Originally posted by gdinscoll
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
gdinscoll - post screening\rejection advice
Collapse
X
-
-
Hi,
Had this rejected for bad motive, is it because of the faces in the background? If so, what can I do for this image to be acceptable, as its the only one I have of this type, which isn't in the database yet, the manipulation was to remove the scratches amongst the faces which I tried to do as best as possible, which I have uploaded a photo of the unedited version
Cheers
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gdinscoll View PostMorning,
Would this photo be accepted? There isn't a photo in the database currently, and it was displaying various artifacts related to the aircraft so unfortunately not one without them in the way
This aircraft is the one Bill Signs completed several of his friendship flights around the world, landed on all 7 continents, and visited Russia, among other endeavors.
Cheers
Leave a comment:
-
Morning,
Would this photo be accepted? There isn't a photo in the database currently, and it was displaying various artifacts related to the aircraft so unfortunately not one without them in the way
This aircraft is the one Bill Signs completed several of his friendship flights around the world, landed on all 7 continents, and visited Russia, among other endeavors.
Cheers
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by gdinscoll View PostHi,
would this scan be acceptable with the scratch marks in the corner outside the aircraft, pretty annoyed as this is a nice photo and the scratches would be pretty impossible to amend
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
I screened that one. Aircraft type was missing on the screening page, but as it appears on the rejected image, must have been a bug. You can appeal it, and if the type shows up properly there, it will be accepted.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gdinscoll View PostHi, had this rejected for bad info, but I have no emails, can a screener say what was bad? I provided the data in the comments box about why it is submitted as Bolivian Air Force as it was bought by them https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8929379
Thanks
Leave a comment:
-
Hi, had this rejected for bad info, but I have no emails, can a screener say what was bad? I provided the data in the comments box about why it is submitted as Bolivian Air Force as it was bought by them https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8929379
Thanks
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gdinscoll View PostAfternoon,
got this rejected for bad info. Can a screener confirm if it is the type? As I was a little unsure which one to go for and went with the one that was already for this frame but under a different reg
thanks
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8917304
Leave a comment:
-
Afternoon,
got this rejected for bad info. Can a screener confirm if it is the type? As I was a little unsure which one to go for and went with the one that was already for this frame but under a different reg
thanks
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Hi, I handled your appeal.
That was indeed helpful, as it was enough to confirm that some editing had been done in the suspected areas.
No need to prove anything. As I mentioned on your appeal, there was no assumption there was anything malicious happening. We know it can be a challenge to clean up old scans, and we appreciate the effort you are making. On the other hand, such editing needs to be done carefully, lest it appear malicious, or even just unsightly.
Repeating patterns are visible in the lower right, and after comparing to the original scan, it's obvious these areas are indeed where some scratch repairs were done.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gdinscoll View PostAfternoon,
Originally posted by gdinscoll View PostI did include the unedited scan in the appeal,
Originally posted by gdinscoll View PostI also attach a few other un-edited photos which may help prove that I haven't done anything malicious
Originally posted by gdinscoll View PostAfternoon,
I had this photo rejected for digital manipulation and I appealed on the basis that I didn't grossly manipulate the photo which the screener deemed that I had done attaching the unedited photo as proof. I'd just like to know where the "lower right" area shows a manipulation that has caused the rejection?
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: