  2. borderline dark
                  3. tiny bit of obstruction on nose wheel
                  4. ok for me
                  5. dark

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                    1. borderline soft
                    2. borderline dark
                    3. tiny bit of obstruction on nose wheel
                    4. ok for me
                    5. dark
                    Thank you.
                    I do hold some concern over obstruction around the nose gear for the CargoJet, as well as noise with the Star Air & Swiftair (ATR), Judging from those concerns, do your views/feedback & advice alter?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post

                      Thank you.
                      I do hold some concern over obstruction around the nose gear for the CargoJet, as well as noise with the Star Air & Swiftair (ATR), Judging from those concerns, do your views/feedback & advice alter?
                      No.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1645.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	685.6 KB
ID:	1095449Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1175.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	459.2 KB
ID:	1095450 Thank you Dlowwa!
                        Feedback on these two would also be appreciated
                        - Thanks again

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1645.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	685.6 KB
ID:	1095449Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1175.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	459.2 KB
ID:	1095450 Thank you Dlowwa!
                          Feedback on these two would also be appreciated
                          - Thanks again
                          1. ok for me
                          2. contrast, not fixable.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Unsure as whether to create a separate topic for this.
                            I had this rejection earlier today regarding dust. The spot isn’t/is just barely visible on the image, but can just be made out on the ‘check for dust’ tool. Could this be suitable for an appeal?
                            - Thanks again!

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	85F5334D-9E9F-4DE3-A131-A6ABDA506B1E.jpeg
Views:	15
Size:	736.0 KB
ID:	1095523Click image for larger version

Name:	F13681CE-CF13-4D13-8360-344A19463351.jpeg
Views:	20
Size:	692.0 KB
ID:	1095522

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
                              Unsure as whether to create a separate topic for this.
                              I had this rejection earlier today regarding dust. The spot isn’t/is just barely visible on the image, but can just be made out on the ‘check for dust’ tool. Could this be suitable for an appeal?
                              I guess it depends on which side of the "isn't/is" side you sit. If the former yes, if the latter no.

                              Comment


                              • #30

                                Hi,
                                I has this rejection this morning regarding “over-processed / bad post-processing”, although I’m not entirely sure what that term signifies, nor if I agree. Any assistance on both those questions would be greatly appreciated
                                - Thanks
                                Attached is ‘check for dust’ tool & original image
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	6346B9CB-1EF3-453B-A244-ED445E2FC94B.jpeg
Views:	8
Size:	797.7 KB
ID:	1096155Click image for larger version

Name:	43016CEA-DDA3-44F4-8A26-5064AE807082.jpeg
Views:	16
Size:	612.0 KB
ID:	1096154

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X