Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreening Request- Herison RK

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by HerisonRK View Post
    Hi again,

    I have some pictures for prescreening. My main concern is whether poor contrast would be the issue in these.

    1.
    2.
    3.
    4.
    5.
    Your links are broken

    Leave a comment:


  • HerisonRK
    replied
    Hi again,

    I have some pictures for prescreening. My main concern is whether poor contrast would be the issue in these.

    1.
    2.
    3.
    4.
    5.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by HerisonRK View Post
    Thanks for pointing that out. I can see where you're coming from and I'll try to work on it.

    I also have some additional pictures for prescreening. The first two taken several years ago on a different camera and the other two I'm not sure about the contrast

    1. Click image for larger version Name:	A-001.jpg Views:	0 Size:	562.5 KB ID:	1099770
    2. Click image for larger version Name:	GRP.jpg Views:	0 Size:	465.1 KB ID:	1099771
    3. Click image for larger version Name:	A-1335.jpg Views:	0 Size:	976.4 KB ID:	1099772 4. Click image for larger version Name:	TS 1638.jpg Views:	0 Size:	867.9 KB ID:	1099773
    1. centering, color, soft, noise, contrast, compression
    2. soft, compression
    3. ok for me
    4. too far, soft, borderline dark/backlit

    Leave a comment:


  • HerisonRK
    replied
    Thanks for pointing that out. I can see where you're coming from and I'll try to work on it.

    I also have some additional pictures for prescreening. The first two taken several years ago on a different camera and the other two I'm not sure about the contrast

    1. Click image for larger version  Name:	A-001.jpg Views:	0 Size:	562.5 KB ID:	1099770
    2. Click image for larger version  Name:	GRP.jpg Views:	0 Size:	465.1 KB ID:	1099771
    3. Click image for larger version  Name:	A-1335.jpg Views:	0 Size:	976.4 KB ID:	1099772 4. Click image for larger version  Name:	TS 1638.jpg Views:	0 Size:	867.9 KB ID:	1099773

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by HerisonRK View Post
    I tried out night spotting for the first time and I'm wondering what people think of this image. I'm not sure about any editing tips when it comes to images taken at night

    1. Click image for larger version

Name:	WJG.jpg
Views:	142
Size:	595.2 KB
ID:	1099713
    A bit soft, clipped highlights, background is noisy

    Leave a comment:


  • HerisonRK
    replied
    I tried out night spotting for the first time and I'm wondering what people think of this image. I'm not sure about any editing tips when it comes to images taken at night

    1. Click image for larger version

Name:	WJG.jpg
Views:	142
Size:	595.2 KB
ID:	1099713

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by HerisonRK View Post
    Hi there,
    I'm just wondering on whats the screeners opinions on this cabin shot since I've never took cabin shots for JP before.
    1.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9061 copy.jpg
Views:	533
Size:	755.5 KB
ID:	1099199
    Image is soft/blurry.

    Leave a comment:


  • HerisonRK
    replied
    Hi there,
    I'm just wondering on whats the screeners opinions on this cabin shot since I've never took cabin shots for JP before.
    1.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9061 copy.jpg
Views:	533
Size:	755.5 KB
ID:	1099199

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by HerisonRK View Post
    I tried re-editing number 5 and just wondering if the adjustments would make it suitable

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6821 copy 2-Edit.jpg
Views:	527
Size:	440.7 KB
ID:	1099101
    Unfortunately not.

    Leave a comment:


  • HerisonRK
    replied
    I tried re-editing number 5 and just wondering if the adjustments would make it suitable

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6821 copy 2-Edit.jpg
Views:	527
Size:	440.7 KB
ID:	1099101

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by HerisonRK View Post
    Hello,

    I'm wondering if any of these 5 pictures are good enough for the database since I'm trying out different angles and panning shots

    1.
    Click image for larger version Name:	_MG_5439 copy-2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	509.4 KB ID:	1098962


    2.
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_8909 copy.jpg Views:	0 Size:	494.2 KB ID:	1098961

    3.
    Click image for larger version Name:	_MG_9772 copy.jpg Views:	0 Size:	567.4 KB ID:	1098963
    4.
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_8950 copy.jpg Views:	0 Size:	631.8 KB ID:	1098964 5. Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_6821 copy 2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	410.3 KB ID:	1098965
    1. blurry, oversharpened
    2. soft, centering, overprocessed
    3. soft (tail)
    4. ok for me
    5. contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • HerisonRK
    replied
    Hello,

    I'm wondering if any of these 5 pictures are good enough for the database since I'm trying out different angles and panning shots

    1.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	_MG_5439 copy-2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	509.4 KB ID:	1098962


    2.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_8909 copy.jpg Views:	0 Size:	494.2 KB ID:	1098961

    3.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	_MG_9772 copy.jpg Views:	0 Size:	567.4 KB ID:	1098963
    4.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_8950 copy.jpg Views:	0 Size:	631.8 KB ID:	1098964 5. Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_6821 copy 2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	410.3 KB ID:	1098965

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by HerisonRK View Post
    Hi,

    I got a photo rejected because it was dark/underexposed. I personally think that the exposure is fine.

    I attached a screenshot of the histogram of the rejected image (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8410034 )
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen Shot 2020-09-16 at 07.58.02.png
Views:	452
Size:	32.8 KB
ID:	1098739

    And a histogram of an accepted image (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9831107)
    Click image for larger version Name:	Screen Shot 2020-09-16 at 07.42.35.png Views:	0 Size:	28.0 KB ID:	1098738
    Both histogram screenshots were taken from adobe lightroom.

    I'm wondering if I should appeal it, adjust the exposure or if I should just move on to another image.
    It is indeed a bit dark, but not terribly so. Also slightly oversharpened.

    Leave a comment:


  • HerisonRK
    replied
    Hi,

    I got a photo rejected because it was dark/underexposed. I personally think that the exposure is fine.

    I attached a screenshot of the histogram of the rejected image (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8410034 )
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen Shot 2020-09-16 at 07.58.02.png
Views:	452
Size:	32.8 KB
ID:	1098739

    And a histogram of an accepted image (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9831107)
    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screen Shot 2020-09-16 at 07.42.35.png Views:	0 Size:	28.0 KB ID:	1098738
    Both histogram screenshots were taken from adobe lightroom.

    I'm wondering if I should appeal it, adjust the exposure or if I should just move on to another image.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by HerisonRK View Post
    Hi again, Can I get some additional prescreening/editing advice on these pictures?

    Sorry, I didn't know I was supposed to use the same thread

    1. Click image for larger version

Name:	_MG_7951 copy.jpg
Views:	612
Size:	915.5 KB
ID:	1097855

    2. Click image for larger version

Name:	_MG_7195 copy.jpg
Views:	563
Size:	411.2 KB
ID:	1097856

    3. Click image for larger version

Name:	_MG_7246 copy.jpg
Views:	572
Size:	441.5 KB
ID:	1097857

    4. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3740 copy-3.jpg
Views:	567
Size:	536.2 KB
ID:	1097859

    5. Click image for larger version

Name:	_MG_8531 copy.jpg
Views:	564
Size:	573.9 KB
ID:	1097858
    Hi,

    1. soft, too far
    2. centering, overprocessed (editing halos)
    3. too far, contrast
    4. soft, too far
    5. too far

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X