Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

gdinscoll - post screening\rejection advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    You'd probably do better to ask in the photo info forum than in digital editing.
    Yeah I did, just didn't get a response

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
    Another question if someone can assist.

    I want to upload a photo of this specific aircraft https://airlinersgallery.smugmug.com...rbor/i-TB9KhGD

    Would the airline need to be created in the database: Eastern Express (Bar Harbor) or would it be correct to tag the airline as bar Harbour which is currently listed?

    Cheers
    You'd probably do better to ask in the photo info forum than in digital editing.

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Another question if someone can assist.

    I want to upload a photo of this specific aircraft https://airlinersgallery.smugmug.com...rbor/i-TB9KhGD

    Would the airline need to be created in the database: Eastern Express (Bar Harbor) or would it be correct to tag the airline as bar Harbour which is currently listed?

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post

    Haha, again I apologise, the photo that was rejected shall I wait for that to be overturned and now accepted based on the reasoning I gave you. Or are you meaning I have to re-upload it with the info provided in the screener comments.
    Please reupload it with comments providing support for the date you ascribe to the image.

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Yes, I understood that, and was commenting as such.
    Haha, again I apologise, the photo that was rejected shall I wait for that to be overturned and now accepted based on the reasoning I gave you. Or are you meaning I have to re-upload it with the info provided in the screener comments.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post

    Apologies, I mean the one this one that was rejected.
    Yes, I understood that, and was commenting as such.

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    As long as a reasonable explanation is provided, I don't see why not.
    Apologies, I mean the one this one that was rejected.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post

    Yeah that is fair enough, however, I wouldn't want a cloud over the account for reliability with dates. I think it's only been one or two errors and can you blame it when the dates are more than 40 years ago, would that photo be accepted?
    As long as a reasonable explanation is provided, I don't see why not.

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    In that case, good to include such info when uploading as all we have to go on is the delivery date, and you will have to admit not all of the dates on your uploads have been completely reliable, so you'll excuse us if we can't trust them completely without this kind of evidence
    Yeah that is fair enough, however, I wouldn't want a cloud over the account for reliability with dates. I think it's only been one or two errors and can you blame it when the dates are more than 40 years ago, would that photo be accepted?
    Last edited by gdinscoll; 2020-11-03, 20:15. Reason: e

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post

    In this case I believe the aircraft was in the transition of being repainted into its new colors from its previous airline and so the aircraft was captured in Miami on that date, all the dates are strictly written after the photos were taken and so I do not think the date was incorrect.
    In that case, good to include such info when uploading as all we have to go on is the delivery date, and you will have to admit not all of the dates on your uploads have been completely reliable, so you'll excuse us if we can't trust them completely without this kind of evidence

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    It seems unlikely this was taken today, wouldn't you agree? Might be useful to check the data yourself to see if you can find any obvious errors.



    Also the date. This aircraft was delivered to Zuliana on 20 Oct 1989 so it seems unlikely the image was taken prior to that.
    In this case I believe the aircraft was in the transition of being repainted into its new colors from its previous airline and so the aircraft was captured in Miami on that date, all the dates are strictly written after the photos were taken and so I do not think the date was incorrect.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
    It seems unlikely this was taken today, wouldn't you agree? Might be useful to check the data yourself to see if you can find any obvious errors.

    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8578463
    Also the date. This aircraft was delivered to Zuliana on 20 Oct 1989 so it seems unlikely the image was taken prior to that.

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    And these please?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8578419

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8578463
    (if this is aircraft type I have selected the one that JetPhotos has in its database (https://www.jetphotos.com/info/DC-8-45640) So I am unsure what is wrong here)

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
    Hi I had this rejected for Bad info but the screener didn't leave what was "bad" - could a screener check and pass it on?

    Cheers

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8577668
    Airline.

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Hi I had this rejected for Bad info but the screener didn't leave what was "bad" - could a screener check and pass it on?

    Cheers

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8577668

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X