Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
    Firstly, thank you for pre-screening
    And what about these photos? Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-PSI.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	875.3 KB
ID:	1101358Click image for larger version

Name:	D-CGBR.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	1.27 MB
ID:	1101359Click image for larger version

Name:	TC-LLK.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	1.19 MB
ID:	1101360Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-AZC.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	1.32 MB
ID:	1101361Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-PSM.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	1.60 MB
ID:	1101362
    They lack the quality to be submitted at 1920pix. You will probably want to try a lower resolution, like 1280.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boryspil Spotter
    replied
    Firstly, thank you for pre-screening
    And what about these photos? Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-PSI.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	875.3 KB
ID:	1101358Click image for larger version

Name:	D-CGBR.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	1.27 MB
ID:	1101359Click image for larger version

Name:	TC-LLK.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	1.19 MB
ID:	1101360Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-AZC.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	1.32 MB
ID:	1101361Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-PSM.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	1.60 MB
ID:	1101362

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
    Thank you for the last pre-screening advice. What do you think about these photos? Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-RWD.jpg
Views:	64
Size:	538.5 KB
ID:	1101073Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-PSG.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	494.3 KB
ID:	1101074Click image for larger version

Name:	TC-LLH.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	632.9 KB
ID:	1101075Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-WRH.jpg
Views:	60
Size:	481.1 KB
ID:	1101076Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-DNT.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	539.0 KB
ID:	1101077
    Slight bit of blur on 2 & 5, but otherwise quality looks ok to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boryspil Spotter
    replied
    Thank you for the last pre-screening advice. What do you think about these photos? Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-RWD.jpg
Views:	64
Size:	538.5 KB
ID:	1101073Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-PSG.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	494.3 KB
ID:	1101074Click image for larger version

Name:	TC-LLH.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	632.9 KB
ID:	1101075Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-WRH.jpg
Views:	60
Size:	481.1 KB
ID:	1101076Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-DNT.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	539.0 KB
ID:	1101077

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
    Thanks for advice. What about these? Click image for larger version

Name:	9h-qcq.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	423.1 KB
ID:	1100646Click image for larger version

Name:	vp-bcr.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	426.8 KB
ID:	1100647Click image for larger version

Name:	ur-utq.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	415.4 KB
ID:	1100648Click image for larger version

Name:	a6-fdz.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	466.0 KB
ID:	1100649Click image for larger version

Name:	sp-rkc.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	481.1 KB
ID:	1100650
    Would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boryspil Spotter
    replied
    Thanks for advice. What about these? Click image for larger version

Name:	9h-qcq.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	423.1 KB
ID:	1100646Click image for larger version

Name:	vp-bcr.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	426.8 KB
ID:	1100647Click image for larger version

Name:	ur-utq.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	415.4 KB
ID:	1100648Click image for larger version

Name:	a6-fdz.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	466.0 KB
ID:	1100649Click image for larger version

Name:	sp-rkc.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	481.1 KB
ID:	1100650

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
    Thank you for advice. What do you think about these? Click image for larger version

Name:	emg.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	642.0 KB
ID:	1100115Click image for larger version

Name:	awb.jpg
Views:	81
Size:	400.6 KB
ID:	1100114Click image for larger version

Name:	psw.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	646.8 KB
ID:	1100116Click image for larger version

Name:	psx.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	625.1 KB
ID:	1100117
    Would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boryspil Spotter
    replied
    Thank you for advice. What do you think about these? Click image for larger version

Name:	emg.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	642.0 KB
ID:	1100115Click image for larger version

Name:	awb.jpg
Views:	81
Size:	400.6 KB
ID:	1100114Click image for larger version

Name:	psw.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	646.8 KB
ID:	1100116Click image for larger version

Name:	psx.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	625.1 KB
ID:	1100117

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
    Thanks! What about these? Click image for larger version

Name:	lauda.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	405.8 KB
ID:	1100043Click image for larger version

Name:	uia738.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	358.8 KB
ID:	1100044Click image for larger version

Name:	fdb.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	392.3 KB
ID:	1100045Click image for larger version

Name:	windrose.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	375.1 KB
ID:	1100046Click image for larger version

Name:	uiaemb.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	362.4 KB
ID:	1100047
    1+3 contrast. not fixable.
    2+5 dark
    4 soft

    Leave a comment:


  • Boryspil Spotter
    replied
    Thanks! What about these? Click image for larger version

Name:	lauda.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	405.8 KB
ID:	1100043Click image for larger version

Name:	uia738.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	358.8 KB
ID:	1100044Click image for larger version

Name:	fdb.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	392.3 KB
ID:	1100045Click image for larger version

Name:	windrose.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	375.1 KB
ID:	1100046Click image for larger version

Name:	uiaemb.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	362.4 KB
ID:	1100047

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
    Thanks for the last answer. What do you think of these photos? Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838799928.jpg
Views:	146
Size:	397.1 KB
ID:	1099920Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838799312.jpg
Views:	143
Size:	410.3 KB
ID:	1099921Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838798902.jpg
Views:	132
Size:	419.7 KB
ID:	1099922Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838801161.jpg
Views:	144
Size:	456.6 KB
ID:	1099923Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838801506.jpg
Views:	146
Size:	715.5 KB
ID:	1099924
    There are issues with softness, compression, and editing halos on most of them, and #2 also has poor contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boryspil Spotter
    replied
    Thanks for the last answer. What do you think of these photos? Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838799928.jpg
Views:	146
Size:	397.1 KB
ID:	1099920Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838799312.jpg
Views:	143
Size:	410.3 KB
ID:	1099921Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838798902.jpg
Views:	132
Size:	419.7 KB
ID:	1099922Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838801161.jpg
Views:	144
Size:	456.6 KB
ID:	1099923Click image for larger version

Name:	1601838801506.jpg
Views:	146
Size:	715.5 KB
ID:	1099924

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
    Thanks for answering, what about this? Click image for larger version

Name:	1601318517796 (1).jpg
Views:	150
Size:	434.4 KB
ID:	1099563Click image for larger version

Name:	1601317992659 (1).jpg
Views:	150
Size:	558.1 KB
ID:	1099564Click image for larger version

Name:	1601317991253 (1).jpg
Views:	152
Size:	540.8 KB
ID:	1099565
    Slightly oversharpened, but otherwise ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boryspil Spotter
    replied
    Thanks for answering, what about this? Click image for larger version

Name:	1601318517796 (1).jpg
Views:	150
Size:	434.4 KB
ID:	1099563Click image for larger version

Name:	1601317992659 (1).jpg
Views:	150
Size:	558.1 KB
ID:	1099564Click image for larger version

Name:	1601317991253 (1).jpg
Views:	152
Size:	540.8 KB
ID:	1099565

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
    What do you think of these photos?
    will Hainan be cut-off? ​​​​​​ Click image for larger version

Name:	1601204145300 (1).jpg
Views:	165
Size:	489.4 KB
ID:	1099449Click image for larger version

Name:	1601204144967.jpg
Views:	185
Size:	512.7 KB
ID:	1099450Click image for larger version

Name:	1601204144376.jpg
Views:	163
Size:	434.2 KB
ID:	1099451Click image for larger version

Name:	1601204145619.jpg
Views:	164
Size:	557.4 KB
ID:	1099452Click image for larger version

Name:	1601204144646.jpg
Views:	162
Size:	448.6 KB
ID:	1099453
    Don't see any major issues.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X