Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ms spot- prescreening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ms spot View Post
    Hello, could you please help me with this picture? The aircraft is in front of a non-lit background (forest). I'm happy for any advice on how to edit the image.
    Tail area a bit soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • flyetty
    replied
    Originally posted by ms spot View Post
    Hello, could you please help me with this picture? The aircraft is in front of a non-lit background (forest). I'm happy for any advice on how to edit the image. Regards
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_21new64.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	382.6 KB
ID:	1180433
    Looks good to me, maybe a touch soft but leave to a screener

    Leave a comment:


  • ms spot
    replied
    Hello, could you please help me with this picture? The aircraft is in front of a non-lit background (forest). I'm happy for any advice on how to edit the image. Regards
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_21new64.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	382.6 KB
ID:	1180433

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ms spot View Post
    Hello, could this picture have a chance? If not, please name the rejection reasons.
    Soft/dark/contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • ms spot
    replied
    Hello, could this picture have a chance? If not, please name the rejection reasons. Thanks!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_14new91.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	583.0 KB
ID:	1174772

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ms spot View Post
    Hello, could you please prescreen the following two images? I'm especially concerned about horizon and exposure...
    Dark/harsh contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • ms spot
    replied
    Hello, could you please prescreen the following two images? I'm especially concerned about horizon and exposure...
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_04new49.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	591.7 KB
ID:	1169158Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_04new56.jpg
Views:	76
Size:	632.2 KB
ID:	1169159
    Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ms spot View Post
    Hello, I had a couple of pictures rejected in a row, mainly due to "Dark/Underexposed". Maybe this is a bit subjective so I am okay with it, but the following image (among others) was also rejected for "Bad postprocessing". Hence I would like to know of what this bad processing consists and how I can enhance the image's quality:
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Regards
    Editing halos visible.

    Leave a comment:


  • ms spot
    replied
    Hello, I had a couple of pictures rejected in a row, mainly due to "Dark/Underexposed". Maybe this is a bit subjective so I am okay with it, but the following image (among others) was also rejected for "Bad postprocessing". Hence I would like to know of what this bad processing consists and how I can enhance the image's quality:
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ms spot View Post
    Hello, as you can hopefully see, the following images were both rejected for "Dark/Underexposed". However, I actually added a lot of additional exposure when editing them. Hence I would like to know if you share my opinion that they were incorrectly rejected.
    I do not share your opinion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Charlie Chang
    replied
    Originally posted by ms spot View Post
    Hello, as you can hopefully see, the following images were both rejected for "Dark/Underexposed". However, I actually added a lot of additional exposure when editing them. Hence I would like to know if you share my opinion that they were incorrectly rejected.
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Thank you!
    not screener
    correctly rejected

    Leave a comment:


  • ms spot
    replied
    Hello, as you can hopefully see, the following images were both rejected for "Dark/Underexposed". However, I actually added a lot of additional exposure when editing them. Hence I would like to know if you share my opinion that they were incorrectly rejected.
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Thank you!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ms spot View Post
    Hello, I'd would like to have an opinion on the following pictures, main concerns are lightning and overall quality.
    Thank you!
    1. dark
    2. borderline contrast
    3. dark/contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • ms spot
    replied
    Hello, I'd would like to have an opinion on the following pictures, main concerns are lightning and overall quality.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_63new25.JPG
Views:	143
Size:	424.1 KB
ID:	1147477Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_64new88.JPG
Views:	137
Size:	619.0 KB
ID:	1147478Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_64new02.JPG
Views:	135
Size:	499.9 KB
ID:	1147479
    Thank you!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ms spot View Post
    Hello, would you please have a look at the following picture and tell me if it's acceptable / why it would be rejected:
    Maybe a touch soft/needing CW rotation, but would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X