Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    I'd appreciate feedback on this if possible, thank you!
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2665.jpg Views:	0 Size:	780.2 KB ID:	1099261

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
      I'd appreciate feedback on this if possible, thank you!
      Not a crew.
      I noticed the color is a bit greenish (fixable) and noise.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
        I'd appreciate feedback on this if possible, thank you!
        Slightly high in the frame, but otherwise should be ok.

        Comment


        • #49
          Advice on these two is much appreciated, thank you!
          My main issues concern contrast & possible halos
          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2214.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	539.5 KB
ID:	1099848Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2021.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	598.5 KB
ID:	1099847

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
            Advice on these two is much appreciated, thank you!
            My main issues concern contrast & possible halos
            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2214.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	539.5 KB
ID:	1099848Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2021.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	598.5 KB
ID:	1099847
            1) soft, overexposed, noise
            2) soft, overexposed
            My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

            Comment


            • #51
              Hi again,
              I'd appreciate pre-screening advice on this please. I understand the image is somewhat soft as per the night/low-light conditions, although I have seen multiple night shots accepted & excused of their slightly softer nature, so hoping this wouldn't cause too significant of an impact.
              Kindest regards,
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2486.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	598.2 KB
ID:	1101421

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
                Hi again,
                I'd appreciate pre-screening advice on this please. I understand the image is somewhat soft as per the night/low-light conditions, although I have seen multiple night shots accepted & excused of their slightly softer nature, so hoping this wouldn't cause too significant of an impact.
                Kindest regards,
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2486.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	598.2 KB
ID:	1101421
                Hi,

                unfortunately its too soft, nearly blurry.

                Best Regards from Germany,
                Julian S.​

                Comment


                • #53
                  Appreciated as always
                  Any advice on these three as well would also be appreciated. Two of these images (TUI + Ryanair) I have previously requested & since improved.
                  Kindest regards, Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	699.2 KB
ID:	1101487Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693-2.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1101488Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	1,023.9 KB
ID:	1101489

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
                    Appreciated as always
                    Any advice on these three as well would also be appreciated. Two of these images (TUI + Ryanair) I have previously requested & since improved.
                    Kindest regards, Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	699.2 KB
ID:	1101487Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693-2.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1101488Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	1,023.9 KB
ID:	1101489
                    All borderline oversharpened; first also a bit dark.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Click image for larger version  Name:	image_36406.jpg Views:	3 Size:	424.0 KB ID:	1103817Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_1043-3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	378.1 KB ID:	1103818Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0920.jpg Views:	0 Size:	659.9 KB ID:	1103816Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0939.jpg Views:	0 Size:	759.9 KB ID:	1103815
                      Hi again,
                      I’d highly appreciate advice on these four.
                      my concerns include
                      -Halos (Ryanair + ASL)
                      -Soft (Ryanair + Jet2)
                      -Contrast (Iberia + Jet2)

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
                        Click image for larger version Name:	image_36406.jpg Views:	3 Size:	424.0 KB ID:	1103817Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_1043-3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	378.1 KB ID:	1103818Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_0920.jpg Views:	0 Size:	659.9 KB ID:	1103816Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_0939.jpg Views:	0 Size:	759.9 KB ID:	1103815
                        Hi again,
                        I’d highly appreciate advice on these four.
                        my concerns include
                        -Halos (Ryanair + ASL)
                        -Soft (Ryanair + Jet2)
                        -Contrast (Iberia + Jet2)
                        1. overprocessed, harsh contrast
                        2. borderline harsh contrast
                        3. soft/blurry
                        4. borderline soft/contrast

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X