Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

gdinscoll - post screening\rejection advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Like previously mentioned I don’t receive any submission result emails so I’m not sure if there was any additional comments to this rejection but as it’s a new registration I’d unsure why this would be classed as invalid hot?


    cheers
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8284846

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    The appeals says "Exposure ok, but strong yellow cast."
    Thank you. I don't know where you fit in the admin side of the website, but are you able to help me with this email problem? I did submit a message to the admin side about my problem, but as I don't receive submission/appeal result emails I do not know if I will even receive an email responding to my message

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post

    Cheers.

    I had appealed this Air China (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8258209) because I felt the exposure was correct, and any more exposure would've caused heavy highlight clipping and the darkness of the grey skies is not something that should be changed. The colour wasn't edited in the processing of this photograph so I was a little unsure what caused that to be a reason for rejection too.

    As I mentioned I haven't been receiving emails and so I haven't seen why the appeal was declined, are you able to give me some advice on it? Thanks!
    The appeals says "Exposure ok, but strong yellow cast."

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    2584
    Cheers.

    I had appealed this Air China (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8258209) because I felt the exposure was correct, and any more exposure would've caused heavy highlight clipping and the darkness of the grey skies is not something that should be changed. The colour wasn't edited in the processing of this photograph so I was a little unsure what caused that to be a reason for rejection too.

    As I mentioned I haven't been receiving emails and so I haven't seen why the appeal was declined, are you able to give me some advice on it? Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll

    Thanks!

    This was rejected due to colour, but I have not amended it whilst editing, is it because of the yellow belly? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8260615 I feel that isn't the fault of the photo when an aircraft is either dirty or reflects the colour from the ground
    Whole image is yellow, not just the underside of the aircraft.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post

    Thanks, are you able to tell me what serial number I had put for this photo as it appears serial numbers never seem to appear on photos that get rejected. Cheers.
    2584

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Interesting. Not sure exactly what happened, as a comment was left with the rejection. In any case, the comment indicated the correct cn for this airframe: 3584.
    Thanks, are you able to tell me what serial number I had put for this photo as it appears serial numbers never seem to appear on photos that get rejected. Cheers.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post

    Evening. No, no screener comment on the rejected list. I haven’t been receiving emails for about 5-7 days from the JP screening results email, at first I thought it was a delayed bug. But after today still no submission results email came through.
    Interesting. Not sure exactly what happened, as a comment was left with the rejection. In any case, the comment indicated the correct cn for this airframe: 3584.

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    In fact a comment was left with the correct cn. Can you not see it in either the rejection email or on your list of rejected images?
    Evening. No, no screener comment on the rejected list. I haven’t been receiving emails for about 5-7 days from the JP screening results email, at first I thought it was a delayed bug. But after today still no submission results email came through.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
    Hello,

    I had this photo rejected for bad info, but no screener comment was left to indicate what the bad info was. Is anyone able to enlighten me?

    Cheers

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8279026
    In fact a comment was left with the correct cn. Can you not see it in either the rejection email or on your list of rejected images?

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Hello,

    I had this photo rejected for bad info, but no screener comment was left to indicate what the bad info was. Is anyone able to enlighten me?

    Cheers

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8279026

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    I think you've answered your own question:

    Just seems odd the guidelines essentially penalises you for blurring a face that potentially leads to identification but you must blur a number plate for privacy reasons

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post

    Okay, so if I was to remove the blur the photo can be reconsidered?
    I think you've answered your own question:

    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
    ...can’t have visibly recognised people in a photo

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Those were the guidelines we were given by FR24. Previously, neither would have been acceptable, but FR24 indicated to us that blurring car plates only would be ok.
    Okay, so if I was to remove the blur the photo can be reconsidered?

    seems like a catch-22. Can blur plates but not faces but can’t have visibly recognised people in a photo

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
    Evening all.

    I had a photo rejected because I had slightly blurred out the face of a person in the background of the photograph. I did this so I didn't 'expose an easily identifiable person' as per the upload guidelines 3.4.3 and thought it may have lead to rejection for this reason if I hadn't of done so.

    Looking at the guidelines following the rejection, it says that "Blurring the (car number) plate to a minimum which makes the plate unreadable is accepted." Out of curiosity how come blurring out a person's face isn't allowed?

    Cheers!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8272242
    Those were the guidelines we were given by FR24. Previously, neither would have been acceptable, but FR24 indicated to us that blurring car plates only would be ok.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X