ms spot- prescreening advice

[ms spot]

Oh, then obviously not fixable as a huge amount of sharpening has been added yet...

[ms spot]

Hello, would you please have a look at the following picture and tell me if it's acceptable / why it would be rejected:

[dlowwa]

Hello, would you please have a look at the following picture and tell me if it's acceptable / why it would be rejected:

Maybe a touch soft/needing CW rotation, but would be ok for me.

[ms spot]

Hello, I'd would like to have an opinion on the following pictures, main concerns are lightning and overall quality.

Thank you!

[dlowwa]

Hello, I'd would like to have an opinion on the following pictures, main concerns are lightning and overall quality.
Thank you!

1. dark
2. borderline contrast
3. dark/contrast

[ms spot]

Hello, as you can hopefully see, the following images were both rejected for "Dark/Underexposed". However, I actually added a lot of additional exposure when editing them. Hence I would like to know if you share my opinion that they were incorrectly rejected.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10584489
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10584460

Thank you!

[Charlie Chang]

Hello, as you can hopefully see, the following images were both rejected for "Dark/Underexposed". However, I actually added a lot of additional exposure when editing them. Hence I would like to know if you share my opinion that they were incorrectly rejected.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10584489
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10584460

Thank you!

not screener
correctly rejected

[dlowwa]

Hello, as you can hopefully see, the following images were both rejected for "Dark/Underexposed". However, I actually added a lot of additional exposure when editing them. Hence I would like to know if you share my opinion that they were incorrectly rejected.

I do not share your opinion.