Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Advice for LewisW295 Please

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    A bit soft/dark, but otherwise ok.



    Soft, obstructed.
    I'll brighten and increase sharpening then before waiting to que it.

    Obstructed due to the nose gear being behind the grass? I thought the limit was 50% and as I can see both MLG, that'd be okay. Other than that, I can't see an obstruction.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post

    That information is super useful. Thank you. I've now amended my workspace to use a locked ratio and to check each export. I think I've killed all the CA and fringing now.
    A bit soft/dark, but otherwise ok.

    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post
    Any thoughts as to this one? Taken in extremely low sun. Not sure if the motion blur on the grass would rule it out or the exhaust blur.
    Soft, obstructed.

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Apologies for the double post,

    Any thoughts as to this one? Taken in extremely low sun. Not sure if the motion blur on the grass would rule it out or the exhaust blur. Click image for larger version

Name:	PH-EZC 190LR (ERJ-190-100LR)-3.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	542.8 KB
ID:	1101392

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Quality should be ok, but anything less than a 16:9 ratio is an automatic rejection. Given all of the other images have different ratios, this is a result of your own cropping, and nothing to do with the export process.
    That information is super useful. Thank you. I've now amended my workspace to use a locked ratio and to check each export. I think I've killed all the CA and fringing now. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-BPES PA-38-112 Tomahawk (1 of 1).jpg
Views:	69
Size:	597.6 KB
ID:	1101388

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post
    4. No idea why its exporting in a strange manner. Aside from that, is 4 okay?
    Quality should be ok, but anything less than a 16:9 ratio is an automatic rejection. Given all of the other images have different ratios, this is a result of your own cropping, and nothing to do with the export process.

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. Fringing is due to your lens (quality).
    3. Couldn't tell you without seeing the original
    4. 1.3 Image Formats https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...es-new-version
    1. I found the purple fringing now. Will make some manual adjustments to the CA.
    3. I'll upload it later with the edit. I think it's blurring in the gear area after a closer look on mobile. I'll try reducing the mask to see if it's just soft first.
    4. No idea why its exporting in a strange manner. Aside from that, is 4 okay?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post

    1. Is there still some purple fringing or due to the reflection on the glass?
    2. Thank you. That'll join the que tonight then.
    3. Concerned with this one. Obviously a scrapper if it's blurred. I'll sharpen it further tonight but this was taken during the takeoff roll so blur isn't obvious to me. Any further pointers in this one would be great but if its a scrapper, I'll scrap it. Not great at discerning blur or softness on some images.
    4. A black bar hiding somewhere or just incorrect sizing? I'll re-export it later after investigating.

    Thank you for your help again bud
    1. Fringing is due to your lens (quality).
    3. Couldn't tell you without seeing the original
    4. 1.3 Image Formats https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...es-new-version

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. soft, color, cropping/ratio
    2. ok for me
    3. soft/blurry
    4. cropping/ratio
    1. Is there still some purple fringing or due to the reflection on the glass?
    2. Thank you. That'll join the que tonight then.
    3. Concerned with this one. Obviously a scrapper if it's blurred. I'll sharpen it further tonight but this was taken during the takeoff roll so blur isn't obvious to me. Any further pointers in this one would be great but if its a scrapper, I'll scrap it. Not great at discerning blur or softness on some images.
    4. A black bar hiding somewhere or just incorrect sizing? I'll re-export it later after investigating.

    Thank you for your help again bud

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post

    Re-sharpened and new export settings in LRC. Improvement or still too soft? Also added another PA38 (different registration) Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0183.jpg Views:	0 Size:	517.0 KB ID:	1101302

    Click image for larger version Name:	20200920143134_IMG_0181.jpg Views:	0 Size:	575.7 KB ID:	1101301Click image for larger version Name:	20201019123220_IMG_0532.jpg Views:	0 Size:	629.9 KB ID:	1101299Click image for larger version Name:	20201019125054_IMG_0536.jpg Views:	0 Size:	623.1 KB ID:	1101300
    1. soft, color, cropping/ratio
    2. ok for me
    3. soft/blurry
    4. cropping/ratio

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1-3. soft to very soft
    4. acceptable for me
    Re-sharpened and new export settings in LRC. Improvement or still too soft? Also added another PA38 (different registration) Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0183.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	517.0 KB
ID:	1101302

    Click image for larger version  Name:	20200920143134_IMG_0181.jpg Views:	0 Size:	575.7 KB ID:	1101301Click image for larger version  Name:	20201019123220_IMG_0532.jpg Views:	0 Size:	629.9 KB ID:	1101299Click image for larger version  Name:	20201019125054_IMG_0536.jpg Views:	0 Size:	623.1 KB ID:	1101300
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post

    Hows this for the CA? Also added sharpening.

    Edit: 3 fresh edits from the new workspace! Click image for larger version

Name:	20200920143134_IMG_0181.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	613.8 KB
ID:	1101253Click image for larger version

Name:	20201019123220_IMG_0532.jpg
Views:	70
Size:	588.3 KB
ID:	1101254Click image for larger version

Name:	20201019125054_IMG_0536.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	562.1 KB
ID:	1101255

    Click image for larger version Name:	20201019125926_IMG_0548.jpg Views:	0 Size:	596.8 KB ID:	1101250
    1-3. soft to very soft
    4. acceptable for me

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    A bit soft, and fringing/aberration somewhat less noticeable, but still there.
    Hows this for the CA? Also added sharpening.

    Edit: 3 fresh edits from the new workspace! Click image for larger version

Name:	20200920143134_IMG_0181.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	613.8 KB
ID:	1101253Click image for larger version

Name:	20201019123220_IMG_0532.jpg
Views:	70
Size:	588.3 KB
ID:	1101254Click image for larger version

Name:	20201019125054_IMG_0536.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	562.1 KB
ID:	1101255

    Click image for larger version  Name:	20201019125926_IMG_0548.jpg Views:	0 Size:	596.8 KB ID:	1101250

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    A bit soft, and fringing/aberration somewhat less noticeable, but still there.
    Hmm. I'm using the remove Remove CA function so I think it may need some manual input to correct. Back to tutorials I go!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post

    Invested in LRC so thought I'd give this another attempt whilst following along to a tutorial (similar values so I may of undersharpened) Click image for larger version

Name:	20201019125926_IMG_0548.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	625.3 KB
ID:	1101245 ... Also, if I upload 1 picture now and others later, would that violate the rules of pre-screening?
    A bit soft, and fringing/aberration somewhat less noticeable, but still there.

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. ok for me
    2. soft, color, noise, centering
    3. oversharpened, color, centering



    There is (was) a black bar at the bottom of the frame on both images.
    Invested in LRC so thought I'd give this another attempt whilst following along to a tutorial (similar values so I may of undersharpened) Click image for larger version

Name:	20201019125926_IMG_0548.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	625.3 KB
ID:	1101245 ... Also, if I upload 1 picture now and others later, would that violate the rules of pre-screening?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X