Originally posted by gdinscoll
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
gdinscoll - post screening\rejection advice
Collapse
X
-
Morning, I had this photo rejected due to overexposure,https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8367082, would this be an acceptable adjustment?
Comment
-
Originally posted by gdinscoll View PostMorning, I had this photo rejected due to overexposure,https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8367082, would this be an acceptable adjustment?
Comment
-
evening, I uploaded a very old photo dated in 1968 but I do not know the day/month date exactly, I mistakenly wrote its date as 01/01/1968 because a lot of the “dateless” photos in the database are labelled as 0/0/0000, which I guess was a very old setting on the website.
i should’ve checked the delivery and first flight of the aircraft which turned out to be in March 68, which the screener rightly puts my 01/01/1968 as “bad info”.
How would I go about uploading a photo where there is no trace online of the event taking place? Is it possible to label the date as “0/0/000” and then in the photo remarks state the year 1968? Or do I just put “01/08/1968” as that would then be after the aircraft was delivered?
thanks
Comment
-
Originally posted by gdinscoll View Postevening, I uploaded a very old photo dated in 1968 but I do not know the day/month date exactly, I mistakenly wrote its date as 01/01/1968 because a lot of the “dateless” photos in the database are labelled as 0/0/0000, which I guess was a very old setting on the website.
i should’ve checked the delivery and first flight of the aircraft which turned out to be in March 68, which the screener rightly puts my 01/01/1968 as “bad info”.
How would I go about uploading a photo where there is no trace online of the event taking place? Is it possible to label the date as “0/0/000” and then in the photo remarks state the year 1968? Or do I just put “01/08/1968” as that would then be after the aircraft was delivered?
thanks
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8529049
Comment
-
Originally posted by JamesDC152 View PostEvening, would it be possible to upload this with the category as RAMP? and a wider crop than usual to allow the spectators in the crop as it was a huge turnout for the Concorde's visit to Leeds
Comment
-
Evening all,
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8541910
I had this rejected for grain yet I have had other photos accepted with a similar degree of grain, I know there is a proportion of grain but with the age of the negative slides surely this is common and given the rarity of the photo it is taken into consideration? Especially as the guidelines say that a "lower standards are applied" for any scans
What can be done for it?
Cheers
Comment
-
Originally posted by gdinscoll View PostEvening all,
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8541910
I had this rejected for grain yet I have had other photos accepted with a similar degree of grain, I know there is a proportion of grain but with the age of the negative slides surely this is common and given the rarity of the photo it is taken into consideration? Especially as the guidelines say that a "lower standards are applied" for any scans
What can be done for it?
Cheers
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
I'm going to accept this one given it's a new reg., but when looking at poorer quality old scans, we need to balance age and rarity with just how bad it is as well as how easy it would be to fix. Somethings like color, centering and leveling are relatively easy to fix, even for scanned slides/negatives. Grain is something that's a bit harder, but honestly, I'd bet this particular one would have been relatively easy to clean up. Something to consider with future uploads
Comment
-
Evening,
Would this negative be acceptable with the small obstruction? If so, should it be submitted under hot as there is no photo in the database that has the airframe in these colours and under the "Canadian Airlines" airline: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/keyword/C-FCRB
reg: C-FCRB
Secondly, would the reflection on the left-hand side cause this Korean to be rejected?
Cheers
Comment
-
Originally posted by gdinscoll View PostEvening,
Would this negative be acceptable with the small obstruction? If so, should it be submitted under hot as there is no photo in the database that has the airframe in these colours and under the "Canadian Airlines" airline: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/keyword/C-FCRB
reg: C-FCRB
Secondly, would the reflection on the left-hand side cause this Korean to be rejected?
Cheers
Comment
-
Originally posted by gdinscoll View PostMorning,
I have a few negatives that seem to have developed some sort of central vignetting on the negative itself. I have attempted to edit them out, would such defects still be acceptable as a scanned upload?
Thanks
Comment
Comment