Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Found from my previous camera. Do these bear any chance of acceptance?
    Not much chance.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693-126.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	708.9 KB
ID:	1105854Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693-129.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	681.0 KB
ID:	1105855Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693-128.jpg
Views:	13
Size:	723.3 KB
ID:	1105856Found from my previous camera. Do these bear any chance of acceptance?
    Thank you again

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    I'd appreciate reassurance & advice on these if possible
    -Jet2 (contrast not salvageable?)
    -RVL (acceptable as silhouette shot?)
    -Star Air (halo/processing issues)
    -Ryanair (some contrast uncertainty)
    -CargoJet (obstruction too high?)
    1. soft, borderline contrast
    2. borderline dark/contrast, fence somewhat distracting
    3. overprocessed, dirty, centering
    4. soft, borderline overprocessed
    5. obstruction

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2693.jpg Views:	0 Size:	671.9 KB ID:	1105264Click image for larger version  Name:	image_36885.jpg Views:	3 Size:	404.0 KB ID:	1105258Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2693-59.jpg Views:	0 Size:	414.7 KB ID:	1105261Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2693-5.jpg Views:	0 Size:	664.7 KB ID:	1105262Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2693-3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	717.6 KB ID:	1105259Final few for a while. I’d appreciate reassurance & advice on these if possible
    -Jet2 (contrast not salvageable?)
    -RVL (acceptable as silhouette shot?)
    -Star Air (halo/processing issues)
    -Ryanair (some contrast uncertainty)
    -CargoJet (obstruction too high?)

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Feedback on these four would be appreciated. I have listed my concerns
    - West Atlantic/DHL (halos/processing)
    - ASL (halos/processing)
    - West Atlantic (contrast/sharpening)
    - Air Ambulance (contrast)
    1. borderline overprocessed
    2. overprocessed
    3. manipulation/overprocessed
    4. contrast/overexposed

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693-13.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	410.9 KB
ID:	1104761Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693-29.jpg
Views:	13
Size:	427.5 KB
ID:	1104762Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693-32.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	640.7 KB
ID:	1104763Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693-22.jpg
Views:	13
Size:	893.4 KB
ID:	1104764Hi again.
    Feedback on these four would be appreciated. I have listed my concerns
    - West Atlantic/DHL (halos/processing)
    - ASL (halos/processing)
    - West Atlantic (contrast/sharpening)
    - Air Ambulance (contrast)

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post

    Thank you again Dlowwa, is much appreciated. But might I ask if possible for you to elaborate a little on the issues regarding 1 & 5? I believe I see at least to some extent these issues but would just like a little clarification
    Bad edit of the sky in #1, either poor dust spot removal, or removal of something else. #5 looks like you've added a filter to darken the sky.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Borderline dark/contrast on #3, but might be workable. 2 & 4 have no chance due to the light, and 1 & 5 have bad edits manipulation/overprocessing.
    Thank you again Dlowwa, is much appreciated. But might I ask if possible for you to elaborate a little on the issues regarding 1 & 5? I believe I see at least to some extent these issues but would just like a little clarification

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Hi again,
    I have these images of more poor light conditions I'd much appreciate feedback & advice for.
    - Kindest regards
    Borderline dark/contrast on #3, but might be workable. 2 & 4 have no chance due to the light, and 1 & 5 have bad edits manipulation/overprocessing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693-6.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	544.9 KB
ID:	1104421Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2693-4.jpg Views:	0 Size:	614.2 KB ID:	1104410Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2693-2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	700.5 KB ID:	1104411Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2693-5.jpg Views:	0 Size:	679.5 KB ID:	1104412Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2693-6.jpg Views:	0 Size:	778.9 KB ID:	1104413
    Hi again,
    I have these images of more poor light conditions I'd much appreciate feedback & advice for.
    - Kindest regards

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Click image for larger version Name:	image_36406.jpg Views:	3 Size:	424.0 KB ID:	1103817Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_1043-3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	378.1 KB ID:	1103818Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_0920.jpg Views:	0 Size:	659.9 KB ID:	1103816Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_0939.jpg Views:	0 Size:	759.9 KB ID:	1103815
    Hi again,
    I’d highly appreciate advice on these four.
    my concerns include
    -Halos (Ryanair + ASL)
    -Soft (Ryanair + Jet2)
    -Contrast (Iberia + Jet2)
    1. overprocessed, harsh contrast
    2. borderline harsh contrast
    3. soft/blurry
    4. borderline soft/contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Click image for larger version  Name:	image_36406.jpg Views:	3 Size:	424.0 KB ID:	1103817Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_1043-3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	378.1 KB ID:	1103818Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0920.jpg Views:	0 Size:	659.9 KB ID:	1103816Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0939.jpg Views:	0 Size:	759.9 KB ID:	1103815
    Hi again,
    I’d highly appreciate advice on these four.
    my concerns include
    -Halos (Ryanair + ASL)
    -Soft (Ryanair + Jet2)
    -Contrast (Iberia + Jet2)

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Appreciated as always
    Any advice on these three as well would also be appreciated. Two of these images (TUI + Ryanair) I have previously requested & since improved.
    Kindest regards, Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	699.2 KB
ID:	1101487Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693-2.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1101488Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	1,023.9 KB
ID:	1101489
    All borderline oversharpened; first also a bit dark.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Appreciated as always
    Any advice on these three as well would also be appreciated. Two of these images (TUI + Ryanair) I have previously requested & since improved.
    Kindest regards, Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	699.2 KB
ID:	1101487Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693-2.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1101488Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2693.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	1,023.9 KB
ID:	1101489

    Leave a comment:


  • Julian S.
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Hi again,
    I'd appreciate pre-screening advice on this please. I understand the image is somewhat soft as per the night/low-light conditions, although I have seen multiple night shots accepted & excused of their slightly softer nature, so hoping this wouldn't cause too significant of an impact.
    Kindest regards,
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2486.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	598.2 KB
ID:	1101421
    Hi,

    unfortunately itīs too soft, nearly blurry.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X