Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ms spot- prescreening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Oh, then obviously not fixable as a huge amount of sharpening has been added yet...

    Comment


    • Hello, would you please have a look at the following picture and tell me if it's acceptable / why it would be rejected:
      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_56newö22.JPG
Views:	58
Size:	610.6 KB
ID:	1145936

      Comment


      • Originally posted by ms spot View Post
        Hello, would you please have a look at the following picture and tell me if it's acceptable / why it would be rejected:
        Maybe a touch soft/needing CW rotation, but would be ok for me.

        Comment


        • Hello, I'd would like to have an opinion on the following pictures, main concerns are lightning and overall quality.
          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_63new25.JPG
Views:	47
Size:	424.1 KB
ID:	1147477Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_64new88.JPG
Views:	43
Size:	619.0 KB
ID:	1147478Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_64new02.JPG
Views:	42
Size:	499.9 KB
ID:	1147479
          Thank you!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by ms spot View Post
            Hello, I'd would like to have an opinion on the following pictures, main concerns are lightning and overall quality.
            Thank you!
            1. dark
            2. borderline contrast
            3. dark/contrast

            Comment


            • Hello, as you can hopefully see, the following images were both rejected for "Dark/Underexposed". However, I actually added a lot of additional exposure when editing them. Hence I would like to know if you share my opinion that they were incorrectly rejected.
              https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10584489
              https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10584460

              Thank you!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by ms spot View Post
                Hello, as you can hopefully see, the following images were both rejected for "Dark/Underexposed". However, I actually added a lot of additional exposure when editing them. Hence I would like to know if you share my opinion that they were incorrectly rejected.
                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10584489
                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10584460

                Thank you!
                not screener
                correctly rejected
                Kind regards from Shanghai
                Charlie Chang

                Comment


                • Originally posted by ms spot View Post
                  Hello, as you can hopefully see, the following images were both rejected for "Dark/Underexposed". However, I actually added a lot of additional exposure when editing them. Hence I would like to know if you share my opinion that they were incorrectly rejected.
                  I do not share your opinion.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X