Hi Dlowwa
Thank you for taking the time to come back to me, I appreciate the feedback on the above rejections and the time taken as I know you are all very busy.
I have decided for now to take a break from uploading because just lately I have been finding I am not enjoying the hobby as much and I think a part of that is because I have been getting a lot of rejections lately. I appreciate that you and the other screeners need to maintain a level of quality on this site and I think time away will be beneficial to me anyways.
I may start to upload again in the future.
I have learned a lot from both other contributors and the screeners here and my photography and editing skills have benefitted from this, so thank you for this.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Photo Rejections
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by SamR View Posthttps://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8435088 : Is this too much or too little contrast, always find this rejection reason a minefield, I would assume its too little, but just wanted to clarify. Personally I have always felt that there should be a separate rejection category for each (not so much for me but for new contributors)
Originally posted by SamR View Posthttps://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8438950 : assuming this one is a little high in the frame, but due to the angle if I leave more space at the top the aircraft looks low in the frame. Again happy to accept I am probably wrong with this one.
Originally posted by SamR View PostLastly the below two
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
In both cases these were rejected for under-exposed, however if I increase the exposer the top of the aircraft will be overexposed, is this an exposure issue with the mid tones or is it simply because the underside of the aircraft is dark.
Leave a comment:
-
Actually all reasons for rejects are accurate, but I completely do not agree with the rejection of Malaysia A350, try to appeal for that one
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SamR View PostHoping I can get some advice and clarification as to the reasons why all of a recent batch of uploaded photos have been rejected.
I have been contributing photos here for more than ten years and recently I have been having a lot of rejections and as far as I can tell I am not doing anything differently. Maybe its my Interpretation of the upload guidelines, but before I simply stop uploading anymore, like many of my friends and previous long term contributors have done I wanted to get some clarification.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8436441 : please can you tell me where the Cmos is in this photo as I have looked at it three times in photoshop and at least twice using the upload tools and I still can't see it. I accept its possible that I am simply just missing it.
Leave a comment:
-
Photo Rejections
Hoping I can get some advice and clarification as to the reasons why all of a recent batch of uploaded photos have been rejected.
I have been contributing photos here for more than ten years and recently I have been having a lot of rejections and as far as I can tell I am not doing anything differently. Maybe its my Interpretation of the upload guidelines, but before I simply stop uploading anymore, like many of my friends and previous long term contributors have done I wanted to get some clarification.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8436441 : please can you tell me where the Cmos is in this photo as I have looked at it three times in photoshop and at least twice using the upload tools and I still can't see it. I accept its possible that I am simply just missing it.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8435088 : Is this too much or too little contrast, always find this rejection reason a minefield, I would assume its too little, but just wanted to clarify. Personally I have always felt that there should be a separate rejection category for each (not so much for me but for new contributors),
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8438950 : assuming this one is a little high in the frame, but due to the angle if I leave more space at the top the aircraft looks low in the frame. Again happy to accept I am probably wrong with this one.
Lastly the below two
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
In both cases these were rejected for under-exposed, however if I increase the exposer the top of the aircraft will be overexposed, is this an exposure issue with the mid tones or is it simply because the underside of the aircraft is dark.
The other rejection I would have asked about, but now looking at it again on a full screen I now 100% agree with.
Please keep in mind the main reason I am asking is because I don't want to waste either my time or the screeners time.
Tags: None
Leave a comment: