Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Hi again,
    feedback on these three would be appreciated. I’m particularly concerned on potential overexposure of the ASL 737-400, and contrast/lighting for both Jet2 aircraft.
    Thank you!
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2096.jpg Views:	0 Size:	557.7 KB ID:	1097386Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2158.jpg Views:	0 Size:	460.6 KB ID:	1097387Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2092.jpg Views:	0 Size:	472.0 KB ID:	1097388

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Okay, thank you. My apologies
    Advice/pre-screening on this would be appreciated,
    - Thank you. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1896.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	749.4 KB
ID:	1096920
    Noisy, and slightly high in the frame.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Okay, thank you. My apologies
    Advice/pre-screening on this would be appreciated,
    - Thank you. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1896.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	749.4 KB
ID:	1096920

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    ..and I'll kindly ask you to read here one more time VERY CAREFULLY, especially #8

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

    Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Hi,
    I has this rejection this morning regarding “over-processed / bad post-processing”, although I’m not entirely sure what that term signifies, nor if I agree. Any assistance on both those questions would be greatly appreciated
    - Thanks
    Attached is ‘check for dust’ tool & original image
    Click image for larger version

Name:	6346B9CB-1EF3-453B-A244-ED445E2FC94B.jpeg
Views:	11
Size:	797.7 KB
ID:	1096155Click image for larger version

Name:	43016CEA-DDA3-44F4-8A26-5064AE807082.jpeg
Views:	22
Size:	612.0 KB
ID:	1096154
    Don't see any major issues with processing, at least anything that should cause a rejection.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied

    Hi,
    I has this rejection this morning regarding “over-processed / bad post-processing”, although I’m not entirely sure what that term signifies, nor if I agree. Any assistance on both those questions would be greatly appreciated
    - Thanks
    Attached is ‘check for dust’ tool & original image
    Click image for larger version

Name:	6346B9CB-1EF3-453B-A244-ED445E2FC94B.jpeg
Views:	11
Size:	797.7 KB
ID:	1096155Click image for larger version

Name:	43016CEA-DDA3-44F4-8A26-5064AE807082.jpeg
Views:	22
Size:	612.0 KB
ID:	1096154

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Unsure as whether to create a separate topic for this.
    I had this rejection earlier today regarding dust. The spot isn’t/is just barely visible on the image, but can just be made out on the ‘check for dust’ tool. Could this be suitable for an appeal?
    I guess it depends on which side of the "isn't/is" side you sit. If the former yes, if the latter no.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Unsure as whether to create a separate topic for this.
    I had this rejection earlier today regarding dust. The spot isn’t/is just barely visible on the image, but can just be made out on the ‘check for dust’ tool. Could this be suitable for an appeal?
    - Thanks again!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	85F5334D-9E9F-4DE3-A131-A6ABDA506B1E.jpeg
Views:	18
Size:	736.0 KB
ID:	1095523Click image for larger version

Name:	F13681CE-CF13-4D13-8360-344A19463351.jpeg
Views:	27
Size:	692.0 KB
ID:	1095522

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1645.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	685.6 KB
ID:	1095449Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1175.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	459.2 KB
ID:	1095450 Thank you Dlowwa!
    Feedback on these two would also be appreciated
    - Thanks again
    1. ok for me
    2. contrast, not fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1645.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	685.6 KB
ID:	1095449Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1175.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	459.2 KB
ID:	1095450 Thank you Dlowwa!
    Feedback on these two would also be appreciated
    - Thanks again

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post

    Thank you.
    I do hold some concern over obstruction around the nose gear for the CargoJet, as well as noise with the Star Air & Swiftair (ATR), Judging from those concerns, do your views/feedback & advice alter?
    No.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. borderline soft
    2. borderline dark
    3. tiny bit of obstruction on nose wheel
    4. ok for me
    5. dark
    Thank you.
    I do hold some concern over obstruction around the nose gear for the CargoJet, as well as noise with the Star Air & Swiftair (ATR), Judging from those concerns, do your views/feedback & advice alter?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1635.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	725.1 KB
ID:	1095192Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1682.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	628.0 KB
ID:	1095193Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1595.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	1,023.0 KB
ID:	1095194Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1581.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1095195Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1690.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	596.6 KB
ID:	1095196 Feedback/advice for these would be appreciated as I plan to queue these five shortly,
    Thank you!
    1. borderline soft
    2. borderline dark
    3. tiny bit of obstruction on nose wheel
    4. ok for me
    5. dark

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1635.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	725.1 KB
ID:	1095192Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1682.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	628.0 KB
ID:	1095193Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1595.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	1,023.0 KB
ID:	1095194Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1581.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1095195Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1690.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	596.6 KB
ID:	1095196 Feedback/advice for these would be appreciated as I plan to queue these five shortly,
    Thank you!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post

    Is there any specific areas for those issues you could point out & any advice if possible.
    - Thank you again
    There is an orange tint. Contrast is muted because of the overcast conditions. Noise/compression likely due to either camera or save settings.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X