Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

gdinscoll - post screening\rejection advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
    Evening,

    With this photo can I upload it under the KLM reg? Or would a ramp shot be suitable for the crop type. I didn't want to centralise the KLM and crop out two other DC-9s but understand there's a bit of leeway regarding crops,

    Cheers
    Not a Ramp shot. Please use the info for the KLM.

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Evening,

    With this photo can I upload it under the KLM reg? Or would a ramp shot be suitable for the crop type. I didn't want to centralise the KLM and crop out two other DC-9s but understand there's a bit of leeway regarding crops,

    Cheers
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
    Evening,

    would this fence/wire cause a rejection under obstruction on this photo?

    Cheers
    Normally, absolutely yes. There are already 8 images of this reg. on the DB, which makes it uncommon, but not exactly very rare. As such, I would say that yes, even with age/rarity factored in, still likely an obstruction rejection.

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Evening,

    would this fence/wire cause a rejection under obstruction on this photo?

    Cheers
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Just saw your reply, I understand that is the old website layout right? If you were to go through a normal photographers reject section you wont see the serial (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9002749) not sure if you knew that.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post

    Ah, the one that doesn't come up! Thanks for info. How come it never shows on rejected photos the serial?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=9003127 ?

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    cn seems to be 46, not 126 as you entered.
    Ah, the one that doesn't come up! Thanks for info. How come it never shows on rejected photos the serial?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
    Hi

    Another bad info with no comment, can't find anything wrong with the details on the page, can you let me know what is bad?

    Cheers

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9003127
    cn seems to be 46, not 126 as you entered.

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Hi

    Another bad info with no comment, can't find anything wrong with the details on the page, can you let me know what is bad?

    Cheers

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9003127

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
    Afternoon,

    Out of curiosity, would this shot be accepted? Im conscious of the backlight, but as its an air 2 air and its well lit I'm wondering if it would be sufficient, I have already uploaded one (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10095796), but on the other side, and would like to publish this one with a different background so I assume it wouldn't fall into the 'similar' rejection category

    Cheers
    Depending on age/rarity, it may be.

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Afternoon,

    Out of curiosity, would this shot be accepted? Im conscious of the backlight, but as its an air 2 air and its well lit I'm wondering if it would be sufficient, I have already uploaded one (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10095796), but on the other side, and would like to publish this one with a different background so I assume it wouldn't fall into the 'similar' rejection category

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post
    Hi,

    had this rejected, before I appeal as I believe everything is correct could you mention what is "bad" https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8990197

    Incase its the aircraft type, it has Air Wolf written on the side but that name is interchangeable with Iskierka: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PZL_M26_Iskierka

    Cheers
    Hmmm.. there was a comment left for you, which should be visible on your rejected images page, but I can see that it is not. In that case..

    Click image for larger version

Name:	FireShot Capture 1141 -  - www.jetphotos.com.png
Views:	48
Size:	28.4 KB
ID:	1111701

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Hi,

    had this rejected, before I appeal as I believe everything is correct could you mention what is "bad" https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8990197

    Incase its the aircraft type, it has Air Wolf written on the side but that name is interchangeable with Iskierka: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PZL_M26_Iskierka

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by gdinscoll View Post

    Hi Julian, I understand, but as I said in the appeal, that is the code of the aircraft not the registration, as the FAA website says N17667 is the registration, there is a load of photos of aircraft with registrations not using the second letter on the aircraft which would be the same here. Surely we are to use the registration and not the aircraft code?

    Cheers
    As previously stated, we prefer as displayed on the aircraft. There are multiple examples of NC- regs. (and NX- for that matter) on the DB if you check.

    Leave a comment:


  • gdinscoll
    replied
    Originally posted by Julian S. View Post

    Hello.

    Yes, its because of the registration. Please use the reg which is shown on the Aircraft itself - "NC17667"

    Regdards
    Hi Julian, I understand, but as I said in the appeal, that is the code of the aircraft not the registration, as the FAA website says N17667 is the registration, there is a load of photos of aircraft with registrations not using the second letter on the aircraft which would be the same here. Surely we are to use the registration and not the aircraft code?

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X