Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

chengcheng2 - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Hi,

    I want to request pre-screen for the following 3 pics:

    1.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC09136.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	761.9 KB
ID:	1113811
    2.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC09195.jpg
Views:	80
Size:	782.4 KB
ID:	1113812
    3.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC09278-2.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	1.59 MB
ID:	1113813

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by chengcheng2 View Post
      Hi,

      I want to request pre-screen for the following 3 pics:
      1-2. bit soft/noisy, but would be ok for me.
      3. soft, overprocessed

      Comment


      • #63
        Hi again, want to ask advice on the following pics:

        1. shot this from a distance, wondering if 1024px could still be of enough quality?
        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01670-Enhanced.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	444.7 KB
ID:	1115310

        2. There are very slight banding in the sky, but that is from the camera directly without any processing, I'm not sure if this will be a problem or not.
        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01803-3.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	1.11 MB
ID:	1115311

        3. similar as 2, but worse light
        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01970.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	832.3 KB
ID:	1115312

        Thanks in advance.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by chengcheng2 View Post
          Hi again, want to ask advice on the following pics:

          1. shot this from a distance, wondering if 1024px could still be of enough quality?
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01670-Enhanced.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	444.7 KB
ID:	1115310

          2. There are very slight banding in the sky, but that is from the camera directly without any processing, I'm not sure if this will be a problem or not.
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01803-3.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	1.11 MB
ID:	1115311

          3. similar as 2, but worse light
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01970.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	832.3 KB
ID:	1115312

          Thanks in advance.
          1. noisy
          2. borderline contrast
          3. contrast

          Comment


          • #65
            Thanks, I've chosen a different frame, would this be acceptable instead?
            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01957-3.jpg
Views:	59
Size:	975.3 KB
ID:	1115427

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by chengcheng2 View Post
              Thanks, I've chosen a different frame, would this be acceptable instead?
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01957-3.jpg
Views:	59
Size:	975.3 KB
ID:	1115427
              Pretty good chance that's still a contrast rejection.

              Comment


              • #67
                One last try on the original pic, how does this look?
                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01970.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	1.15 MB
ID:	1115520

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by chengcheng2 View Post
                  One last try on the original pic, how does this look?
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01970.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	1.15 MB
ID:	1115520
                  Would be a contrast rejection for me.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    regarding these rejects:

                    i checked the rgb histograms and thought they were ok, obviously this is not the case

                    1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9131288

                    is this ok?
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01094.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	1.24 MB
ID:	1115798
                    2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9131261
                    this picture also has an additional contrast reject
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01016.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	1.21 MB
ID:	1115799

                    Thanks

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by chengcheng2 View Post
                      regarding these rejects:

                      i checked the rgb histograms and thought they were ok, obviously this is not the case
                      Might want to check the regular histogram since that relates to exposure rather than color.

                      Originally posted by chengcheng2 View Post
                      is this ok?
                      Different frame. Softer, slight improvement to exposure.

                      Originally posted by chengcheng2 View Post
                      this picture also has an additional contrast reject
                      Exposure/contrast looks better.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                        Different frame. Softer, slight improvement to exposure.
                        oops, sorry

                        this is the same frame, added more light

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01096.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	1.19 MB
ID:	1115845

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by chengcheng2 View Post

                          oops, sorry

                          this is the same frame, added more light
                          Would be good enough for me.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Hi, want to ask advice on these 2 rejects:
                            1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9144097

                            I understand what the screener meant in the comments, however, if you look at the "Center" tool, I think its quite obvious how I centered my shot. I just used the top and bottom of the body as anchors. Also, it has been the way I've edited all my earlier shots.
                            Like these:
                            https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10168124
                            https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10137384
                            https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10156669

                            I don't know if this is just a screener preference or should I change the way I center my shots from now on. This would be quite a big deal for me.

                            2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9144111

                            This must be due to too much contrast, right? I still think this shot looks good already, I uploaded a few shots of the exact same location and editing and somehow this one got a reject.


                            Thanks in advance.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by chengcheng2 View Post
                              Hi, want to ask advice on these 2 rejects:
                              1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9144097

                              I understand what the screener meant in the comments, however, if you look at the "Center" tool, I think its quite obvious how I centered my shot. I just used the top and bottom of the body as anchors. Also, it has been the way I've edited all my earlier shots.
                              Think it's just the hump on the -47 that's throwing you off. If you exclude that, it is a bit low.

                              Originally posted by chengcheng2 View Post
                              This must be due to too much contrast, right? I still think this shot looks good already, I uploaded a few shots of the exact same location and editing and somehow this one got a reject.
                              More that it's nearly backlit. Slightly better angle of light and you should be ok.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                                Think it's just the hump on the -47 that's throwing you off. If you exclude that, it is a bit low.



                                More that it's nearly backlit. Slightly better angle of light and you should be ok.
                                Thank you for the explanation. Will these be more acceptable?

                                1. Does it have to be higher still? In this case, should I just ignore the hump entirely?
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00651.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	968.6 KB
ID:	1116272
                                2.
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00458.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	822.9 KB
ID:	1116273

                                3-5. new images for prescreen.

                                3.
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03440.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	1.19 MB
ID:	1116274
                                4.
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03406.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	1.16 MB
ID:	1116275
                                5.
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02877.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	1.13 MB
ID:	1116276

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X