Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ms spot- prescreening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Thus, I would be great if you prescreeneed these two images too!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_01mnew17.JPG
Views:	39
Size:	591.9 KB
ID:	1138166Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_02new53.JPG
Views:	39
Size:	580.6 KB
ID:	1138167

    Comment


    • Originally posted by ms spot View Post
      Thus, I would be great if you prescreeneed these two images too!
      1. ok for me
      2. borderline heat haze

      Comment


      • Unfortunately, the Photos above were rejected for Undersharpened/soft, Parts of aircraft Cut Off (Finnair) and Undersharpened/soft (Aerotranscargo).

        Concerning the First Photo, I really do Not understand why it should be soft as it's scaled down nearly as much as possible and kind of Sharp in the original Version. The Obstruction is maybe subjective but I think I have already had similar Photos accepted.

        The Second Photo's quality is in my opinion much worse but I think it should have rather been rejected for Heat Haze than soft.

        I would Like to know why the screener's opinions regarding These two- I'd say Kind of usual photos- differ that drastically from each other and If the rejection reasons are totally understandable or If there's been a "mistake" in the screening process (or in the Forum prescreening, but do Not Take it as criticism).


        Note: My device Tends to Transform english words Into German, which Makes it extremely difficult to write Texts without any grammar mistakes- Sorry for the incovenience!

        Comment


        • Originally posted by ms spot View Post
          Unfortunately, the Photos above were rejected for Undersharpened/soft, Parts of aircraft Cut Off (Finnair) and Undersharpened/soft (Aerotranscargo).

          Concerning the First Photo, I really do Not understand why it should be soft as it's scaled down nearly as much as possible and kind of Sharp in the original Version. The Obstruction is maybe subjective but I think I have already had similar Photos accepted.

          The Second Photo's quality is in my opinion much worse but I think it should have rather been rejected for Heat Haze than soft.

          I would Like to know why the screener's opinions regarding These two- I'd say Kind of usual photos- differ that drastically from each other and If the rejection reasons are totally understandable or If there's been a "mistake" in the screening process (or in the Forum prescreening, but do Not Take it as criticism).


          Note: My device Tends to Transform english words Into German, which Makes it extremely difficult to write Texts without any grammar mistakes- Sorry for the incovenience!
          Cut off for the first? I suppose the tow vehicle is indeed cropped awkwardly, but I'll obviously disagree on the softness. Heat haze is a direct cause of softness, so not surprising for the second. Quite often the two reasons can be interchanged - Heat haze causing softness/Soft due to heat haze.

          Comment

          Working...
          X