Prescreening Request- Herison RK

[dlowwa]

I got 2 rejections (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8566345 and the link to the other one expired). Both due to contrast. I tried to fix both of them, and I wonder if it's now acceptable.

1.

2.

1. contrast still poor
2. blurry/oversharpened

Don't think either is fixable, sorry.

[HerisonRK]

I got 2 rejections (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8566345 and the link to the other one expired). Both due to contrast. I tried to fix both of them, and I wonder if it's now acceptable.

1.

2.

[LX-A343]

I had a rejection earlier due to blurry, soft and colour. (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8581586). Because blurry images can't be fixed, I tried editing a different picture of the same aircraft. But I don't know if it would get rejected for blurry again.

soft, harsh contrast (almost backlit) and overexposed.

[HerisonRK]

I had a rejection earlier due to blurry, soft and colour. (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8581586). Because blurry images can't be fixed, I tried editing a different picture of the same aircraft. But I don't know if it would get rejected for blurry again.

[HerisonRK]

Hello,

1. is oversharpened
2. seems to be partially soft, also little dark due to the angle of picture and sun

Stay Safe!

I can see where you're coming from for 2. I had a difficult time trying to find the right angle due to the sun being almost directly behind the aircraft.

[Julian S.]

I tried to re-edit 3 and added an extra picture, but I'm not sure if they are acceptable. And whether they're fixable.

1.

2.

Hello,

1. is oversharpened
2. seems to be partially soft, also little dark due to the angle of picture and sun

Stay Safe!

[HerisonRK]

I tried to re-edit 3 and added an extra picture, but I'm not sure if they are acceptable. And whether they're fixable.

1.

2.

[dlowwa]

I edited some pictures I took a few months ago but I'm sure if they would be acceptable

1. I sent this one a while ago for screening but it got rejected for centre and dark. I fixed it but I'm not sure if it's still dark

2.

3.

4. (for 3 and 4 I'm not sure if it would get rejected due to compression)

5.

1-2 contrast, color, oversharpened
3. contrast, oversharpened
4. ok for me
5. contrast, soft/blurry

[HerisonRK]

I edited some pictures I took a few months ago but I'm sure if they would be acceptable

1. I sent this one a while ago for screening but it got rejected for centre and dark. I fixed it but I'm not sure if it's still dark

2.

3.

4. (for 3 and 4 I'm not sure if it would get rejected due to compression)

5.

[dlowwa]

I took a picture of a registration that isn't in the database yet but I'm not sure whether contrast or exposure is acceptable.

1.

Your uncertainty is well founded; it would be rejected for dark/contrast.

[HerisonRK]

I took a picture of a registration that isn't in the database yet but I'm not sure whether contrast or exposure is acceptable.

1.

[dlowwa]

I took a ramp shot from inside the airport terminal. My concern is if it would get rejected for bad colour (or any other reason) and whether if it would be fixable.

1.

Slightly oversharpened, but otherwise ok for me.

[HerisonRK]

I took a ramp shot from inside the airport terminal. My concern is if it would get rejected for bad colour (or any other reason) and whether if it would be fixable.

1.

[dlowwa]

Can I have these 5 pictures pre-screened? I'm not sure if these would be acceptable. Thanks

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

1. blurry, horizon
2. borderline overexposed
3. soft/blurry, horizon, color
4. oversharpened
5. borderline heat haze

[HerisonRK]

Can I have these 5 pictures pre-screened? I'm not sure if these would be acceptable. Thanks

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.