Prescreening Request- Herison RK

[HerisonRK]

I had this image rejected for "Bad Info: Aircraft" (Link:https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8671922). I used ATR 72-212A(600) from the autofill feature for this registration. I also checked other images in the database with the same reg and they use the same aircraft type as my image. I don't know if I should appeal or not

[dlowwa]

I had this image rejected for "Bad Info: Aircraft" (Link:https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8671922). I used ATR 72-212A(600) from the autofill feature for this registration. I also checked other images in the database with the same reg and they use the same aircraft type as my image. I don't know if I should appeal or not

System bug caused that field to appear blank. Put it back in the queue and let me know when you have done so and I will add it.

[HerisonRK]

System bug caused that field to appear blank. Put it back in the queue and let me know when you have done so and I will add it.

Done. Here’s the link: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8683472

[dlowwa]

Done. Here’s the link: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8683472

Thanks. Image has been added.

[HerisonRK]

Hi there, Can I get these two for prescreening? I'm not sure if contrast is acceptable for both.
1.
2.

[dlowwa]

Hi there, Can I get these two for prescreening? I'm not sure if contrast is acceptable for both.
1.
2.

First is soft/blurry towards the nose. Dust spots on both.

[HerisonRK]

Thanks for the advice. Can I also have this picture prescreened? This is my first picture in years that doesn't show the full aircraft so I'm not sure if it's acceptable.

1.

[dlowwa]

Thanks for the advice. Can I also have this picture prescreened? This is my first picture in years that doesn't show the full aircraft so I'm not sure if it's acceptable.

1.

Likely to be rejected for cut off.

[HerisonRK]

I'm not sure if there pictures of acceptable. Any advice on how to fix them?


1.


2.

3.

4.
5.

[dlowwa]

I'm not sure if there pictures of acceptable. Any advice on how to fix them?

Better sharpening on #3. Don't think the others can be 'fixed'.

[HerisonRK]

Hello all,

I got a photo rejected due to dust spots: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8760003. But when I checked with the dust tool I couldn't find the spots that needed to be edited.

Side note: Happy Late New Years everyone I reached 100 photos on JP during the holidays. I can't say Thank you enough to all the screeners who took the time and helped with the advice through this thread as it helped me get more and more pictures accepted to the database.

[dlowwa]

Hello all,

I got a photo rejected due to dust spots: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8760003. But when I checked with the dust tool I couldn't find the spots that needed to be edited.

Side note: Happy Late New Years everyone I reached 100 photos on JP during the holidays. I can't say Thank you enough to all the screeners who took the time and helped with the advice through this thread as it helped me get more and more pictures accepted to the database.

That seems to have been a mistake. I've accepted the image now. Happy New Year to you too

[HerisonRK]

Hi all,

I got a picture rejected for contrast (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8772558) but I'm not sure whether the issue is the lack of bright/dark tones or bad shooting conditions.

And I'm not sure about this picture as well whether contrast is acceptable.
1.

[dlowwa]

Hi all,

I got a picture rejected for contrast (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8772558) but I'm not sure whether the issue is the lack of bright/dark tones or bad shooting conditions.

And I'm not sure about this picture as well whether contrast is acceptable.
1.

I'd consider both borderline for contrast; for both the contrast is a bit weak, which is not helped by the hazy background.