Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31

    Hi,
    I has this rejection this morning regarding “over-processed / bad post-processing”, although I’m not entirely sure what that term signifies, nor if I agree. Any assistance on both those questions would be greatly appreciated
    - Thanks
    Attached is ‘check for dust’ tool & original image
    Click image for larger version

Name:	6346B9CB-1EF3-453B-A244-ED445E2FC94B.jpeg
Views:	8
Size:	797.7 KB
ID:	1096155Click image for larger version

Name:	43016CEA-DDA3-44F4-8A26-5064AE807082.jpeg
Views:	15
Size:	612.0 KB
ID:	1096154

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
      Hi,
      I has this rejection this morning regarding “over-processed / bad post-processing”, although I’m not entirely sure what that term signifies, nor if I agree. Any assistance on both those questions would be greatly appreciated
      - Thanks
      Attached is ‘check for dust’ tool & original image
      Click image for larger version

Name:	6346B9CB-1EF3-453B-A244-ED445E2FC94B.jpeg
Views:	8
Size:	797.7 KB
ID:	1096155Click image for larger version

Name:	43016CEA-DDA3-44F4-8A26-5064AE807082.jpeg
Views:	15
Size:	612.0 KB
ID:	1096154
      Don't see any major issues with processing, at least anything that should cause a rejection.

      Comment


      • #33
        ..and I'll kindly ask you to read here one more time VERY CAREFULLY, especially #8

        https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

        Thank you.

        Comment


        • #34
          Okay, thank you. My apologies
          Advice/pre-screening on this would be appreciated,
          - Thank you. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1896.jpg
Views:	56
Size:	749.4 KB
ID:	1096920

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
            Okay, thank you. My apologies
            Advice/pre-screening on this would be appreciated,
            - Thank you. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1896.jpg
Views:	56
Size:	749.4 KB
ID:	1096920
            Noisy, and slightly high in the frame.

            Comment


            • #36
              Hi again,
              feedback on these three would be appreciated. I’m particularly concerned on potential overexposure of the ASL 737-400, and contrast/lighting for both Jet2 aircraft.
              Thank you!
              Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2096.jpg Views:	0 Size:	557.7 KB ID:	1097386Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2158.jpg Views:	0 Size:	460.6 KB ID:	1097387Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2092.jpg Views:	0 Size:	472.0 KB ID:	1097388

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
                Hi again,
                feedback on these three would be appreciated. I’m particularly concerned on potential overexposure of the ASL 737-400, and contrast/lighting for both Jet2 aircraft.
                Thank you!
                Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_2096.jpg Views:	0 Size:	557.7 KB ID:	1097386Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_2158.jpg Views:	0 Size:	460.6 KB ID:	1097387Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_2092.jpg Views:	0 Size:	472.0 KB ID:	1097388
                1. dark/contrast
                2-3 contrast. not fixable.

                Comment


                • #38
                  I'd appreciate any feedback on this. My main concerns regard possible contrast/overexposure/obstruction issues
                  - Thank You
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1879.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	808.1 KB
ID:	1097830

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
                    I'd appreciate any feedback on this. My main concerns regard possible contrast/overexposure/obstruction issues
                    - Thank You
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1879.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	808.1 KB
ID:	1097830
                    No obstruction, but contrast is very borderline.

                    Comment


                    • #40

                      I’m unsure as to whether a separate thread is required, so please remove/correct me if so.
                      i’ve had this rejection recently regarding dust spots & “over-processed / bad postprocessing”. I have since identified & rectified the dust issue + cleared some excess noise, but not sure on what the processing issue is, nor how exactly to resolve it. Advice would as always be greatly appreciated
                      - Thank You

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	B0617F2D-5836-4382-8FA3-6F9CDBDC7A1B.jpeg
Views:	31
Size:	777.3 KB
ID:	1097907Click image for larger version

Name:	8B5EE832-C941-45E6-95ED-3830BF68947A.jpeg
Views:	33
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1097908
                      Attached Files

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
                        I’m unsure as to whether a separate thread is required, so please remove/correct me if so.
                        i’ve had this rejection recently regarding dust spots & “over-processed / bad postprocessing”. I have since identified & rectified the dust issue + cleared some excess noise, but not sure on what the processing issue is, nor how exactly to resolve it. Advice would as always be greatly appreciated
                        - Thank You

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	B0617F2D-5836-4382-8FA3-6F9CDBDC7A1B.jpeg
Views:	31
Size:	777.3 KB
ID:	1097907Click image for larger version

Name:	8B5EE832-C941-45E6-95ED-3830BF68947A.jpeg
Views:	33
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1097908
                        Editing halos visible around the tail and roof of the building.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Hi again,
                          I'd appreciate feedback for these three prior to queuing. My main concerns regard contrast & noise
                          - Thank you!

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6642.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	636.6 KB
ID:	1098905Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1055.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	917.0 KB
ID:	1098906Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1069.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1098907

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
                            Hi again,
                            I'd appreciate feedback for these three prior to queuing. My main concerns regard contrast & noise
                            - Thank you!

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6642.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	636.6 KB
ID:	1098905Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1055.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	917.0 KB
ID:	1098906Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1069.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1098907
                            1) blurry, noisy
                            2, 3) soft
                            My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Hi again,
                              Some photos from different weather conditions I'd appreciate feedback from.
                              Thank you!
                              Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2107.jpg Views:	0 Size:	505.1 KB ID:	1099073Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3128.jpg Views:	0 Size:	605.7 KB ID:	1099074Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_1899.jpg Views:	0 Size:	646.2 KB ID:	1099076

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
                                Hi again,
                                Some photos from different weather conditions I'd appreciate feedback from.
                                Thank you!
                                Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_2107.jpg Views:	0 Size:	505.1 KB ID:	1099073Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_3128.jpg Views:	0 Size:	605.7 KB ID:	1099074Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_1899.jpg Views:	0 Size:	646.2 KB ID:	1099076
                                1. contrast
                                2. soft, dirty, borderline dark
                                3. ok for me

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X