Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Steve Rinde - Advice & Pre-screening

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Rejection advice needed. Dark and contrast rejection. I’ve had many overcast shots with non-sky backgrounds accepted, and I know how to fix the under exposure. But what would you advice with the contrast? Thanks!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8859500

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by rindejr View Post
      Rejection advice needed. Dark and contrast rejection. I’ve had many overcast shots with non-sky backgrounds accepted, and I know how to fix the under exposure. But what would you advice with the contrast? Thanks!

      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8859500
      Image was taken in very poor light. I don't think this can be fixed with editing.

      Comment


      • #78
        Rejection question: This photo was rejected for contrast issues ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9253185 ) however, I am stumped on if it should be more or less contrasted, because to me, by the histograms, it seems properly contrasted. The conditions were overcast. I would appeal it but don't want to use that too much.

        I have had more contrast rejections lately, albeit in sub-prime lighting conditions, than typical. However, I did just have one overturned (my most recent upload, an AF 787) through appeal.

        Any editing tips or advice welcomed! -Steve

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by rindejr View Post
          Rejection question: This photo was rejected for contrast issues ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9253185 ) however, I am stumped on if it should be more or less contrasted, because to me, by the histograms, it seems properly contrasted. The conditions were overcast. I would appeal it but don't want to use that too much.

          I have had more contrast rejections lately, albeit in sub-prime lighting conditions, than typical. However, I did just have one overturned (my most recent upload, an AF 787) through appeal.

          Any editing tips or advice welcomed! -Steve
          I īm not screener, but as I see, it is lack of contrast. What you see in the histogram is the white tones of the clouds on the background.. the fuselage is grey. Keep in mind that most of the photos rejected as Too much or too little contrast are too little contrasted, and more if the photo was taken in poor light conditions. If you edit this photo properly the sky will get overexposed.

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post

            I īm not screener, but as I see, it is lack of contrast. What you see in the histogram is the white tones of the clouds on the background.. the fuselage is grey. Keep in mind that most of the photos rejected as Too much or too little contrast are too little contrasted, and more if the photo was taken in poor light conditions. If you edit this photo properly the sky will get overexposed.
            That makes sense. Thanks for the insight, Pablo!

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by rindejr View Post
              Rejection question: This photo was rejected for contrast issues ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9253185 ) however, I am stumped on if it should be more or less contrasted, because to me, by the histograms, it seems properly contrasted. The conditions were overcast. I would appeal it but don't want to use that too much.

              I have had more contrast rejections lately, albeit in sub-prime lighting conditions, than typical. However, I did just have one overturned (my most recent upload, an AF 787) through appeal.

              Any editing tips or advice welcomed! -Steve
              Poor contrast due to overcast conditions. Aircraft is also somewhat blurry. As such, not fixable, sorry.

              Comment


              • #82
                Advice needed - potential issue listed:

                1) Contrast (this was a post-sunset blue hour shot with the blue being "intensified" with wildfire smoke in the air)

                Any other areas of concern? Thanks in advance for your time and advice.
                Click image for larger version

Name:	n501dn.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	655.4 KB
ID:	1120308

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by rindejr View Post
                  Advice needed - potential issue listed:

                  1) Contrast (this was a post-sunset blue hour shot with the blue being "intensified" with wildfire smoke in the air)

                  Any other areas of concern? Thanks in advance for your time and advice.
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	n501dn.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	655.4 KB
ID:	1120308
                  Aircraft is blurry. Would have been a dark/contrast rejection in any case.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                    Aircraft is blurry. Would have been a dark/contrast rejection in any case.
                    Thanks, Dana. I suspected that dark/contrast issue.

                    Curious where you are seeing blurry? Soft could always be a potential, but I’m not seeing it blurry on this or the RAW file. Thanks again.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by rindejr View Post

                      Thanks, Dana. I suspected that dark/contrast issue.

                      Curious where you are seeing blurry? Soft could always be a potential, but I’m not seeing it blurry on this or the RAW file. Thanks again.
                      Tail & left side. Do you have a 100% crop? If that's not blurry, then all it might need is to have the sharpening re-worked.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X