Pre-screening Advice for LewisW295 Please

[LewisW295]

You'll have to be a little more specific.

N142TW, I uploaded it but the resolution was out. Before it went through screening, I cleaned out my useless LRC images and accidentally got rid of the main copy.

[dlowwa]

Hey,

Due to me being a massive tit and accidentally deleting the image from lightroom, would you mind pre-screening this one again in the future? The rejection isn't fixable as it was a crop issue. If not then I completely understand as it would be an entirely fresh edit from the base file.

You'll have to be a little more specific.

[LewisW295]

4. acceptable for me

Hey,

Due to me being a massive tit and accidentally deleting the image from lightroom, would you mind pre-screening this one again in the future? The rejection isn't fixable as it was a crop issue. If not then I completely understand as it would be an entirely fresh edit from the base file.

[LewisW295]

Selective sharpening itself does not produce oversharpening. It depends on the sharpening settings.

Ah okay, guess it's something I will have to play with and "eyeball". Thanks bud

[LX-A343]

Note to self. Always check the bleeding crop values!

Anyway, just a quick question regarding selective sharpening... Does this tend to give an oversharpened look? Haven't been on LRC for a while but looking to up my sharpening game!

Selective sharpening itself does not produce oversharpening. It depends on the sharpening settings.

[LewisW295]

Note to self. Always check the bleeding crop values!

Anyway, just a quick question regarding selective sharpening... Does this tend to give an oversharpened look? Haven't been on LRC for a while but looking to up my sharpening game!

[LewisW295]

For me? No. Not that interesting a photo. But if you have reasons to, go for it.

It's interesting for me but would probably require more effort than it's worth JP.

[dlowwa]

1. Worth trying to fix in your opinion?

For me? No. Not that interesting a photo. But if you have reasons to, go for it.

[LewisW295]

1. borderline soft/blurry/compression
2. soft/blurry, noisy, color, obstruction. Not fixable.

1. Worth trying to fix in your opinion?

[dlowwa]

Hi JP crew,

Can I get a pre-screen on these 2 shots please? Not too sure if I've over-processed/sharpened one and not sure the other is sharp enough. Also, I don't believe they are similar as they were taken during different stages of the arrival. One horrific angle of the dirty side during the rollout and one during taxi. The taxi shot had the wingtips intentionally clipped as they blew the image slightly out of proportion and left it looking low and small in the shot.

1. borderline soft/blurry/compression
2. soft/blurry, noisy, color, obstruction. Not fixable.

[LewisW295]

Hi JP crew,

Can I get a pre-screen on these 2 shots please? Not too sure if I've over-processed/sharpened one and not sure the other is sharp enough. Also, I don't believe they are similar as they were taken during different stages of the arrival. One horrific angle of the dirty side during the rollout and one during taxi. The taxi shot had the wingtips intentionally clipped as they blew the image slightly out of proportion and left it looking low and small in the shot.

[dlowwa]

3. Oops! Apologies for that error! Now with the correct horizon.

Assuming the cover isn't an obstruction rejection, this would still count as a normal day photo as the sun hadn't quite dipped below the horizon?

No, this is a night shot. Please read here: 2.2 Categories - Night Shots "This category should apply for photos taken at dawn, dusk and night. For Dusk and Dawn photos these should show a red-orange glow and long shadows. Dusk or dawn shots where the aircraft is a silhouette in front of a rising or setting sun would be a time where backlit photos are acceptable and Night Shot would apply."

https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/aviation-photography-videography-forums/aviation-photography-forum/60422-upload-guidelines-new-version

So that you may answer any questions you have about categories yourself.

[LewisW295]

1-2. ok for me
3. horizon

3. Oops! Apologies for that error! Now with the correct horizon.

Assuming the cover isn't an obstruction rejection, this would still count as a normal day photo as the sun hadn't quite dipped below the horizon?

[dlowwa]

1. Reduced the sharpening and double checked the masking was correct. Rebalanced the colours (I forgot to adjust the whites and underexposed it) and removed the fringing around the cockpit. I also reduced my export sharpening to standard instead of high.
2. reduced the sharpening and luminance settings.
3. Binned for now. I'll come back to that in a few months with a fresh edit.

I also have a new one. Not much of anything really done except some sharpening and a quick, rough crop. Would the cover be classed as obstruction?

1-2. ok for me
3. horizon

[LewisW295]

1. oversharpened, color, dark/contrast
2. borderline oversharpened
3. cropping/ratio, color, oversharpened. Not going to comment on this one again.

1. Reduced the sharpening and double checked the masking was correct. Rebalanced the colours (I forgot to adjust the whites and underexposed it) and removed the fringing around the cockpit. I also reduced my export sharpening to standard instead of high.
2. reduced the sharpening and luminance settings.
3. Binned for now. I'll come back to that in a few months with a fresh edit.

I also have a new one. Not much of anything really done except some sharpening and a quick, rough crop. Would the cover be classed as obstruction?