Hello all,
I've recently started uploading some of my photos to share with a broader public via JetPhotos, so I am still learning how to implement requirements and guidelines towards uploading properly processed and prepared photos. Amongst several rejections mainly due to Overprocessed reasons I have toned down my workflow, however now I have received a following rejection:
Will someone be so kind and explain how to avoid soft/undersharpened rejection reason without getting an overprocessed flag (keep in mind I always try to minimize editing halos) - or is this photo badly taken and will never achieve appropriate level of quality to be accepted.
Secondly, over the course of several uploads this one is the first being rejected due to JPG compression artefacts - my export settings are the same since the beginning - sRGB color space, 100% quality index (i.e. lowest level of compression) and resize to the 1280-by-720 pix with 240dpi using bicubic algorithm (afair). I usually position the plane in the center of the frame while taking photo, thus the actual width of the cropped frame I work with is roughly 4500+ pixels. I believe there is a lot of initial data to avoid compression artefacts while scaling down, however, may those artefacts be a result of how the photo is processed?
Thanks in advance,
Greg.
I've recently started uploading some of my photos to share with a broader public via JetPhotos, so I am still learning how to implement requirements and guidelines towards uploading properly processed and prepared photos. Amongst several rejections mainly due to Overprocessed reasons I have toned down my workflow, however now I have received a following rejection:
Will someone be so kind and explain how to avoid soft/undersharpened rejection reason without getting an overprocessed flag (keep in mind I always try to minimize editing halos) - or is this photo badly taken and will never achieve appropriate level of quality to be accepted.
Secondly, over the course of several uploads this one is the first being rejected due to JPG compression artefacts - my export settings are the same since the beginning - sRGB color space, 100% quality index (i.e. lowest level of compression) and resize to the 1280-by-720 pix with 240dpi using bicubic algorithm (afair). I usually position the plane in the center of the frame while taking photo, thus the actual width of the cropped frame I work with is roughly 4500+ pixels. I believe there is a lot of initial data to avoid compression artefacts while scaling down, however, may those artefacts be a result of how the photo is processed?
Thanks in advance,
Greg.
Comment