Tweet
Originally posted by p_nilly
View Post
-
Both would be rejected for the poor lighting conditions. -
Can I get a pre-screen on these?
Comment
-
Borderline soft, contrast, compression/overprocessed (too much noise reduction)Originally posted by p_nilly View PostComment
-
Would this man or pushback tug by the nose count as an obstruction?
Comment
-
-
What category did I miss on this? Would it be a slight CW rotation as a fix?
As for this one, how can I tell if it's backlit? There's still light shining on the tail and no tail shadow on the fuse?Comment
-
I'm not a screener, but for the first one, I would say the missing category would be night shot, and yes a slight CW would help.
The second one - I think it's more of top-lit - the whole tail (only the front) is lit, and that would be my guess - but I'm sure a screener will be able to clear it up.Comment
-
1. night shot, needs CW rotationOriginally posted by p_nilly View Posthttps://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10268883
What category did I miss on this? Would it be a slight CW rotation as a fix?
As for this one, how can I tell if it's backlit? There's still light shining on the tail and no tail shadow on the fuse?
2. tail is in shadowComment
-
Can I get a pre-screen on these please?
Comment
-
1. centering, borderline contrastOriginally posted by p_nilly View Post
2. contrast, obstructionComment
-
Can I get a pre-screen on these?
Comment
-
Overprocessed (too much noise reduction), blurry, borderline dark/contrast.Originally posted by p_nilly View PostComment
-
Hello, what info did I miss here?
Airport - Terminal was the info on the last shot of the terminal but I missed something?Comment
-
No registration was entered.Originally posted by p_nilly View PostHello, what info did I miss here?
Airport - Terminal was the info on the last shot of the terminal but I missed something?Comment
-
The airline for this was previously Air Foyle, however I have no idea what it should be now. Any help would be much appreciatedComment
Comment