Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Advice for LewisW295 Please

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post
    4. A slight pull back on the shadows maybe or is the issue more than that?
    Exposure is ok, but I see someone could possibly confuse the harsh contrast/shadows with underexposure.

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1-2. ok for me
    3. soft, contrast
    4. vignetting gone, but in brightening you've pushed the contrast up a bit so I'd consider it borderline
    1/2. Epic. They will join the que when I have some slots again.
    3. Well that's better than expected for a shot that I thought would be a noise rejection at least!
    4. A slight pull back on the shadows maybe or is the issue more than that?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post

    Okay, rookie attempt no.1 at rectifying the vignetting manually. I've also resharpened BOPC. No other adjustments were made to the vignette rejection edits.

    EDIT: I've also added an utter longshot. This being an experiment with RAW editing for the first time. Whilst I'm expecting a contrast rejection, could you please feedback on any other rejections as well?
    1-2. ok for me
    3. soft, contrast
    4. vignetting gone, but in brightening you've pushed the contrast up a bit so I'd consider it borderline

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Possibly.



    Noticeable in three corners, especially right side.
    Okay, rookie attempt no.1 at rectifying the vignetting manually. I've also resharpened BOPC. No other adjustments were made to the vignette rejection edits.

    EDIT: I've also added an utter longshot. This being an experiment with RAW editing for the first time. Whilst I'm expecting a contrast rejection, could you please feedback on any other rejections as well?

    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0947.jpg Views:	0 Size:	585.2 KB ID:	1102711
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0891.jpg Views:	0 Size:	551.7 KB ID:	1102710

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0616.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	506.0 KB
ID:	1102712
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0919.jpg Views:	0 Size:	524.5 KB ID:	1102709

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post

    1. Is this fixable on this image?
    Possibly.

    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post
    4. Odd as this is fairly tight on the crop. Again, this image had the lens corrections applied. I'll attempt to fix it on this image.
    Noticeable in three corners, especially right side.

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. vignetting
    2. ok for me
    3. borderline soft
    4. vignetting
    1. Is this fixable on this image? Lens corrections were made but I can't crop this image.
    2. Okay, will upload
    3. I'll resharpen once my PC is back together.
    4. Odd as this is fairly tight on the crop. Again, this image had the lens corrections applied. I'll attempt to fix it on this image.

    ​​​​

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post
    Hey there JP Crew.

    3 fresh images and a different shot of the Lynx. I seem to struggle with choppers....

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0891.jpg
Views:	65
Size:	539.3 KB
ID:	1102611Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0937.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	550.6 KB
ID:	1102612Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0947.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	582.6 KB
ID:	1102613Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0919.jpg
Views:	72
Size:	531.4 KB
ID:	1102610
    1. vignetting
    2. ok for me
    3. borderline soft
    4. vignetting

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Hey there JP Crew.

    3 fresh images and a different shot of the Lynx. I seem to struggle with choppers....

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0891.jpg
Views:	65
Size:	539.3 KB
ID:	1102611Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0937.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	550.6 KB
ID:	1102612Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0947.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	582.6 KB
ID:	1102613Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0919.jpg
Views:	72
Size:	531.4 KB
ID:	1102610

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    For helicopters, pretty hard to get otherwise.
    Oof. May have to take another look into the depths of my memory card on that one then!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post

    Are static propellors frowned upon? Have a few other shots where the prop was stopped. Hard to tell if it's blurry or soft to my eye still
    For helicopters, pretty hard to get otherwise.

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. soft/blurry, dark
    2. ok for me
    Are static propellors frowned upon? Have a few other shots where the prop was stopped. Hard to tell if it's blurry or soft to my eye still

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post

    Okay, corrected and uploaded.

    With this Wildcat, I feel as if something is off but I can't tell what. Any advice for further editing? Also, resharpened OPET.


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0920.jpg
Views:	64
Size:	526.2 KB
ID:	1102566
    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-OPET PA-28-181 Cherokee Archer II.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	658.8 KB
ID:	1102565
    1. soft/blurry, dark
    2. ok for me

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    With this specific image? No.
    Okay, corrected and uploaded.

    With this Wildcat, I feel as if something is off but I can't tell what. Any advice for further editing? Also, resharpened OPET.


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0920.jpg
Views:	64
Size:	526.2 KB
ID:	1102566
    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-OPET PA-28-181 Cherokee Archer II.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	658.8 KB
ID:	1102565

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by LewisW295 View Post
    2. Any other issues with this one?
    With this specific image? No.

    Leave a comment:


  • LewisW295
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. bit soft, but ok for me
    2. needs CCW rotation
    3. ok for me
    1. Will add a smidgen of sharpening and post again later. If its not an improvement, I'll upload the first copy.
    2. Any other issues with this one? Shot at a god awful angle through a fence. Will adjust the CCW tonight and post again.
    3. Will upload this evening

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X