Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Advice for LewisW295 Please

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post
    Evening again, I've tried this new workflow on this image which I couldn't get to feel right in LR. Any feedback on the image would be appreciated Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1089-Enhanced.jpg
Views:	90
Size:	814.1 KB
ID:	1111687
    Noisy and highlights close to being clipped though I'd probably be more concerned about the former.

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Evening again, I've tried this new workflow on this image which I couldn't get to feel right in LR. Any feedback on the image would be appreciated Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1089-Enhanced.jpg
Views:	90
Size:	814.1 KB
ID:	1111687

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Image is heat hazed. Not fixable.
    ... How the hell did I miss that. Sorry bud! That'll teach me to rush.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_39056.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	739.3 KB
ID:	1111664 Good Evening

    Can I get some feedback on this image? Trying a new workflow but really not sure if it's an improved one or not! Edit: Wrong file.
    Image is heat hazed. Not fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_39056.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	739.3 KB
ID:	1111664 Good Evening

    Can I get some feedback on this image? Trying a new workflow but really not sure if it's an improved one or not! Edit: Wrong file.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post
    Good Evening,

    Taking a stab back through my first few photos. Concerned about softness on the first and motive/distance/softness on the 2nd.I have tried to frame the 2nd image in a slightly different manner to capture the wing vortex/vortices and add some movement to the photo. If these would be classed as the same phase, please can I have feedback for the first image and not the second (I'm under the impression these are different phases of the flight).
    Click image for larger version

Name:	CT-01.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	723.0 KB
ID:	1111282Click image for larger version

Name:	CT-01-2.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	673.6 KB
ID:	1111284
    1. obstruction/vignetting. looks like fence through part of the frame.
    2. too far, dark/backlit, noisy

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Good Evening,

    Taking a stab back through my first few photos. Concerned about softness on the first and motive/distance/softness on the 2nd.I have tried to frame the 2nd image in a slightly different manner to capture the wing vortex/vortices and add some movement to the photo. If these would be classed as the same phase, please can I have feedback for the first image and not the second (I'm under the impression these are different phases of the flight).
    Click image for larger version

Name:	CT-01.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	723.0 KB
ID:	1111282Click image for larger version

Name:	CT-01-2.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	673.6 KB
ID:	1111284
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post
    Hey there, just the one for today (unless you'll be taking pictures of sparrows, magpies and seagulls anytime soon?) which I have two concerns for. Firstly, contrast as this was a Night Shot taken shortly after the sun had set. Secondly, motive/cut off. The huge wingspan of the plane left a LOT of dead space.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	test.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	531.6 KB
ID:	1110735
    Image would be rejected for dark/contrast/soft/noisy. Crop is somewhat irrelevant due to the lack of quality.

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Hey there, just the one for today (unless you'll be taking pictures of sparrows, magpies and seagulls anytime soon?) which I have two concerns for. Firstly, contrast as this was a Night Shot taken shortly after the sun had set. Secondly, motive/cut off. The huge wingspan of the plane left a LOT of dead space.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	test.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	531.6 KB
ID:	1110735

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post
    Hi all,

    Would the clouds cause this to be a contrast issue?
    No, should be ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Hi all,

    Would the clouds cause this to be a contrast issue?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	ZH826.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	460.9 KB
ID:	1110101

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    People asking reasonable, honest, or sincere questions never get sworn at

    Even at that, for worse I'd only shake my head and move on to the next. No need to get angry about anything here.
    And this is why I like jetphotos

    ​​​​Thanks for the feedback bud.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. borderline contrast (would be a rejection for me)
    2. contrast
    3. yes, backlit
    People asking reasonable, honest, or sincere questions never get sworn at

    Even at that, for worse I'd only shake my head and move on to the next. No need to get angry about anything here.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post
    Hi there,
    3 I have some concerns about. First, the Bizjet. Too dark? Second, the A320. Automatic contrast failure that I would normally of binned instantly but, it's a hot photo due to the new livery. I'm going to assume straight off the bat that you've just sworn at me quite loudly too! Finally, the 146. Backlit by JP standards?
    1. borderline contrast (would be a rejection for me)
    2. contrast
    3. yes, backlit

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Hi there,

    3 I have some concerns about. First, the Bizjet. Too dark? Second, the A320. Automatic contrast failure that I would normally of binned instantly but, it's a hot photo due to the new livery. I'm going to assume straight off the bat that you've just sworn at me quite loudly too! Finally, the 146. Backlit by JP standards? Click image for larger version

Name:	g-cmbc.jpg
Views:	56
Size:	733.1 KB
ID:	1109629Click image for larger version

Name:	g-ezbk.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	454.6 KB
ID:	1109628Click image for larger version

Name:	g-jots.jpg
Views:	56
Size:	815.2 KB
ID:	1109630

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X