Lucas Sérgio - Editing Advance

[dlowwa]

Hello, me again. All right? Hope so. I'm not sure if these photos are acceptable. Could you please help me? Thank you in advance.

1-2. soft, dark/contrast
3. overprocessed, dark/contrast
4. dark/contrast

[lucasspotter]

Hello, me again. All right? Hope so. I'm not sure if these photos are acceptable. Could you please help me? Thank you in advance.

[LX-A343]

Hey, how are you? Hope so good. Can you help me again, please? That images are good to JetPhotos? Thanks in advance...

only one photo is visible, VP-CXU. This one is overexposed, soft, has a colour cast.

[lucasspotter]

Hey, how are you? Hope so good. Can you help me again, please? That images are good to JetPhotos? Thanks in advance...

[olandes269]

Hello, how are you? Hope so good. Me again... Could you please analyze these photos and tell me if they are good and acceptable? Thanks in advance...

1-


2-


3-

Hello lucas, i'm not screener but i help you.

1 vignetting

2 green color, as if it were taken from inside an airport, a small white balance would probably be necessary

3 Dark

[lucasspotter]

Hello, how are you? Hope so good. Me again... Could you please analyze these photos and tell me if they are good and acceptable? Thanks in advance...

1-


2-


3-

[dlowwa]

Hello, how are you? Hope so good. Me again... I am about to send this pic to the queue and I would like to know your opinion regarding the quality and post processing, for kindness!

Looks a bit blurry towards the edges, and the contrast is not very good due to the poor light.

[lucasspotter]

Hello, how are you? Hope so good. Me again... I am about to send this pic to the queue and I would like to know your opinion regarding the quality and post processing, for kindness!

[dlowwa]

Hello, how are you? Hope so good. Me again... I am about to send this pic to the queue and I would like to know your opinion regarding the quality, for kindness! Was taked with a old cam.

-Thank u so much in advance!

There are issues with compression, heat haze, and softness. I don't think it would accepted as-is.

[dlowwa]

Hello. Could you help me again? I had a photo of the cabin rejected because there were people with recognizable faces. I would like to know if there are reasons for the images below to be rejected and what are your guidelines regarding images of the cabin in which people in front appear. Thanks in advance...


1-



2-



3-

Without the masks, none of these would be acceptable. With the masks on, it will be up to the individual screener to assess how identifiable the people are. In my opinion, the first two would be ok in that regard, but others may disagree with me.

[dlowwa]

Hello! Me again. Could you please help me? I had this photo rejected because it was blurry and undersharpened. I reduced the size of the image and applied masks of sharpness. Is it good or is there probably no way to fix it? Tks in advance!

Still a bit soft, but may be able to sneak it by.

[dlowwa]

Hello! I would like to know your opinions about these images, if they are good for JetPhotos.net... I never got the point of post processing of flight deck images right, so I came to ask for your help. Thanks in advance!

1-



2-

First one will likely have issues due to contrast, noise, softness, etc. Not sure that it is fixable. Second is better and may be acceptable as-is.

[lucasspotter]

Hello! I would like to know your opinions about these images, if they are good for JetPhotos.net... I never got the point of post processing of flight deck images right, so I came to ask for your help. Thanks in advance!

1-



2-