Pre/Post-Screening Advice -Leige Yang

[Leige Yang]

Hey every one,
I really confused if the tow-bar beside nose gear will be consider as object
Please give me some advice thanks
The photo was in 1280x720

[Ben Long]

Hey every one,
I really confused if the tow-bar beside nose gear will be consider as object
Please give me some advice thanks
The photo was in 1280x720

Hi there,

I'm not a screener, however I do believe that the tow bar is a valid obstruction as it is significantly obstructing the nose gear and is not in use (is not connected to the nose gear or being used on the aircraft in any way).
This is why I think the chocks are okay, they are "in use" and connected to the aircraft, meaning that they serve a purpose. This is also why I believe the rope in this photo of mine is okay: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9897209. The tie down rope is "in use" and does not cover any significant or noticeable amount of the aircraft. The tow bar in this photo, however, does cover a noticeable amount of the aircraft and is not in use.

Nice shot, regardless, though. Definitely a keeper even if that doesn't mean it matches Jetphotos requirements.

Hope this helps.

Regards,
Ben Long

[Leige Yang]

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10059516
For this picture, when I first time upload and filled the information with untitled, however it had been reject by reason bad info, cause it has an air canada reg
For the second time I filled it with air canada and the photo been accepted.
But later on, when I check my photo again, I saw the information had been change to untitled, so I really confused and annoying by the things happened.
And I really want to get an explantion on that.

[ErwinS]

It should be Untitled since it left the active fleet. So 1st was wrongly rejected.