Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post

    tell me pls what I need to do these except second photo acceptable
    See here:

    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    #4 is fixable with better centering and a sharper image (lower resolution would help). The other images have issues (mostly contrast) that do not seem to be fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boryspil Spotter
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1, 3, and 5 have poor contrast
    2. is heat hazed
    tell me pls what I need to do these except second photo acceptable

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post

    poor contrast is a lot of contrast or a little contrast?
    Little contrast, because of the bad light conditions, #1 looks fixable, the other ones no for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boryspil Spotter
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1, 3, and 5 have poor contrast
    2. is heat hazed
    poor contrast is a lot of contrast or a little contrast?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post

    Why? I have seen a lot of pictures like these on Jet photos
    1, 3, and 5 have poor contrast
    2. is heat hazed

    Leave a comment:


  • Boryspil Spotter
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    #4 is fixable with better centering and a sharper image (lower resolution would help). The other images have issues (mostly contrast) thay do not seem to be fixable.
    Why? I have seen a lot of pictures like these on Jet photos

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post

    please tell me what needs to be fixed to be accepted
    #4 is fixable with better centering and a sharper image (lower resolution would help). The other images have issues (mostly contrast) thay do not seem to be fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boryspil Spotter
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    None of them would be accepted. #2 is not cut off.
    please tell me what needs to be fixed to be accepted

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
    Will these photos be accepted? and what about crop in the second photo, cut off?
    None of them would be accepted. #2 is not cut off.

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
    Will these photos be accepted? and what about crop in the second photo, cut off? Click image for larger version

Name:	YL-AAQ1.jpg
Views:	172
Size:	773.6 KB
ID:	1108820Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-ATD.jpg
Views:	167
Size:	797.1 KB
ID:	1108821Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AINY.jpg
Views:	174
Size:	1.16 MB
ID:	1108822Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-LBV.jpg
Views:	162
Size:	830.3 KB
ID:	1108823Click image for larger version

Name:	9H-LMJ.jpg
Views:	164
Size:	1,020.9 KB
ID:	1108824
    I´m not screener, but in my opinion..

    1. Ok for me
    2. Soft and horizon unlevel (The crop is ok)
    3. Contrast
    4. Borderline soft, and I think that is not the best image format, I´d use 16:10 instead of 4:3
    5. Contrast

    Regards!
    Pablo Gonzalez de Leon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boryspil Spotter
    replied
    Will these photos be accepted? and what about crop in the second photo, cut off? Click image for larger version

Name:	YL-AAQ1.jpg
Views:	172
Size:	773.6 KB
ID:	1108820Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-ATD.jpg
Views:	167
Size:	797.1 KB
ID:	1108821Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AINY.jpg
Views:	174
Size:	1.16 MB
ID:	1108822Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-LBV.jpg
Views:	162
Size:	830.3 KB
ID:	1108823Click image for larger version

Name:	9H-LMJ.jpg
Views:	164
Size:	1,020.9 KB
ID:	1108824

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
    Better and acceptable?[
    Unfortunately no.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boryspil Spotter
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. blurry, noisy, oversharpened
    2. dirty
    3. soft, noisy
    4. dirty, noisy
    Better and acceptable? Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-LIM.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	343.7 KB
ID:	1107315Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-WRH.jpg
Views:	90
Size:	410.8 KB
ID:	1107316Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-FES.jpg
Views:	99
Size:	545.1 KB
ID:	1107317Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-RWA.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	556.0 KB
ID:	1107318Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-AZK.jpg
Views:	97
Size:	897.4 KB
ID:	1107319

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Boryspil Spotter View Post
    Hi, thanks for the previous answer, what about these photos?
    1. blurry, noisy, oversharpened
    2. dirty
    3. soft, noisy
    4. dirty, noisy

    Leave a comment:


  • Boryspil Spotter
    replied
    Hi, thanks for the previous answer, what about these photos?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-FES.jpg
Views:	115
Size:	665.0 KB
ID:	1107151Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-WRH.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	678.5 KB
ID:	1107152Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-RWA.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	674.9 KB
ID:	1107153Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-AZK.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	992.6 KB
ID:	1107154

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X