Steve Rinde - Advice & Pre-screening

[rindejr]

Rejection advice needed. Dark and contrast rejection. I’ve had many overcast shots with non-sky backgrounds accepted, and I know how to fix the under exposure. But what would you advice with the contrast? Thanks!

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8859500

[dlowwa]

Rejection advice needed. Dark and contrast rejection. I’ve had many overcast shots with non-sky backgrounds accepted, and I know how to fix the under exposure. But what would you advice with the contrast? Thanks!

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8859500

Image was taken in very poor light. I don't think this can be fixed with editing.

[rindejr]

Rejection question: This photo was rejected for contrast issues ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9253185 ) however, I am stumped on if it should be more or less contrasted, because to me, by the histograms, it seems properly contrasted. The conditions were overcast. I would appeal it but don't want to use that too much.

I have had more contrast rejections lately, albeit in sub-prime lighting conditions, than typical. However, I did just have one overturned (my most recent upload, an AF 787) through appeal.

Any editing tips or advice welcomed! -Steve

[PabloGlez]

Rejection question: This photo was rejected for contrast issues ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9253185 ) however, I am stumped on if it should be more or less contrasted, because to me, by the histograms, it seems properly contrasted. The conditions were overcast. I would appeal it but don't want to use that too much.

I have had more contrast rejections lately, albeit in sub-prime lighting conditions, than typical. However, I did just have one overturned (my most recent upload, an AF 787) through appeal.

Any editing tips or advice welcomed! -Steve

I ´m not screener, but as I see, it is lack of contrast. What you see in the histogram is the white tones of the clouds on the background.. the fuselage is grey. Keep in mind that most of the photos rejected as Too much or too little contrast are too little contrasted, and more if the photo was taken in poor light conditions. If you edit this photo properly the sky will get overexposed.

[rindejr]

I ´m not screener, but as I see, it is lack of contrast. What you see in the histogram is the white tones of the clouds on the background.. the fuselage is grey. Keep in mind that most of the photos rejected as Too much or too little contrast are too little contrasted, and more if the photo was taken in poor light conditions. If you edit this photo properly the sky will get overexposed.

That makes sense. Thanks for the insight, Pablo!

[dlowwa]

Rejection question: This photo was rejected for contrast issues ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9253185 ) however, I am stumped on if it should be more or less contrasted, because to me, by the histograms, it seems properly contrasted. The conditions were overcast. I would appeal it but don't want to use that too much.

I have had more contrast rejections lately, albeit in sub-prime lighting conditions, than typical. However, I did just have one overturned (my most recent upload, an AF 787) through appeal.

Any editing tips or advice welcomed! -Steve

Poor contrast due to overcast conditions. Aircraft is also somewhat blurry. As such, not fixable, sorry.

[rindejr]

Advice needed - potential issue listed:

1) Contrast (this was a post-sunset blue hour shot with the blue being "intensified" with wildfire smoke in the air)

Any other areas of concern? Thanks in advance for your time and advice.

[dlowwa]

Advice needed - potential issue listed:

1) Contrast (this was a post-sunset blue hour shot with the blue being "intensified" with wildfire smoke in the air)

Any other areas of concern? Thanks in advance for your time and advice.

Aircraft is blurry. Would have been a dark/contrast rejection in any case.

[rindejr]

Aircraft is blurry. Would have been a dark/contrast rejection in any case.

Thanks, Dana. I suspected that dark/contrast issue.

Curious where you are seeing blurry? Soft could always be a potential, but I’m not seeing it blurry on this or the RAW file. Thanks again.

[dlowwa]

Thanks, Dana. I suspected that dark/contrast issue.

Curious where you are seeing blurry? Soft could always be a potential, but I’m not seeing it blurry on this or the RAW file. Thanks again.

Tail & left side. Do you have a 100% crop? If that's not blurry, then all it might need is to have the sharpening re-worked.