Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

gdinscoll - post screening\rejection advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
    Hi,

    Had this rejected for bad motive, is it because of the faces in the background? If so, what can I do for this image to be acceptable, as its the only one I have of this type, which isn't in the database yet, the manipulation was to remove the scratches amongst the faces which I tried to do as best as possible, which I have uploaded a photo of the unedited version

    Cheers

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8977196
    I think it might be the NR filter you used? It's the guy in the yellow shirt who looks like his face has been blurred. The guy sitting doesn't look that bad. Motive should be ok given the age, so should be fixable if you feel like putting in the effort of giving it a better edit.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

      I think it might be the NR filter you used? It's the guy in the yellow shirt who looks like his face has been blurred. The guy sitting doesn't look that bad. Motive should be ok given the age, so should be fixable if you feel like putting in the effort of giving it a better edit.
      Is that NR for noise reduction? As I haven't applied any filters, and yes I see what you mean about the yellow guys face, but if you see the original attached it is the same with no modifications. the noise reduction level I have used to remove the grain from the scan has caused his face to seem blurred

      Comment


      • Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
        Is that NR for noise reduction?
        Yes.

        Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
        As I haven't applied any filters..
        Ok, but..

        Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
        ..the noise reduction level I have used to remove the grain from the scan has caused his face to seem blurred
        So..bit confused. NR used or not??

        Comment


        • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

          Yes.



          Ok, but..



          So..bit confused. NR used or not??
          Ah, my apologies, I understood filters as some sort of blanket edit to the photo. Noise reduction as usual for negative scanning, as you can see from the original photo it was required no?

          Also, I just had two photos rejected for backlit, although they are still well lit, surely the new registrations are taking the backlit into account, as there are many photos that are in the database that are clearly backlit even those that have numerous photos already under that registration

          When there are new registrations I do upload the best lit photos as I can, but sometimes there is only one photo of the aircraft, such as these two

          Culprit images:

          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8978503
          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8978475

          Cheers

          Comment


          • Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post

            Ah, my apologies, I understood filters as some sort of blanket edit to the photo. Noise reduction as usual for negative scanning, as you can see from the original photo it was required no?

            Also, I just had two photos rejected for backlit, although they are still well lit, surely the new registrations are taking the backlit into account, as there are many photos that are in the database that are clearly backlit even those that have numerous photos already under that registration

            When there are new registrations I do upload the best lit photos as I can, but sometimes there is only one photo of the aircraft, such as these two

            Culprit images:

            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8978503
            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8978475

            Cheers
            Yes, if you appealed those, I would accept them given age/rarity..but that's just me.

            Comment


            • Thanks for your help, I have a question on this photo. Would it be best to upload it as untitled or with the previous owner Everts?
              Attached Files

              Comment


              • Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
                Thanks for your help, I have a question on this photo. Would it be best to upload it as untitled or with the previous owner Everts?
                You'd probably get a more definitive answer asking the DB editors, since this is the processing forum, but my guess would be Untitled.

                Comment


                • Hi

                  I appealed this photo but as I'm not receiving emails I cannot see any appeal comments: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8981027

                  I assume the bad info was the registration, because the aircraft has the code written on it, and I have provided multiple references to show the registration is as listed in the upload details if you could provide some info that I am unable to see that would be great

                  Cheers

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
                    Hi

                    I appealed this photo but as I'm not receiving emails I cannot see any appeal comments: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8981027

                    I assume the bad info was the registration, because the aircraft has the code written on it, and I have provided multiple references to show the registration is as listed in the upload details if you could provide some info that I am unable to see that would be great

                    Cheers
                    Hello.

                    Yes, its because of the registration. Please use the reg which is shown on the Aircraft itself - "NC17667"

                    Regdards
                    Best Regards from Germany,
                    Julian S.​

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Julian S. View Post

                      Hello.

                      Yes, its because of the registration. Please use the reg which is shown on the Aircraft itself - "NC17667"

                      Regdards
                      Hi Julian, I understand, but as I said in the appeal, that is the code of the aircraft not the registration, as the FAA website says N17667 is the registration, there is a load of photos of aircraft with registrations not using the second letter on the aircraft which would be the same here. Surely we are to use the registration and not the aircraft code?

                      Cheers

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post

                        Hi Julian, I understand, but as I said in the appeal, that is the code of the aircraft not the registration, as the FAA website says N17667 is the registration, there is a load of photos of aircraft with registrations not using the second letter on the aircraft which would be the same here. Surely we are to use the registration and not the aircraft code?

                        Cheers
                        As previously stated, we prefer as displayed on the aircraft. There are multiple examples of NC- regs. (and NX- for that matter) on the DB if you check.

                        Comment


                        • Hi,

                          had this rejected, before I appeal as I believe everything is correct could you mention what is "bad" https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8990197

                          Incase its the aircraft type, it has Air Wolf written on the side but that name is interchangeable with Iskierka: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PZL_M26_Iskierka

                          Cheers

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
                            Hi,

                            had this rejected, before I appeal as I believe everything is correct could you mention what is "bad" https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8990197

                            Incase its the aircraft type, it has Air Wolf written on the side but that name is interchangeable with Iskierka: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PZL_M26_Iskierka

                            Cheers
                            Hmmm.. there was a comment left for you, which should be visible on your rejected images page, but I can see that it is not. In that case..

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	FireShot Capture 1141 -  - www.jetphotos.com.png
Views:	48
Size:	28.4 KB
ID:	1111701

                            Comment


                            • Afternoon,

                              Out of curiosity, would this shot be accepted? Im conscious of the backlight, but as its an air 2 air and its well lit I'm wondering if it would be sufficient, I have already uploaded one (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10095796), but on the other side, and would like to publish this one with a different background so I assume it wouldn't fall into the 'similar' rejection category

                              Cheers

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
                                Afternoon,

                                Out of curiosity, would this shot be accepted? Im conscious of the backlight, but as its an air 2 air and its well lit I'm wondering if it would be sufficient, I have already uploaded one (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10095796), but on the other side, and would like to publish this one with a different background so I assume it wouldn't fall into the 'similar' rejection category

                                Cheers
                                Depending on age/rarity, it may be.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X