Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

planespotter.lars Editing/Pre-screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by planespotter.lars View Post

    Just by any chance, do you know how this vignetting could be caused without even processing the picture?
    Google: Lens vignetting.

    Originally posted by planespotter.lars View Post
    And another little question, today I resubmitted a picture with an higher resolution, is there any way of checking the status of the resubmission? Will I get an E-Mail? If yes Ill have to get in contact with your team as I haven't been getting Mails for ages now which I don't care about when it comes to screening but is quite tricky with appeals.
    Not sure that we accept re-uploads simply for better resolution.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

      Google: Lens vignetting.



      Not sure that we accept re-uploads simply for better resolution.
      Oh did not know that, thanks for clarifying. Just thought it'd be a good idea to upload nice shots from the time I had the 1280px limit with 1600 or 1920px now.
      Furthermore I yesterday evening submitted an appeal but as only god knows why, I did not receive any Mail regarding the status. Would be cool if you coul check it for me. Photo ID is 9138879.
      Best regards,
      Lars

      Comment


      • Originally posted by planespotter.lars View Post

        Oh did not know that, thanks for clarifying. Just thought it'd be a good idea to upload nice shots from the time I had the 1280px limit with 1600 or 1920px now.
        Furthermore I yesterday evening submitted an appeal but as only god knows why, I did not receive any Mail regarding the status. Would be cool if you coul check it for me. Photo ID is 9138879.
        Best regards,
        Lars
        Image was not submitted within the allowable size range of 4:3 to 16:9.

        Also please read here very carefully, especially #8:

        https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

        "this picture was prescreened by Dana and she (he) said it was absolutely alright" is not an acceptable appeal reason, and if repeated will lead to me no longer commenting on your images.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

          Image was not submitted within the allowable size range of 4:3 to 16:9.
          God damn it I thought 16:10 was still allowed so my bad, sorry for the stupid appeal.

          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
          Also please read here very carefully, especially #8:

          https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

          "this picture was prescreened by Dana and she (he) said it was absolutely alright" is not an acceptable appeal reason, and if repeated will lead to me no longer commenting on your images.
          I am sincerely sorry that I didn't take that into account, must have been too long since I last read that thread. I ensure you that this will not happen again as I really don't want to lose this nice opportunity of getting pictures prescreened at all.
          Best regards and my apologies for the mistake,
          Lars

          Comment


          • Click image for larger version

Name:	8199FE08-9A24-4FCF-96D6-5F354D2A8FA1.jpeg
Views:	111
Size:	887.6 KB
ID:	1116435 Good morning Dana,
            This shot should be okay but as I have never uploaded a Beluga XL before I‘d like to know if the crop etc. is fine.
            Best regards,
            Lars

            Comment


            • Good evening,
              Would like to hear your opinion about this one, too.
              Thanks in advance and best regards,
              Lars
              Click image for larger version

Name:	JP 1 (1 von 1)-260.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	505.8 KB
ID:	1116557

              Comment


              • Originally posted by planespotter.lars View Post
                Good evening,
                Would like to hear your opinion about this one, too.
                Borderline soft/overexposed, but ok for me.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                  Borderline soft/overexposed, but ok for me.
                  Thanks, Dana. What about the Beluga two posts above?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by planespotter.lars View Post

                    Thanks, Dana. What about the Beluga two posts above?
                    Borderline for overexposed/horizon.

                    Comment


                    • Click image for larger version

Name:	JP 1 (1 von 1)-285.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	902.4 KB
ID:	1116806
                      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                      Borderline for overexposed/horizon.
                      Thanks. Tried to fix it, would be great if you could have a look.
                      Attached Files

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by planespotter.lars View Post
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	JP 1 (1 von 1)-285.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	902.4 KB
ID:	1116806

                        Thanks. Tried to fix it, would be great if you could have a look.
                        Would be acceptable for me.

                        Comment


                        • Good day,
                          Finally got to spot again but as I haven't edited any picture in the last four months it would be great to have them checked.
                          Thanks in advance,
                          Lars
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	JP 1 (1 von 1)-298.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	755.9 KB
ID:	1120865Click image for larger version

Name:	JP 1 (1 von 1)-299.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	799.4 KB
ID:	1120866

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by planespotter.lars View Post
                            Good day,
                            Finally got to spot again but as I haven't edited any picture in the last four months it would be great to have them checked.
                            1. soft
                            2. ok for me

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                              1. soft
                              2. ok for me
                              Thank you very much.

                              Would you say that there are any remaining major dust spots in this picture of if there are any other faults?
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	JP 1 (1 von 1)-321.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	592.1 KB
ID:	1121767 Best regards

                              Comment


                              • Click image for larger version

Name:	JP 1 (1 von 1)-346.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	563.4 KB
ID:	1121853 Hey,
                                Would like to hear your opinion on these two, too. Are they too soft?
                                Click image for larger version  Name:	JP 1 (1 von 1)-338.jpg Views:	0 Size:	863.4 KB ID:	1121839

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X