Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening advice - p_nilly

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • p_nilly
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Looks like it was taken with a camera with a small sensor. I'm guessing not a DSLR? If so, might be difficult to fix the issue, since it's an inherent quality of the sensor/camera.
    Yeah, not a DSLR. the tiny-sensored Sony WX350.

    I've been generally okay getting the other pics from this camera in, this particular shot just seems to be having some issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by p_nilly View Post
    I've had this one rejected three times for varying reasons, but I'm not sure which area the compression is affecting?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8840881

    Any help would be much appreciated!
    Looks like it was taken with a camera with a small sensor. I'm guessing not a DSLR? If so, might be difficult to fix the issue, since it's an inherent quality of the sensor/camera.

    Leave a comment:


  • p_nilly
    replied
    I've had this one rejected three times for varying reasons, but I'm not sure which area the compression is affecting?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8840881

    Any help would be much appreciated!

    Leave a comment:


  • p_nilly
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Yes, there seem to be some editing effects visible.. on the first, the center is much brighter than the rest of the frame (might also simply be vignetting in this case); the second has some more 'traditional' halos around the aircraft, though they are rather faint. Couldn't say for certain whether either would cause a rejection, but it is possible.
    Might be from pushing the whites up to get the histogram stretched perhaps? As for the vignetting, I'll have a look into that a bit more. Thanks for the advice!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by p_nilly View Post
    I'm losing confidence in what I'm doing with these older pics and I'm wondering if I'm seeing halos or not. Can I get a check on these two please?

    Perhaps what's causing the halos is the sharpening? Since I'm barely touching highlights/shadows, I can almost rule that out.

    Click image for larger version Name:	DSC07773-Edit-Edit.jpg Views:	0 Size:	443.9 KB ID:	1106004

    Click image for larger version Name:	DSC07771-Edit-Edit.jpg Views:	0 Size:	464.2 KB ID:	1106003
    Yes, there seem to be some editing effects visible.. on the first, the center is much brighter than the rest of the frame (might also simply be vignetting in this case); the second has some more 'traditional' halos around the aircraft, though they are rather faint. Couldn't say for certain whether either would cause a rejection, but it is possible.

    Leave a comment:


  • p_nilly
    replied
    I'm losing confidence in what I'm doing with these older pics and I'm wondering if I'm seeing halos or not. Can I get a check on these two please?

    Perhaps what's causing the halos is the sharpening? Since I'm barely touching highlights/shadows, I can almost rule that out.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC07773-Edit-Edit.jpg Views:	0 Size:	443.9 KB ID:	1106004

    Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC07771-Edit-Edit.jpg Views:	0 Size:	464.2 KB ID:	1106003

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by p_nilly View Post
    A pre screen on this one, please? Thanks in advance
    Rejected: soft/blurry, dark, noisy.

    Leave a comment:


  • p_nilly
    replied
    A pre screen on this one, please? Thanks in advance

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6147-Edit.jpg
Views:	88
Size:	684.8 KB
ID:	1105865

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by p_nilly View Post
    Alright, thanks

    What were these rejected for? Was it halos or overdone noise reduction? (or something else?)

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8704217
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8704226
    The former.

    Leave a comment:


  • p_nilly
    replied
    Alright, thanks

    What were these rejected for? Was it halos or overdone noise reduction? (or something else?)

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8704217
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8704226

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by p_nilly View Post

    What sort of cropping ratio should I aim for?
    https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...es-new-version

    1.3 Image Formats

    Leave a comment:


  • p_nilly
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    This would be rejected for cropping/ratio, too far, and possibly overprocessing (light halos visible).
    What sort of cropping ratio should I aim for?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by p_nilly View Post
    Can I get a pre-screen on this one? Worried about the halos and the crop resolution

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6396-Edit.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	820.4 KB
ID:	1105054
    This would be rejected for cropping/ratio, too far, and possibly overprocessing (light halos visible).

    Leave a comment:


  • p_nilly
    replied
    Can I get a pre-screen on this one? Worried about the halos and the crop resolution

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6396-Edit.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	820.4 KB
ID:	1105054

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by p_nilly View Post
    A pre-screen on these two please?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9962-Edit.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	501.2 KB
ID:	1104969

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9966-Edit.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	767.4 KB
ID:	1104968
    Both have issues with overprocessing (editing halos).

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X