Originally posted by rindejr
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Steve Rinde - Advice & Pre-screening
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Aircraft is blurry. Would have been a dark/contrast rejection in any case.
Curious where you are seeing blurry? Soft could always be a potential, but I’m not seeing it blurry on this or the RAW file. Thanks again.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rindejr View Post
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by rindejr View PostRejection question: This photo was rejected for contrast issues ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9253185 ) however, I am stumped on if it should be more or less contrasted, because to me, by the histograms, it seems properly contrasted. The conditions were overcast. I would appeal it but don't want to use that too much.
I have had more contrast rejections lately, albeit in sub-prime lighting conditions, than typical. However, I did just have one overturned (my most recent upload, an AF 787) through appeal.
Any editing tips or advice welcomed! -Steve
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post
I īm not screener, but as I see, it is lack of contrast. What you see in the histogram is the white tones of the clouds on the background.. the fuselage is grey. Keep in mind that most of the photos rejected as Too much or too little contrast are too little contrasted, and more if the photo was taken in poor light conditions. If you edit this photo properly the sky will get overexposed.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rindejr View PostRejection question: This photo was rejected for contrast issues ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9253185 ) however, I am stumped on if it should be more or less contrasted, because to me, by the histograms, it seems properly contrasted. The conditions were overcast. I would appeal it but don't want to use that too much.
I have had more contrast rejections lately, albeit in sub-prime lighting conditions, than typical. However, I did just have one overturned (my most recent upload, an AF 787) through appeal.
Any editing tips or advice welcomed! -Steve
Leave a comment:
-
Rejection question: This photo was rejected for contrast issues ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9253185 ) however, I am stumped on if it should be more or less contrasted, because to me, by the histograms, it seems properly contrasted. The conditions were overcast. I would appeal it but don't want to use that too much.
I have had more contrast rejections lately, albeit in sub-prime lighting conditions, than typical. However, I did just have one overturned (my most recent upload, an AF 787) through appeal.
Any editing tips or advice welcomed! -Steve
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rindejr View PostRejection advice needed. Dark and contrast rejection. I’ve had many overcast shots with non-sky backgrounds accepted, and I know how to fix the under exposure. But what would you advice with the contrast? Thanks!
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8859500
Leave a comment:
-
Rejection advice needed. Dark and contrast rejection. I’ve had many overcast shots with non-sky backgrounds accepted, and I know how to fix the under exposure. But what would you advice with the contrast? Thanks!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rindejr View Post
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
The 3:2 is close enough to acceptable, for me anyways. Not widely known fact: you can submit an image at any ratio between 4:3 and 16:9. It doesn't have to be exact. 1920x1120 would be totally fine, for example.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rindejr View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
1. yes, borderline dark. would be ok for me, but I could easily see someone else rejecting it for underexposed
2. also a bit dark, and yes, definitely too low in the frame.
3. visible side & tail completely in shadow, backlit rejection was justified. and yes, accepted one probably should have been rejected as well
Would one of these two be more acceptable than the other for framing? Unfortunately, I can't bring the aircraft up any higher in the 3:2.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: