Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Steve Rinde - Advice & Pre-screening

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • rindejr
    replied
    Pre-screening advice with potential issues listed:

    1) Soft? Or blurry beyond help?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	N86KZ.jpg
Views:	121
Size:	495.5 KB
ID:	1095964

    2) Centering (I centered vertically on the top and bottom fuselage, should it be on the starboard wing?)
    Also, not sure if you can answer this but I'm assuming this is FR24 compatible? Are you able to weigh in on that?

    Any other issues you see?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	n289up.jpg
Views:	118
Size:	890.4 KB
ID:	1095965

    Thanks for your time!
    Steve

    Leave a comment:


  • rindejr
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. covers are ok
    2. cargo loading may be ok, as long as not blocking too much, and also better if not blocking gear. Image also quite soft.
    Got it. Thanks again!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rindejr View Post
    Pre-screening advice and a clarification:

    1) will this covering be considered "obstruction"? I've previously had a very similar shot accepted and just wondering if that was a fluke.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	N6296V.jpg
Views:	162
Size:	663.8 KB
ID:	1095543

    2) Reading through the "Obstruction/clutter" rejection reason in Upload Guidelines, it made me think of a former picture I had rejected and rejected on appeal.
    "Exceptions may be made if the equipment forms part of the motive of the shot, such as in use de-icing equipment, or if the angle of the shot means only a small part of the aircraft is obstructed, such as ground power units/cargo loading devices."

    Similar to the de-icing equipment being a motive to show the de-icing process, my motive on this was to show the loading process with the loading devices. Then I also see cargo loading devices can obstruct a small part of the aircraft. Thoughts? Would it ever be worth uploading a shot showing the loading process on a cargo plane?

    If I recall correctly, this was only rejected for "obstruction."

    Click image for larger version

Name:	N181FE.jpg
Views:	130
Size:	542.7 KB
ID:	1095544
    1. covers are ok
    2. cargo loading may be ok, as long as not blocking too much, and also better if not blocking gear. Image also quite soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • rindejr
    replied
    Pre-screening advice and a clarification:

    1) will this covering be considered "obstruction"? I've previously had a very similar shot accepted and just wondering if that was a fluke.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	N6296V.jpg
Views:	162
Size:	663.8 KB
ID:	1095543

    2) Reading through the "Obstruction/clutter" rejection reason in Upload Guidelines, it made me think of a former picture I had rejected and rejected on appeal.
    "Exceptions may be made if the equipment forms part of the motive of the shot, such as in use de-icing equipment, or if the angle of the shot means only a small part of the aircraft is obstructed, such as ground power units/cargo loading devices."

    Similar to the de-icing equipment being a motive to show the de-icing process, my motive on this was to show the loading process with the loading devices. Then I also see cargo loading devices can obstruct a small part of the aircraft. Thoughts? Would it ever be worth uploading a shot showing the loading process on a cargo plane?

    If I recall correctly, this was only rejected for "obstruction."

    Click image for larger version

Name:	N181FE.jpg
Views:	130
Size:	542.7 KB
ID:	1095544

    Leave a comment:


  • rindejr
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. borderline soft, but ok for me
    2. also ok for me, but others might have issue with the contrast. It's more the military grey than the clouds causing an issue.
    3. ok for me
    Thanks for your help. I'll sharpen up #1 a bit.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rindejr View Post

    My apologies.
    Pre-screening advice - I've listed areas of potential concern and would appreciate thoughts or other concerns.
    1. borderline soft, but ok for me
    2. also ok for me, but others might have issue with the contrast. It's more the military grey than the clouds causing an issue.
    3. ok for me

    Leave a comment:


  • rindejr
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Hi,

    When you get a chance, please read here carefully, especially #2:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

    Thanks.
    My apologies.
    Pre-screening advice - I've listed areas of potential concern and would appreciate thoughts or other concerns.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	N137BA.jpg
Views:	147
Size:	291.6 KB
ID:	1095503
    1) soft, contrast, exposure

    Click image for larger version

Name:	84-0060-2.jpg
Views:	132
Size:	499.7 KB
ID:	1095504
    2) contrast, exposure, color? I like the clouds, but wonder if it messes up the contrast with a grey plane - I do have a shot without so many clouds.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	99-0404.jpg
Views:	132
Size:	796.2 KB
ID:	1095505
    3) centering (I've centered wingtip to wingtip and top/bottom fuselage), haze (for sure on the background plane, but not sure if that matters)


    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rindejr View Post
    Pre-screening advice - I've listed areas of potential concern and would appreciate thoughts or other concerns. Thanks!

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    1) soft, contrast, exposure?

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    2) contrast, exposure, color? I like the clouds, but wonder if it messes up the contrast with a grey plane - I do have a shot without so many clouds.

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    3) centering (I've centered wingtip to wingtip and top/bottom fuselage), haze (for sure on the background plane, but not sure if that matters)
    Hi,

    When you get a chance, please read here carefully, especially #2:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • rindejr
    replied
    Pre-screening advice - I've listed areas of potential concern and would appreciate thoughts or other concerns. Thanks!

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    1) soft, contrast, exposure?

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    2) contrast, exposure, color? I like the clouds, but wonder if it messes up the contrast with a grey plane - I do have a shot without so many clouds.

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    3) centering (I've centered wingtip to wingtip and top/bottom fuselage), haze (for sure on the background plane, but not sure if that matters)

    Leave a comment:


  • rindejr
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    If the tail is completely in shadow, it will usually be considered backlit.
    Got it. Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rindejr View Post
    Rejected for "backlit" and "bad info" - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8326245

    For future reference on backlit, is this very close to being not backlit? Where specifically should I focus to see if it will be rejected as backlit?

    Thanks for your time!
    If the tail is completely in shadow, it will usually be considered backlit.

    Leave a comment:


  • rindejr
    replied
    Rejected for "backlit" and "bad info" - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8326245

    For future reference on backlit, is this very close to being not backlit? Where specifically should I focus to see if it will be rejected as backlit?

    Thanks for your time!

    Leave a comment:


  • rindejr
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post

    No. The main subject needs to be an airport infrastructure, like for example a ramp, runway, tower.
    Sounds good! Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by rindejr View Post

    Shaking my head at myself for "military"...

    In this picture there is part of a hangar on the right, and a runway approach light for RWY 31 to the left of the sign. Still not acceptable?




    No. The main subject needs to be an airport infrastructure, like for example a ramp, runway, tower.

    Leave a comment:


  • rindejr
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    No, was uploaded as 'military'.



    It is not. Airport signs won't be accepted unless something else is visible (aircraft, runway, terminal, etc.)
    Shaking my head at myself for "military"...

    In this picture there is part of a hangar on the right, and a runway approach light for RWY 31 to the left of the sign. Still not acceptable?





    Leave a comment:

Working...
X