Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    It is brighter and sharper, but the contrast, color, and compression/noise issues remain.
    Is there any specific areas for those issues you could point out & any advice if possible.
    - Thank you again

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1429-2.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	550.6 KB
ID:	1094491 An improvement?
    It is brighter and sharper, but the contrast, color, and compression/noise issues remain.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1429-2.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	550.6 KB
ID:	1094491 An improvement?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1429 6.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	694.8 KB
ID:	1094420Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1373 2.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	642.5 KB
ID:	1094419 Advice for these two will be appreciated. Thank you
    They would be rejected for soft, contrast, dark, color, and compression. Second one also seems to have something in the top left corner.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1429 6.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	694.8 KB
ID:	1094420Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1373 2.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	642.5 KB
ID:	1094419 Advice for these two will be appreciated. Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Would you say that’s too much or too little contrast for the two? Thank you
    Poor contrast due to overcast conditions. Not fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post

    1: soft, contrast, slightly overexposed
    2: soft, contrast
    Would you say that’s too much or too little contrast for the two? Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Hi. May I have feedback on these two please
    - ThanksClick image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1158.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	945.7 KB
ID:	1094163
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_1175 4.jpg Views:	0 Size:	594.3 KB ID:	1094162
    1: soft, contrast, slightly overexposed
    2: soft, contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied

    Hi. May I have feedback on these two please
    - ThanksClick image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1158.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	945.7 KB
ID:	1094163
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_1175 4.jpg Views:	0 Size:	594.3 KB ID:	1094162

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan
    Oh right, thank you. Apologies for the consistent requests, although now I feel I am beginning to understand a sense of editing & tweaking for JetPhotos uploads
    I plan to add these two to my queue shortly, so any feedback & constructive criticism would be welcomed
    - Thanks
    Both are quite soft and have very noticeable purple fringing.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Great, thank you. Would you mind reviewing these as well?
    Please read here carefully when you get the chance, especially #3:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

    Will answer these, but in the future such requests will likely be ignored.

    1. soft/blurry, contrast, noise, color
    2. soft, contrast
    3-4. soft
    5. contrast, horizon

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Great, thank you. Would you mind reviewing these as well?Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_1250.jpg Views:	23 Size:	621.2 KB ID:	1093901Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_1106 2.jpg Views:	22 Size:	974.3 KB ID:	1093900Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_8620 3.jpg Views:	22 Size:	783.3 KB ID:	1093899Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_8547.jpg Views:	22 Size:	882.6 KB ID:	1093898

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1211 4.jpg
Views:	109
Size:	589.3 KB
ID:	1093833Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1106.jpg
Views:	112
Size:	992.7 KB
ID:	1093832Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8546.jpg
Views:	112
Size:	944.9 KB
ID:	1093831Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0672 2.jpg
Views:	118
Size:	959.8 KB
ID:	1093830Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0645 3.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	925.5 KB
ID:	1093829 Can you view these?
    1. contrast, noise. not fixable.
    2. oversharpened, noise, borderline contrast
    3. borderline noise/centering (too low)
    4. noise, contrast
    5. noise, contrast, soft

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1211 4.jpg
Views:	109
Size:	589.3 KB
ID:	1093833Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1106.jpg
Views:	112
Size:	992.7 KB
ID:	1093832Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8546.jpg
Views:	112
Size:	944.9 KB
ID:	1093831Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0672 2.jpg
Views:	118
Size:	959.8 KB
ID:	1093830Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0645 3.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	925.5 KB
ID:	1093829 Can you view these?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Alright, thank you. Advice on these five would also be very much appreciated
    Image links are not working.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X