Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    I'd appreciate feedback on this if possible, thank you!
    Slightly high in the frame, but otherwise should be ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • MQ1131
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    I'd appreciate feedback on this if possible, thank you!
    Not a crew.
    I noticed the color is a bit greenish (fixable) and noise.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    I'd appreciate feedback on this if possible, thank you!
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2665.jpg Views:	0 Size:	780.2 KB ID:	1099261

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Hi again,
    Some photos from different weather conditions I'd appreciate feedback from.
    Thank you!
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_2107.jpg Views:	0 Size:	505.1 KB ID:	1099073Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_3128.jpg Views:	0 Size:	605.7 KB ID:	1099074Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_1899.jpg Views:	0 Size:	646.2 KB ID:	1099076
    1. contrast
    2. soft, dirty, borderline dark
    3. ok for me

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Hi again,
    Some photos from different weather conditions I'd appreciate feedback from.
    Thank you!
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2107.jpg Views:	0 Size:	505.1 KB ID:	1099073Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3128.jpg Views:	0 Size:	605.7 KB ID:	1099074Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_1899.jpg Views:	0 Size:	646.2 KB ID:	1099076

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Hi again,
    I'd appreciate feedback for these three prior to queuing. My main concerns regard contrast & noise
    - Thank you!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6642.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	636.6 KB
ID:	1098905Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1055.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	917.0 KB
ID:	1098906Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1069.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1098907
    1) blurry, noisy
    2, 3) soft

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Hi again,
    I'd appreciate feedback for these three prior to queuing. My main concerns regard contrast & noise
    - Thank you!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6642.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	636.6 KB
ID:	1098905Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1055.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	917.0 KB
ID:	1098906Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1069.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1098907

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    I’m unsure as to whether a separate thread is required, so please remove/correct me if so.
    i’ve had this rejection recently regarding dust spots & “over-processed / bad postprocessing”. I have since identified & rectified the dust issue + cleared some excess noise, but not sure on what the processing issue is, nor how exactly to resolve it. Advice would as always be greatly appreciated
    - Thank You

    Click image for larger version

Name:	B0617F2D-5836-4382-8FA3-6F9CDBDC7A1B.jpeg
Views:	30
Size:	777.3 KB
ID:	1097907Click image for larger version

Name:	8B5EE832-C941-45E6-95ED-3830BF68947A.jpeg
Views:	32
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1097908
    Editing halos visible around the tail and roof of the building.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied

    I’m unsure as to whether a separate thread is required, so please remove/correct me if so.
    i’ve had this rejection recently regarding dust spots & “over-processed / bad postprocessing”. I have since identified & rectified the dust issue + cleared some excess noise, but not sure on what the processing issue is, nor how exactly to resolve it. Advice would as always be greatly appreciated
    - Thank You

    Click image for larger version

Name:	B0617F2D-5836-4382-8FA3-6F9CDBDC7A1B.jpeg
Views:	30
Size:	777.3 KB
ID:	1097907Click image for larger version

Name:	8B5EE832-C941-45E6-95ED-3830BF68947A.jpeg
Views:	32
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1097908
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    I'd appreciate any feedback on this. My main concerns regard possible contrast/overexposure/obstruction issues
    - Thank You
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1879.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	808.1 KB
ID:	1097830
    No obstruction, but contrast is very borderline.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    I'd appreciate any feedback on this. My main concerns regard possible contrast/overexposure/obstruction issues
    - Thank You
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1879.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	808.1 KB
ID:	1097830

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Hi again,
    feedback on these three would be appreciated. I’m particularly concerned on potential overexposure of the ASL 737-400, and contrast/lighting for both Jet2 aircraft.
    Thank you!
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_2096.jpg Views:	0 Size:	557.7 KB ID:	1097386Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_2158.jpg Views:	0 Size:	460.6 KB ID:	1097387Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_2092.jpg Views:	0 Size:	472.0 KB ID:	1097388
    1. dark/contrast
    2-3 contrast. not fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Hi again,
    feedback on these three would be appreciated. I’m particularly concerned on potential overexposure of the ASL 737-400, and contrast/lighting for both Jet2 aircraft.
    Thank you!
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2096.jpg Views:	0 Size:	557.7 KB ID:	1097386Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2158.jpg Views:	0 Size:	460.6 KB ID:	1097387Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2092.jpg Views:	0 Size:	472.0 KB ID:	1097388

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Toby Geoghegan View Post
    Okay, thank you. My apologies
    Advice/pre-screening on this would be appreciated,
    - Thank you. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1896.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	749.4 KB
ID:	1096920
    Noisy, and slightly high in the frame.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toby Geoghegan
    replied
    Okay, thank you. My apologies
    Advice/pre-screening on this would be appreciated,
    - Thank you. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1896.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	749.4 KB
ID:	1096920

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X